| (Copyright) by Rich Traver (Clifton, Colorado) |
|---|
| It occurred to me that there might be a logical explanation for the experience we had at the feast. This might also reflect somewhat on what happened at other sites, this year and last. With the Covid protocols imposed, beginning in the spring of 2020, public gatherings were discouraged. For a time, even things like church services were curtailed to some degree. But what does that have to do with the situation more recently, as restrictions are eased back? My assessment is that while our ‘illustrious health professionals’ became myopic toward one particular virus threat, they failed to realize that the other threats ‘carried on’ as before. They remained just the same, while our minds were focused elsewhere. By being self-quarantined to whatever degree we were, it turned out that we lost some of our exposure to other ‘normal’ health threats, such as even the common cold. Now we know that viruses continually develop ‘variants’. Yesterday’s cold virus is not necessarily todays. There are good reasons why yesterday’s flu vaccine is not effective for tomorrow’s flu, for this very reason. While symptoms and actual cases may be similar from season to season, the underlying cause is likely slightly different. And viruses are not obligated to develop variants in every area the same. While that might happen, more likely where they do, it would be the result of interaction between people living in different areas. It is proven that constant exposure to the developing strains of each season’s variants allows us to develop an immunity, without necessarily exhibiting any noticeable symptoms. This is the case with any number of diseases. A lot of us will see our immune systems rise to the occasional threat and overcome whatever threat it poses. It happens without our awareness. Where this becomes a significant matter is in our localization of the array of viruses in any given area. While we attend services now pretty much normally as we did before, our exposure to a wider array of viruses is still limited in that we don’t interface with other groups in other areas as we used to just yet. We become acclimated to the array of viruses locally, where other congregations do the same with those in their area. It’s when we combine with other groups that have developed immunity to their own unique spectrum of viruses, different from ours, that we see the result. We aren’t yet accommodated to their set, and they aren’t accommodated to ours. So, that leaves a cross vulnerability that will be overcome once society returns to full and open co-mingling. There’s a health benefit to that, even though our supposed elite health professionals don’t realize what they’ve overlooked. That being, that there isn’t just one virus out there. There isn’t just one disease out there. To overreact to one and leave the others to ‘free range’ while we are isolated from them, losing our ongoing resistance to them, leaves us wide open to becoming infected by things we otherwise would be acclimated to! This exposes the blunt ignorance of our ‘health care profession’ that can wonderfully react to perceived threats, while benignly magnifying ‘normal’ threats into a situation greater than would otherwise be. Distancing, masks, and quarantining might be a wise move IF there is only one virus threat in the world. But to do so, while giving free reign to all the usual sources of health threat will backfire not far down the road. All the ‘usuals’ aren’t going to tone themselves down. It’s the old case of doing evil in the name of doing good. We have sheeple among the health care industry as well, but the greater concern is where it involves professionals who ought to know better, and some probably well do! The disturbing realization (and what has long been alleged) is that this pandemic culture was not the result of any real ‘health care initiative’, but one with underlying motives to impact our economic viability and create more ‘health issues’ as opposed to reducing them. (We’ll leave the profit motive out of this conversation.) Then, there’s the underlying question of where all of this originated. One thing has been positively established: It ain’t natural! And the mandated protocols imposed worked to distance us from maintaining our natural immunity development, which is and always needs to be ‘ongoing’. In fact, their determined approach served to do as much harm as good. Perhaps more harm than good. So, by intermingling with a broader range of attendees from other areas, with them accommodated to their own local viral issues, and we just to ours, we each were put in a position of having to develop our immune responses to their set of variants overnight. What’s apparent is that we need to throw off all of the mandates and protocols that isolate us from our natural immunity development. There is nothing that ‘really works’ better than the built-in immunity responses that God placed in us. It is the duty of so-called ‘health care professionals’ to recognize and allow those to work, as they have nothing better! Vaccines or medicines don’t enhance immunity, they merely deal with effects as perceived. (And that remains to be proven.) And, when they alter or inhibit natural immunity, then there’s a whole additional level of malevolence above the one we already know! The bottom line here is that our ‘medical professionals bowed to those supposedly higher than they (higher in political power, not necessarily in medical health knowledge) and imposed a regimen which they claimed would drastically reduce the effects of a virus that these top-enders themselves released. (This is now known!) They imagined themselves endowed with wisdom greater than God and could stop the spread of something ‘going viral’, as we say. What these supposed ‘experts’ didn’t consider is that the long-term effects of their new virus isolationist protocols left another situation to develop, that linger, and will linger for a while yet. That being, that a majority of people haven’t gotten back to ‘normal’ resistance to viruses and other diseases. That won’t happen until normal interactions between major population groups allowing a continuity of natural immunity to rebalance out. We did have credentialed medical experts who raised objections, but who were censored by the (government/medical) establishment and threatened with the loss of their medical licenses if they spoke out. It isn’t that they lost their qualifications or their knowledge, just that their ability to function in any medical capacity would be forfeited if they expressed an opinion contrary to the official dictates. This is another example of people being prosecuted for their opinions. It raises the First Amendment (free speech) issue. There was an attempt to create a new government agency focused on identifying truth-telling that didn’t match the official line. Where that will ultimately lead is speculation at this point, but the prospect of such thinking is concerning. “The truth is what I SAY it is”, as the senator from Montana stated so emphatically in the “Shooter” movie with Mark Wahlberg. There was more reality suggested in that movie than was what might be labelled cinematic fiction. If nothing else, we have been exposed to a situation where such things can happen. Have we learned? Will we carry the experience forward toward any form of repeat? Knowing our government and our culture, probably not! A recent article in the Epoch Times presented a full-page expose where the CDC admitted its mistakes. They also admitted they were wrong about alternate treatments such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. (Now that it’s largely over.) These are treatments proven effective (and at low cost) that would have saved countless lives. But the bigger item in that report was that the government has set up a whole new agency with the power to impose lockdowns faster and more severe than even before! This I assume perpetuates the notion that such lockdowns are effective in countering the spread of diseases. We’ve learned so little in the recent past! At least at the government level. ———————————————————————– Reprinted with permission from: Golden Sheaves https://www.goldensheaves.org/ ———————————————————————– |
Views: 1