The Forbidden Secret

The Forbidden Secret Prologue A: Kidnapped (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
Introduction: HOW TO SURVIVE WHAT THE ELITE HAVE PLANNED FOR YOU THIS COULD BE THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK YOU WILL EVER READ Are you ready for Operation Rescue? Power-mad murder mongers have seized our planet. They don’t want you to know the survival strategy that will defeat their plans for you. WARNING: The contents of this book may be hazardous to your pre-conceived ideas Prologue A: Kidnapped Eleven year old Jaycee Lee Dugard was snatched at a bus stop. For the next 18 years, she was held in captivity, but apparently did not try to escape and, over time, developed a close relationship with her kidnapper. Her stepfather said that she “has strong feelings with this guy” and “feels it’s almost like a marriage.” (Laura Fitzpatrick, “A Brief History of Stockholm Syndrome,” Time, Aug. 31, 2009) After 10 months in the hands of a kidnapper, Shawn Hornbeck called police to report his stolen bike. The captive gave his first name, Shawn, and as his last name the surname of his abductor, Devlin. (Ibid.) He stayed with his captor three more years, never escaping even while the man was away working at his two jobs. There are many reported cases of victims becoming bonded to and even feeling compassion for and loyalty to their captors. In Stockholm, Sweden, two thieves held four bank employee’s hostage at gunpoint in the bank’s vault for six days. “When the victims were released, their reaction shocked the world: They hugged and kissed their captors, declaring their loyalty even as the kidnappers were carted off to jail.” (Ibid.) Psychologists think the victim comes to perceive the captor as the one controlling survival and life itself. Thus, the victim aligns with the captor out of pure self-interest. We acquiesce to our controllers Uncommon? No. In a broader sense, most of us without protest agree with those who have come to dominate our culture. From infancy upward, external influences help shape our values. Most people do not question the worldview which is imposed upon them, assuming that what they think, and practice is simply the way it is. When challenged, they often defend themselves. They are held captive to their thinking – which they don’t realize is often seriously off track. Villains have seized control Most are not aware that our world has been taken captive. Forces hostile to us have taken over our planet – our courts, our governments, science, education, the media, the entertainment industry, the medical industry, the legal and illegal drug trade, and they have infiltrated mainstream religion as well. And we have fallen victim to the same syndrome as a kidnap victim, passively identifying with our malevolent captor! Strange, but true! Our whole world has been held captive for thousands of years – and we *have* *come* to *identify* *with* *our* *captors. Firstly, as New Zealand government figure Murray McLean admitted to me, “We are not the ones in control. We are following the directions of internationalists outside the country.” And they, in turn, are controlled by others …unseen, whom we shall identify later. It is they who are plunging our world into its current financial crisis. They need to collapse every nation’s economy, so they can replace it with their One World Government. A Conspiracy Theorist statement? No, it is a statement of fact. They control the shadowy Bilderberg Group, a financial, political and corporate elite who, at a meeting in Greece in mid-May, 2009, agreed that in order to continue their drive towards a New World Order, the US Dollar has to be “totally” destroyed. The* extermination plot Not only that. A frightening agenda is currently being put into operation – to eliminate most of this world’s population. New World Order planners say this needs to be done, so they can have their Utopia world. In 1974, in an address to the National Security Council, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger presented 2 billion people as the desired level of reduction, but in fact the depopulation policy may seek a 2-4 billion reduction, or up to two thirds of the world’s population. This depopulation policy is intended by the world’s ruling elite to result in control of mineral and strategic resources and water and total control of the world’s wealth. (“Implications of worldwide population growth for US security & overseas interests”, National Security Memo 200, April 24, 1974) By 1979 depopulation was the top priority of US national security policy, as outlined in the national security paper Global 2000 written by Rockefeller contractors Henry Kissinger, Z. Brzezinski, Gen. Alexander Haig, and Ed Muskie for President Carter. We now see a progressive enacting of this charming plan in the stealthy release of biological/genetic/recombinant DNA weapons, such as AIDS, swine flu, forced vaccinations in third world countries, and now systematic use of depleted uranium. But an unseen bombshell is set to explode – and seal the fate of these plotters. Plot uncovered . I placed my finger in the bullet hole. Peter, a university lecturer and businessman from Perth, Western Australia, now in hiding, had called me to examine it. “A helicopter flew low over our home,” said Peter, “and lodged these bullet holes in our kitchen window. Then a sniper team from that tree on the hill fired into this same window. Police later said they knew in advance – but were ordered not to interfere.” You ask, why was Peter Golden targeted? In the process of dealing internationally in computer software, he had uncovered information – 11 months before the event – suggesting that men in the Australian government were involved in plans for the bombing of Australians in Bali, and also that individuals in the US government were plotting the 9/11 incident. The motive: to provoke anger against the Muslim world which could lead to support for a war in the Middle East, the elimination of Muslims, and the seizing of their resources. Within days of presenting a 5,000-page report to a highly placed government official whom he trusted, Peter was told he had to get out of Australia if he valued his life. He fled to New Zealand – and from there he proceeded to alert officials in the New Zealand, United States and Australian governments. After each attempt, he became the target of death threats, break-ins and physical attacks on himself and his 6-year-old daughter Katie. Peter explained: “The physical fact was this: I had stumbled into New World Order plans for a major war in the Middle East – and the elimination of untold millions of innocent people. This was to be triggered by, firstly, an international baiting campaign to stir the Muslim world into a fury, then, secondly, a series of carefully engineered ‘false flag’ terrorist attacks, such as the Bali bombing, for which Muslims were to be blamed. When I unwittingly stumbled into this plot, the Globalist ‘shadow government’ needed to shut me up.” Are lying to us On May 14, 2004, Dr Eugene Mallove was killed. The local police ruled his death a homicide. This occurred just as a discovery he had made was about to be vindicated. Dr Mallove was a scientist and an engineer with two engineering degrees from MIT (1969, 1970) and a doctorate from the Harvard University School of Public Health (1975). He was also a regular science and technology broadcaster for The Voice of America. Dr Mallove commented that if by chance you are one of those who believe “all is well in the house of science” and “official science” can be counted on to behave itself and always seek the truth – even in matters of central, overarching importance to the well-being of humankind – you are sorely mistaken. Dr Mallove said it was time to “reconsider your opinion about who is telling the truth and who is defending falsehood.” The hijackers are manipulating science to mislead us. When you see a scientific claim in the newspaper, or in a textbook, on television or the Internet, you had better watch out! It is possible you are being conned – and you won’t even know it! A major deception is being foisted on us all. Thankfully, confessions like the following are leaking out concerning science textbooks: If [it] supports our theories, we put it in the main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in a footnote. And if it is completely ‘out of date’, we just drop it. (T. Save-Soderbergh and I.U. Olsson -Institute of Egyptology and Institute of Physics respectively, University of Uppsala, Sweden, “C14 Dating and Egyptian Chronology,” in Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology, Proceedings of the Twelfth Nobel Symposium, Ingrid U. Olsson – ed,, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, and John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, p.35) Just catch this shocking revelation from news reporter Hannah Devlin: One in seven scientists say colleagues’ fake data… Faking scientific data and failing to report commercial conflicts of interest are far more prevalent than previously thought, a study suggests. (Times Online, June 4, 2009) Kenneth Kitchen, Archaeology and laments that Professor of Egyptology in the Oriental studies, University of School of Liverpool, scientific and archaeological research is not getting through to young people in schools and colleges…. In some circles there even seems to be a *deliberate* *withholding* of such information, yet it is the fruit of leading scholars… known for their restrained, moderate, factual presentation of their research. (Forward to Victor Pearce’s book Evidence For Truth: Archaeology, 2nd edition) Money talks. Scientists who speak up are being shut out of funding for projects… misrepresented… ridiculed…fired. And much of their research has even been destroyed! Positions. Reputations. Opportunity for publication. Small and powerful groups control careers. If you want a university post, you need recommendations. To get your articles published in scientific journals, you must pass what is called “anonymous peer review”. It is easy for a dominant group to control publication, research money and position. To “succeed”, you have to go along with them. Or else, displaying the liberal tolerance we have all come to love, they will shut you out – despite your qualifications. The crowd in charge here is beyond the pale. Destroying evidence On August 12, 1989, at a conference in Dayton, Tennessee, Dr Don Patton showed compelling evidence that both human and dinosaur tracks were present at the Palaxy River, Texas, at what was known as the Taylor Trail. (Would it shock you to learn that *dinosaurs* *and* *man* *have* *coexisted* *during* *the* *last* *few* *thousand* *years?) (The* Discovery That’s Toppling Evolution, chapters 2 to 4) Two well known “scientists” were present. At least one of them was conspicuously disturbed by this presentation. Both flew to Dallas the next morning and went immediately to the Paluxy River. They were seen in the river that afternoon with an ‘iron bar’. And later extensive damage was noted to the prints. But don’t scientists accept evidence? It should be noted that a living scientist today is not the solid object he appears to be, but is really almost entirely empty space, a series of holes joined together by French knitting (spaced atoms). That is to say, the scientist is as human as the rest of us. Faking of science is the result of a plan that has been developing for several centuries. An intellectual bomb let loose We might be aghast at the dangers of the nuclear bomb in the hands of terrorists or renegade governments. Yet even more deadly than all of the above is an intellectual bomb that has been let loose on the race. Hitler’s atrocities were based on it. So were those of Stalin, Mao tse Tung and Pol Pot. Now it is the turn of the New World Order crazies. What is this intellectual ticking bomb? Nothing less than the *nihilistic* *mindset* which has dominated scientific thought for the past century. Based on the popularized theory of evolution, nihilism is now in danger of committing mankind to a course of automatic self-destruction. You may be surprised to learn that many leading scientists are now questioning the validity of evolution. But the damage has been done. It has had a free hand and little or no opposition in the universities and colleges, and through the press and television, all these years. It has resulted in reasoning which has brought the most disastrous consequences. The “Big E” mindset of Hitler The appeal of totalitarian systems such as Nazism, Communism and Secular Humanism, owe a great deal to the acceptance of the “Big E”… as do fascism, anarchism, atheism and militarism. Take away Evolution theory from these belief systems, and they effectively lose a central premise necessary for their coherence. Yes, the “Big E” (Evolution) theory was a powerful influence on the mindset which dominated Nazi and Communist leaders. As the holocaust swept into action, Himmler regarded the victims as vermin, as though he was handling a biological disease. “Does a rat catcher think it is wrong to catch rats?” asked a Nazi defendant at the Nuremburg war criminal trials. So came the death camps, in which millions of men, women and children were exterminated. Gold watches, gold wedding rings, gold teeth and gold eyeglasses that the victims left behind were deposited into the federal bank. One witness admitted it took an extra five minutes to kill the women, because they had to cut their hair off to be used in making mattresses. Of course, we cannot blame Charles Darwin and his colleagues personally for such gruesome practices. But we need to recognize that unquestioning belief in evolution was a *CENTRAL* feature of the Nazi belief system, and *not* *just* *incidental* to it. The “Big E” inspired Communism Again, evolution theory was ESSENTIAL to the communist purges of 60 million in the USSR alone, and tens of millions more in China. The victims were regarded as nothing more than creatures expendable in the quest for a classless society. The central proposition of Class Struggle depended upon evolution theory for plausibility. To be fair, one might not blame evolution theory for the inhuman and degrading acts carried out by Nazism and Communism. However, the impact of evolution needs to be placed in its proper context. We need to give it due recognition. The “Big E” thinking inspires the Globalists A major part of the Globalist hijackers’ plans is to prepare us mentally to accept elimination of life as necessary. So to systematically dull down the minds of the masses, they have been carefully preparing and using a compliant servant team of “nice guy” educators whose doctorates, salaries and grants depend on toeing the line – who will parrot the ideology that “we’re *here* by *accident* – not children of a Creator, but ‘*useless* *eaters’* that are *expendable* to evolutionary progress.” You realize, of course, that teachers, lecturers and textbook writers are just the front faces. Most are probably honest men and women who are unsuspecting that they are being used. And many of them would be aghast at the “expendable” idea. They haven’t joined the dots. So, they remain unwitting puppets. Just like so many people in the media. It has been observed that “most journalists are so brain-dead themselves, so lacking in understanding of what they are part of, that they, like most of the population, play a part in advancing an agenda they do not even know exists.” (Uncensored magazine, September-December 2009) Most people are unaware The propaganda has already molded society’s thinking. The people continue to remain, for the most part, blissfully unaware of what has happened and continue to believe the litany of Globalist lies being poured upon them by their propaganda media organs, never once raising any objection to billions of dollars being poured into perpetuating their ignorance. No, the issue is NOT just a whole lot of different organizations. ONE CHIEF PLAYER and his gang *controls* *them* *all.* This chief player – the Lucifer Legion – has taken our planet hostage. Its human globalist puppets are now strategically placed throughout the highest levels of power. And, for the most part, we are acquiescing as they influence our lives. Unaware of the issues, most of us live in sympathy with our kidnappers. There is a rescue plan Why am I writing this? Because I hate to think that you and I are being cheated out of what a former editor of the Los Angeles Times called “a *world* *scoop”. Glimpsing its importance, he asked in astonishment, “Why* *are* *you* *sitting* on *this?* *The* *world* *needs* to *know* *it!”* There is a rescue program. Ask yourself. If a credible, trustworthy and all-powerful world figure were to show you a foolproof strategy guaranteed to end the current violence, corruption and misery, would you be interested? And if he had also cracked the secret to life extension beyond your wildest dreams – with pain-free, productive, enjoyable living – what would that be worth to you? Well, not only is such a rescue program currently under way, but the hijackers of our planet know it. They and their Globalist puppets are determined, if possible, to sabotage the operation, and stop us from learning about it. That’s why I have called this the Forbidden Secret. If you didn’t know, it is so explosive that, when common people discover it, they become ignited, invincible and unafraid. That’s what the Globalist villains don’t want – an informed, empowered and fearless population. They are obsessed with you becoming subdued, slumbering, and submissive to them, so that they can more easily execute their dark plans. SUMMARY VICTIMS OFTEN ACQUIESCE TO THEIR CAPTORS 2. GLOBALISTS HAVE CAPTURED OUR SOCIETY They have taken over the nations. Their agenda is to kill off most of us. They are lying to us. 3. THEIR PROPAGANDA HAS SHAPED OUR THINKING We have acquiesced to their control. 4. DIRECTING THEM ARE THE REAL HIJACKERS, THE LUCIFER LEGION 5. THERE IS A RESCUE PLAN 6. THEY ARE DETERMINED TO: (a) sabotage that plan (b) even stop us from knowing about it.

The Forbidden Secret
Prologue A: Kidnapped
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

Introduction:
HOW TO SURVIVE WHAT THE ELITE HAVE PLANNED FOR YOU

THIS COULD BE THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK YOU WILL EVER READ

Are you ready for Operation Rescue?

Power-mad murder mongers have seized our planet. They don’t want you to know the survival strategy that will defeat their plans for you.

WARNING: The contents of this book may be hazardous to your pre-conceived ideas

Prologue A: Kidnapped
Eleven year old Jaycee Lee Dugard was snatched at a bus stop. For the next 18 years, she was held in captivity, but apparently did not try to escape and, over time, developed a close relationship with her kidnapper. Her stepfather said that she “has strong feelings with this guy” and “feels it’s almost like a marriage.” (Laura Fitzpatrick, “A Brief History of Stockholm Syndrome,” Time, Aug. 31, 2009)

After 10 months in the hands of a kidnapper, Shawn Hornbeck called police to report his stolen bike. The captive gave his first name, Shawn, and as his last name the surname of his abductor, Devlin. (Ibid.) He stayed with his captor three more years, never escaping even while the man was away working at his two jobs.

There are many reported cases of victims becoming bonded to and even feeling compassion for and loyalty to their captors.

In Stockholm, Sweden, two thieves held four bank employee’s hostage at gunpoint in the bank’s vault for six days. “When the victims were released, their reaction shocked the world: They hugged and kissed their captors, declaring their loyalty even as the kidnappers were carted off to jail.” (Ibid.)

Psychologists think the victim comes to perceive the captor as the one controlling survival and life itself. Thus, the victim aligns with the captor out of pure self-interest.

We acquiesce to our controllers
Uncommon? No. In a broader sense, most of us without protest agree with those who have come to dominate our culture.

From infancy upward, external influences help shape our values. Most people do not question the worldview which is imposed upon them, assuming that what they think, and practice is simply the way it is.

When challenged, they often defend themselves. They are held captive to their thinking – which they don’t realize is often seriously off track.

Villains have seized control
Most are not aware that our world has been taken captive. Forces hostile to us have taken over our planet – our courts, our governments, science, education, the media, the entertainment industry, the medical industry, the legal and illegal drug trade, and they have infiltrated mainstream religion as well.

And we have fallen victim to the same syndrome as a kidnap victim, passively identifying with our malevolent captor!

Strange, but true! Our whole world has been held captive for thousands of years – and we have come to identify with our captors.

Firstly, as New Zealand government figure Murray McLean admitted to me, “We are not the ones in control. We are following the directions of internationalists outside the country.” And they, in turn, are controlled by others …unseen, whom we shall identify later.

It is they who are plunging our world into its current financial crisis. They need to collapse every nation’s economy, so they can replace it with their One World Government. A Conspiracy Theorist statement? No, it is a statement of fact.

They control the shadowy Bilderberg Group, a financial, political and corporate elite who, at a meeting in Greece in mid-May, 2009, agreed that in order to continue their drive towards a New World Order, the US Dollar has to be “totally” destroyed.

The extermination plot
Not only that. A frightening agenda is currently being put into operation – to eliminate most of this world’s population. New World Order planners say this needs to be done, so they can have their Utopia world.

In 1974, in an address to the National Security Council, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger presented 2 billion people as the desired level of reduction, but in fact the depopulation policy may seek a 2-4 billion reduction, or up to two thirds of the world’s population. This depopulation policy is intended by the world’s ruling elite to result in control of mineral and strategic resources and water and total control of the world’s wealth. (“Implications of worldwide population growth for US security & overseas interests”, National Security Memo 200, April 24, 1974)

By 1979 depopulation was the top priority of US national security policy, as outlined in the national security paper Global 2000 written by Rockefeller contractors Henry Kissinger, Z. Brzezinski, Gen. Alexander Haig, and Ed Muskie for President Carter.

We now see a progressive enacting of this charming plan in the stealthy release of biological/genetic/recombinant DNA weapons, such as AIDS, swine flu, forced vaccinations in third world countries, and now systematic use of depleted uranium.

But an unseen bombshell is set to explode – and seal the fate of these plotters.

Plot uncovered .
I placed my finger in the bullet hole.

Peter, a university lecturer and businessman from Perth, Western Australia, now in hiding, had called me to examine it.

“A helicopter flew low over our home,” said Peter, “and lodged these bullet holes in our kitchen window. Then a sniper team from that tree on the hill fired into this same window. Police later said they knew in advance – but were ordered not to interfere.”

You ask, why was Peter Golden targeted? In the process of dealing internationally in computer software, he had uncovered information – 11 months before the event – suggesting that men in the Australian government were involved in plans for the bombing of Australians in Bali, and also that individuals in the US government were plotting the 9/11 incident.

The motive: to provoke anger against the Muslim world which could lead to support for a war in the Middle East, the elimination of Muslims, and the seizing of their resources.

Within days of presenting a 5,000-page report to a highly placed government official whom he trusted, Peter was told he had to get out of Australia if he valued his life.

He fled to New Zealand – and from there he proceeded to alert officials in the New Zealand, United States and Australian governments. After each attempt, he became the target of death threats, break-ins and physical attacks on himself and his 6-year-old daughter Katie.

Peter explained: “The physical fact was this: I had stumbled into New World Order plans for a major war in the Middle East – and the elimination of untold millions of innocent people. This was to be triggered by, firstly, an international baiting campaign to stir the Muslim world into a fury, then, secondly, a series of carefully engineered ‘false flag’ terrorist attacks, such as the Bali bombing, for which Muslims were to be blamed. When I unwittingly stumbled into this plot, the Globalist ‘shadow government’ needed to shut me up.”

Are lying to us
On May 14, 2004, Dr Eugene Mallove was killed. The local police ruled his death a homicide. This occurred just as a discovery he had made was about to be vindicated.

Dr Mallove was a scientist and an engineer with two engineering degrees from MIT (1969, 1970) and a doctorate from the Harvard University School of Public Health (1975). He was also a regular science and technology broadcaster for The Voice of America.

Dr Mallove commented that if by chance you are one of those who believe “all is well in the house of science” and “official science” can be counted on to behave itself and always seek the truth – even in matters of central, overarching importance to the well-being of humankind – you are sorely mistaken.

Dr Mallove said it was time to “reconsider your opinion about who is telling the truth and who is defending falsehood.”

The hijackers are manipulating science to mislead us. When you see a scientific claim in the newspaper, or in a textbook, on television or the Internet, you had better watch out! It is possible you are being conned – and you won’t even know it! A major deception is being foisted on us all.

Thankfully, confessions like the following are leaking out concerning science textbooks:

If [it] supports our theories, we put it in the main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in a footnote. And if it is completely ‘out of date’, we just drop it. (T. Save-Soderbergh and I.U. Olsson -Institute of Egyptology and Institute of Physics respectively, University of Uppsala, Sweden, “C14 Dating and Egyptian Chronology,” in Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology, Proceedings of the Twelfth Nobel Symposium, Ingrid U. Olsson – ed,, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, and John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, p.35)

Just catch this shocking revelation from news reporter Hannah Devlin:

One in seven scientists say colleagues’ fake data… Faking scientific data and failing to report commercial conflicts of interest are far more prevalent than previously thought, a study suggests. (Times Online, June 4, 2009)

Kenneth Kitchen, Archaeology and laments that Professor of Egyptology in the Oriental studies, University of School of Liverpool, scientific and archaeological research is not getting through to young people in schools and colleges….

In some circles there even seems to be a deliberate withholding of such information, yet it is the fruit of leading scholars… known for their restrained, moderate, factual presentation of their research. (Forward to Victor Pearce’s book Evidence For Truth: Archaeology, 2nd edition)

Money talks. Scientists who speak up are being shut out of funding for projects… misrepresented… ridiculed…fired. And much of their research has even been destroyed! Positions. Reputations. Opportunity for publication. Small and powerful groups control careers. If you want a university post, you need recommendations. To get your articles published in scientific journals, you must pass what is called “anonymous peer review”. It is easy for a dominant group to control publication, research money and position. To “succeed”, you have to go along with them. Or else, displaying the liberal tolerance we have all come to love, they will shut you out – despite your qualifications. The crowd in charge here is beyond the pale.

Destroying evidence
On August 12, 1989, at a conference in Dayton, Tennessee, Dr Don Patton showed compelling evidence that both human and dinosaur tracks were present at the Palaxy River, Texas, at what was known as the Taylor Trail. (Would it shock you to learn that dinosaurs and man have coexisted during the last few thousand years?) (The Discovery That’s Toppling Evolution, chapters 2 to 4)

Two well known “scientists” were present. At least one of them was conspicuously disturbed by this presentation. Both flew to Dallas the next morning and went immediately to the Paluxy River. They were seen in the river that afternoon with an ‘iron bar’. And later extensive damage was noted to the prints.

But don’t scientists accept evidence? It should be noted that a living scientist today is not the solid object he appears to be, but is really almost entirely empty space, a series of holes joined together by French knitting (spaced atoms). That is to say, the scientist is as human as the rest of us. Faking of science is the result of a plan that has been developing for several centuries.

An intellectual bomb let loose
We might be aghast at the dangers of the nuclear bomb in the hands of terrorists or renegade governments. Yet even more deadly than all of the above is an intellectual bomb that has been let loose on the race.

Hitler’s atrocities were based on it. So were those of Stalin, Mao tse Tung and Pol Pot. Now it is the turn of the New World Order crazies.

What is this intellectual ticking bomb? Nothing less than the nihilistic mindset which has dominated scientific thought for the past century. Based on the popularized theory of evolution, nihilism is now in danger of committing mankind to a course of automatic self-destruction.

You may be surprised to learn that many leading scientists are now questioning the validity of evolution. But the damage has been done. It has had a free hand and little or no opposition in the universities and colleges, and through the press and television, all these years. It has resulted in reasoning which has brought the most disastrous consequences.

The “Big E” mindset of Hitler
The appeal of totalitarian systems such as Nazism, Communism and Secular Humanism, owe a great deal to the acceptance of the “Big E”… as do fascism, anarchism, atheism and militarism. Take away Evolution theory from these belief systems, and they effectively lose a central premise necessary for their coherence.

Yes, the “Big E” (Evolution) theory was a powerful influence on the mindset which dominated Nazi and Communist leaders. As the holocaust swept into action, Himmler regarded the victims as vermin, as though he was handling a biological disease. “Does a rat catcher think it is wrong to catch rats?” asked a Nazi defendant at the Nuremburg war criminal trials. So came the death camps, in which millions of men, women and children were exterminated. Gold watches, gold wedding rings, gold teeth and gold eyeglasses that the victims left behind were deposited into the federal bank. One witness admitted it took an extra five minutes to kill the women, because they had to cut their hair off to be used in making mattresses.

Of course, we cannot blame Charles Darwin and his colleagues personally for such gruesome practices. But we need to recognize that unquestioning belief in evolution was a CENTRAL feature of the Nazi belief system, and not just incidental to it.

The “Big E”
inspired Communism
Again, evolution theory was ESSENTIAL to the communist purges of 60 million in the USSR alone, and tens of millions more in China. The victims were regarded as nothing more than creatures expendable in the quest for a classless society. The central proposition of Class Struggle depended upon evolution theory for plausibility.

To be fair, one might not blame evolution theory for the inhuman and degrading acts carried out by Nazism and Communism. However, the impact of evolution needs to be placed in its proper context. We need to give it due recognition.

The “Big E” thinking inspires the Globalists
A major part of the Globalist hijackers’ plans is to prepare us mentally to accept elimination of life as necessary. So to systematically dull down the minds of the masses, they have been carefully preparing and using a compliant servant team of “nice guy” educators whose doctorates, salaries and grants depend on toeing the line – who will parrot the ideology that “we’re here by accident – not children of a Creator, but ‘useless eaters’ that are expendable to evolutionary progress.”

You realize, of course, that teachers, lecturers and textbook writers are just the front faces. Most are probably honest men and women who are unsuspecting that they are being used. And many of them would be aghast at the “expendable” idea. They haven’t joined the dots. So, they remain unwitting puppets.

Just like so many people in the media. It has been observed that “most journalists are so brain-dead themselves, so lacking in understanding of what they are part of, that they, like most of the population, play a part in advancing an agenda they do not even know exists.” (Uncensored magazine, September-December 2009)

Most people are unaware
The propaganda has already molded society’s thinking. The people continue to remain, for the most part, blissfully unaware of what has happened and continue to believe the litany of Globalist lies being poured upon them by their propaganda media organs, never once raising any objection to billions of dollars being poured into perpetuating their ignorance.

No, the issue is NOT just a whole lot of different organizations. ONE CHIEF PLAYER and his gang controls them all. This chief player – the Lucifer Legion – has taken our planet hostage. Its human globalist puppets are now strategically placed throughout the highest levels of power. And, for the most part, we are acquiescing as they influence our lives. Unaware of the issues, most of us live in sympathy with our kidnappers.

There is a rescue plan
Why am I writing this? Because I hate to think that you and I are being cheated out of what a former editor of the Los Angeles Times called “a world scoop”. Glimpsing its importance, he asked in astonishment, “Why are you sitting on this? The world needs to know it!”

There is a rescue program.

Ask yourself. If a credible, trustworthy and all-powerful world figure were to show you a foolproof strategy guaranteed to end the current violence, corruption and misery, would you be interested? And if he had also cracked the secret to life extension beyond your wildest dreams – with pain-free, productive, enjoyable living – what would that be worth to you?

Well, not only is such a rescue program currently under way, but the hijackers of our planet know it. They and their Globalist puppets are determined, if possible, to
sabotage the operation, and
stop us from learning about it.

That’s why I have called this the Forbidden Secret. If you didn’t know, it is so explosive that, when common people discover it, they become ignited, invincible and unafraid.

That’s what the Globalist villains don’t want – an informed, empowered and fearless population. They are obsessed with you becoming subdued, slumbering, and submissive to them, so that they can more easily execute their dark plans.

SUMMARY

VICTIMS OFTEN ACQUIESCE TO THEIR CAPTORS

2. GLOBALISTS HAVE CAPTURED OUR SOCIETY They have taken over the nations. Their agenda is to kill off most of us. They are lying to us.

3. THEIR PROPAGANDA HAS SHAPED OUR THINKING We have acquiesced to their control.

4. DIRECTING THEM ARE THE REAL HIJACKERS, THE LUCIFER LEGION

5. THERE IS A RESCUE PLAN

6. THEY ARE DETERMINED TO:
(a) sabotage that plan
(b) even stop us from knowing about it.

The Forbidden Secret Prologue B: Your Life and Death (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
“We buried Norman alive! We buried him alive!” The shocking news swept from house to house. In 16th century England, some local folks were running out of burial space. So, they would dig up coffins, take the bones to a bone-house, then reuse the graves. On opening coffins, they found that 1 out of 25 coffins had scratch marks on the inside. To their horror, they had been burying people alive! So, they began to tie a string on the wrist of the corpse, thread it through the coffin and up through the ground, then tie it to a bell. Someone was appointed to sit out in the graveyard all night (the graveyard shift), to listen for the bell; thus, someone could be “saved by the bell” or was considered a “dead ringer”. I don’t need to tell you. Of all things you possess, *life* is the most precious, right? “My daughter is only 15,” cried Moira. “She has a rare brain tumor that cannot be operated on. I don’t want to lose her. What can I do?” Fred slaved at his job. He planned to retire at 60. Missing time with his dear wife and children, he drove himself with the one thought… retire, then enjoy the remaining years. Fred was in a coffin before his 58th birthday. If someone told you, “I’ll guarantee to *add* 20 *years* to *your* *life* – 20 years of pain-free, productive, enjoyable living” – what would that be worth to you? Yet even better, what if you learned that there are some people now alive who will live to be 200, 300, 600 years old… no, more than that… some who will live on… and on… in glorious quality of life… without dying at all. Yes, you are right, it’s hard to imagine. But there is a good chance that you could qualify to become one of them. The colossal cover-up However, there is a problem. There are powers that, for reasons which you might term philosophical, spiritual, or religious, want to keep the knowledge of this from you. That’s why I’ve called this the Forbidden Secret. And, as unlikely as the connection might seem on the surface, these people are right into the *origins* debate. As already noted, they *control* the scientific community, the education system, the media, the entertainment industry, the medical and pharmaceutical industries, and they have infiltrated mainstream religion as well. They are aware that your knowledge or ignorance about your origins could definitely affect your chance of life extension. Why is this? You will see why, as we proceed. Sufficient to say, it’s vital that first you get your origins facts right. No matter what the popular theories, it is the *facts* that decide the day. Turned off by fake religious people? I understand. So am I. But this is not about religion or non-religion. It is not just about a religious viewpoint (atheistic, agnostic, New Age, Buddhist, Jewish, Muslim, Christian or whatever). It is not about that. It is about a *spiritual* *war* *being* *waged* *against* us. It is happening in your own home town or district. This is a *conflict* of *epic* *proportions. And of such importance that not a single person alive on this planet should ignore it. My investigations as a hard-nosed archaeologist over 44 years have been largely front-line, dealing first-hand* with *on-site* discoveries. And some of the *evidence* you are about to see may knock your socks off. It is still unknown to most people. Yet it is beyond successful contradiction. Is this important? Yes – because it could affect your future… personally. I promise you that a long, thorough investigation has been undertaken to guarantee the integrity of this information. Facts which *can* be *tested* underlie each point. So certain am I that *the* *over-all* *thesis* is correct that I hereby offer $100,000 to anyone who can *disprove* it – either to be retained by the claimant or donated to his/her nominated charity. What’s this all about? Glad you asked. This is about *evidence. Here are the facts. (References relate to this current book, unless otherwise stated): Facts* at a glance I submit that we shall materially and physically *prove* *beyond* *reasonable* *doubt* (sufficient to serve as actionable proof): * That we are here neither by evolution, nor by seeding from outer space, but by a direct creation of an intelligent Superior Being existing outside both space and time. – Demonstrated with evidence, not speculation. * That we are alienated from our Life-Giver. We suffer death and cannot save ourselves. – Demonstrated with evidence, not speculation. * That, in His compassion, our Creator has provided a single means of rescue and restoration through His appointed Deliverer. – Demonstrated with evidence, not speculation. That is the over-all thesis. Here it is in more detail: 1. NO.EVOLUTION: Did life appear spontaneously then evolution take over? Documented and observable scientific *evidence* from DNA, biology and fossils, *says* no. (Chapters 1-5) 2. NO.UFO-ALIEN.START: Did mankind originate by seeding from outer space? Physical and experimental *evidence* *says* no. (Chapters 6-7) 3. DELIBERATELY.DESIGNED: Observable scientific *evidence* indicates that an effect is not greater than its cause. It always takes a greater source of information to produce information. The intricate design of human life, intelligence and personality requires a *cause* which possesses life, intelligence and personality outside the creation itself. (See Chapters 8-9) 4. HAS.SPOKEN.TO.US: This Superior Intelligence has demonstrated ability to communicate messages to mankind and has sealed the authorship of certain messages in at least two ways that no human being can replicate: (a) a 3500 year track record in prophecy – cold, hard, incontrovertible PROOF of accurate *foreknowledge* of consecutive world history (Chapters 11-12) (b).a unique, DNA-style *mathematical* *code* within the structure of the written messages. (Chapters.13,43-46) Since the content of these messages is *exactly* *consistent* *with* *observed* *fact, then the most reasonable deduction from the evidence* is that the messages are trustworthy. 5. PLANET HIJACKED: There is demonstrable *evidence* that our world is held captive by forces *hostile* to the human race. (Chapters 14-18) 6…SPIRITUAL.WARFARE: Messages claiming to be from the Superior Intelligence reveal that a *spiritual* *battle* between the powers of good and evil is being waged for the future of each person on earth. One side uses force; the other does not. (Chapters 14-18) 7. DEATH.IS.UNNATURAL: According to the *evidence: We are alienated from our Source of life. (b). Cut off from this Source, our existence is fragile. We die. (c). Death is not an inevitable, natural, essential part of our existence, but an intrusion, that need not be. (Chapter 16) 8.. RESCUE PROGRAM:* FACT: *The* *ancient* *nations* *universally* *claimed* that the first great father was informed of a coming rescue program, which will result in abolishing death, and in the restoring of this world to its original perfect state. (Chapter 19) 9.. RESCUER’S NAME KNOWN: There is *evidence* that the name of the Rescuer was known from the earliest times and his name was recorded: on the ancient sky charts (Chapter 27) (b).in the written text of the Tanakh (Chapters 24 and 25) (c) by various nations – for example, the Egyptians, the Celtic Druids and the Persians. (Chapters 26 and 27) 10. RESCUER’S LOCATION KNOWN: *Non-biblical* sources show that *the* *world’s* *nations* believed the Messiah was to make his appearance through the Hebrew branch of the human race. If this be true, then we might expect the *more* *complete* revelation of the Deliverer to be imparted to the Hebrews. Let’s wait and see. 11. MESSIANIC PROPHECIES SPECIFIC: Additionally, more than 300 prophecies concerning the Deliverer were recorded in the Tanakh, including precisely.when.and *where* he.would.appear (b) that he *would* be *rejected* by the nation of his.birth. (Chapters.20-23,29) 12. PROPHECIES WERE FULFILLED: There is solid *evidence* that at the precise *place* *and* *time* *predicted,* one bearing the *prophesied* *name* did appear, living out the prophecies one by one – including those beyond human control, such as place of birth, manner of death, manner of burial, and so on, which no imposter could have acted out. (Chapters.22-23,28-32) 13. THE RESCUER’S ROLE: The prophecies said *his* *role* would be to offer individuals: freedom from guilt power to live victoriously (c) a restored personal relationship with the Creator (d) the ultimate end to death (e) a guaranteed place in the coming new world in which harmony, peace and joy will prevail. 14.. EVENT SEQUENCE: According to the prophecies, *after* Messiah’s stand-in death for all, *then* the Second Jewish Temple sacrifices (which foreshadowed that event) would be terminated. (Ch.20) This timing is important in helping us to pinpoint the Messiah’s identity. 15. ANTI-RESCUE CAMPAIGN: Globally, on multiple fronts, a high-powered *disinformation* *campaign* has since swung into action against the rescue operation, along with a direct sabotage agenda to *physically destroy or oppress* as many.prospects.as.possible. Coincidences? That brief overview now brings us to a bizarre set of historical “coincidences” that demand an explanation. Since no event is isolated and every effect has its cause, then what do these odd.“coincidences” mean?: *COINCIDENCE.1:* *THE* *PASSOVER* *TIMING* FACT: (a) The annual Hebrew *Passover* event (14th to 15th day of the month Nisan) centered around a lamb *sacrifice.* This symbolized a substitute death in the place of man, to free him from the penalty of his wrongs. (Exodus chapter 12; Jewish Encyclopedia) (b).Jewish scholars expected the coming *Messiah* to bring redemption at that same time of the year – *Passover. (Cabalistae* apud Fagium; Abrabanal, The Wells of Salvation; Ex.12:1-6,11; Lev. 23:4,5; (The Jewish Encyclopedia, art., “Atonement, Day of”) FACT: *The* *one* *with* *the* *predicted* *name* said he had come to fulfill the Passover symbolism, to *sacrifice* his life and free men from the penalty of sin. (Matthew 26:1-2,17-28; 1 Corinthians 5:7) (b) Jewish leaders, charging that the “named one” “led astray Israel”, condemned him to be *executed* on precisely the same day as the *Passover* *lamb* *was* *sacrificed. (Babylonian Sanhedrin* 43a, 95-110 AD) Was it just coincidence that both … * the Tanakh’s prophetic date for Messiah to die violently, and * the Passover “prophecy” date for the sacrificial lamb to die … converged at the precise time that the “named one” died violently? Or was something much bigger at work here? *COINCIDENCE.2:* *DEATH* *AND* *LIFE* FACT: After rejecting the “named one’s” “how to escape” prophecy, 1,100,000 people died in the siege of Jerusalem, AD 70. Their *rejection* of *his* *message* *killed* *them.* (Chapter 33) FACT: Those who acted on the “named one’s” prophecy did not die. They escaped. (Encyclopedia Judaica) Their *acceptance* of *the* *“named* *one”* *saved* *them. Bold statements? Yes. An exaggeration? No. These are both documented history. Is there a connection? COINCIDENCE.3:* *REASON* *FOR* *THE* *DESTRUCTION:* According to the Hebrew Tanakh, the *specific* *reason* why the First Jewish Temple was destroyed in 586 BC and the nation *scattered* *for* 70 *years* was *because* they had *rejected* *the* *prophets* sent by God. (1 Chronicles 36:15-20) Recognizing the same spiritual laws to be operative, may we ask, what could be the enormity of the national sin which triggered the Second Temple’s destruction in 70 AD and the people being *scattered* *for* *2,000* *years? Had they rejected* a *greater* *Prophet* – even the Messiah himself? (Chapter 29) *COINCIDENCE.4:* *DESTRUCTION* *DATE:* In 586 BC, the First Temple was burned by Babylonian armies on the *10th* *day* of *the* *month* Ab. In 70 AD, the Second Temple was burned by Roman armies on the *10th* *day* of *the* *month* *Ab.* (Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 6:4.5) These two events: are they connected? Was there a supernatural element in the timing, to convey a message of extreme importance? *COINCIDENCE.5:* *THE* *“FORGIVENESS”* *FACTOR:* *Forty* *years* *before* Jerusalem’s destruction, the “named one’s” public offer of the Creator’s divine *forgiveness* to all who would accept, was officially *rejected* by the nation’s leaders when they executed him as an imposter. (Chapters 23 and 29) *Forty* *years* *before* Jerusalem’s destruction, on the first annual Day of Atonement after their rejection of the “named one”, the traditional red wool which always turned white (signifying divine forgiveness) now ceased to do so. According to the rabbis this was a supernatural omen that the nation’s sins were no *longer* *forgiven* by God. (Babylonian Talmud, Yoma chapter 39b.) Coincidence? Or was there a supernatural connection in the timing? Forbidden information destroyed When news of the “named one’s” death and resurrection, allegedly confirming him as the Deliverer, spread across the earth to challenge the legitimacy of Lucifer worship, sabotage campaigns were launched against it from two chief centers – *Rome* (the center of sun worship – Satan worship) and *Alexandria,* *Egypt* (the center of Luciferian pagan philosophy). (The Da Vinci Code Hoax, Chapters 4-7) Acts of sabotage and cover-up included the following: 1. *FIDDLING* *WITH* *MESSIAH* *TEXTS:* In *Alexandria, opponents infiltrated the “named one’s” group of followers and surreptitiously mutilated* *selected* *Messiah* *texts* in order to *downgrade* *the* *“named* *one”.* Rome adopted and enforced these corruptions of text. (The Da Vinci Code Hoax, Chapters 4-7) However, since most manuscript copies were beyond their reach, only 1 percent of surviving manuscripts are affected. (The Da Vinci Code Hoax, Chapters 17-18,20-21; Who’s Playing Jesus Games? Chapters 12-15; The Sorcerers’ Secret, Chapters 4-6) 2. *PTOLEMY’S* *MUTILATED* *STAR* *CHART:* Between 127 and 151 AD, in that *same* *center* of undercover corruption – *Alexandria* – Ptolemy’s historic map of the stars *chopped* *out* *the* *prophecy* of *the* *“named* *one”* which had been in the star maps for 4,000 years. (Chapter 27) 3. *KEY* *WORDS* *CHOPPED* *OUT* OF *TANAKH* Around *the* *same* *time* (130 AD), Rabbi Akiva, “the father of the Mishnah”, promoted a translation of the Tanakh which *ripped* *out* *key* *words* in *certain* *messianic* *texts* that were being linked with the “named one”. (Chapter 27) 4. *RABBIS* *FALSIFY* *CHRONOLOGY:* Rabbis Akiva and Ben Halafta also *slashed* *out* *160* *years* *from* *the* *Persian/Jewish* *calendar* to nullify the “named one’s” fulfillment of Daniel’s 490-year prophecy. (Chapter 41) That’s right, 160 years of real time was ripped out and thrown away! 5. *CURSE* ON *MESSIAH* *PROPHECY:* Rabbi Samuel B. Nahmani placed a *curse* (recorded in the Talmud) on whoever would read the *same* *prophecy* of Daniel which pointed to *the* *“named* *one”* as the Messiah. (Chapters 21,23) 6. *MESSIAH* *PROPHECY* *CUT* *OUT* OF *TANAKH* The Isaiah 53 prophecy so clearly described the “named one” that some Ashkenazi Jews *blasted* *this* *chapter* *right* *out* of their Scriptures. However, the Sephardic Jews retained it. (Chapter 23) Thought.questions Why such a desperate *cover-up* of *that* *one* *single* *feature* in all these different documents? Did *evidence* so clearly point to the “named one” as the Messiah, that rejectors had no option but to (a)*chop* *out* textual evidence (b)*falsify* historical evidence, and (c)*curse* whoever studied the evidence? Shouldn’t one feel sorry for them? As the climax approaches 1. OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL: According to the prophecies, as the final showdown looms, every person will have opportunity to accept or reject the pending rescue. 2…WE.CHOOSE: Inbuilt into each of us is the capacity for free choice concerning our destiny. (Chapter 15) 3. FORBIDDEN NEWS: The hijackers of our planet have admitted they will do whatever it takes to *eliminate,* *suppress,* or *discredit* the news of the rescue plan and the documents which alert us to it – so that you and I, deprived of its benefits, can be brought under their Luciferian New Age *control. 4. THE* RESCUER’S POWER: There is *well-documented* *evidence* that today in real life the name of the Promised One – and no other – is able to halt an alien abduction, free a victim from demon possession, and empower one to enjoy a new quality of life. (Chapters 48 and 49) Sources.identifying the.Coming.One As already noted, the message of the Promised One was known to the *nations* of *the* *world, who testified that they had inherited this knowledge from the first great father. They knew that: Originally this was a perfect world with no suffering. There had been a rebellion in the heavens. Man had followed the rebels and had himself fallen. The Curer of all ills was coming to restore mankind. He was to appear in Judea – and have a Hebrew name. We shall consult both non–biblical* and *biblical* sources. Why biblical? some will ask. Firstly, because both the Globalists and the so-called UFO “alien” entities have adopted a particular *stance* *toward* *the* *Bible* as essential to their plans. Secondly, as the most widely trusted (and hated) book on the planet, what it says is directly relevant to our investigation. How you can benefit The best part of our topic will be this: You will be presented with *actionable* *benefits* in real life. (Chapters 47-49) In contrast to the Globalist plan to annihilate millions, I shall show you how you can claim for yourself an extension of life. Of course, there are laws of health that can enhance your quality of life now – and even extend your life-span to a certain degree. However, there is only one “bridge to eternal life” – and it does not involve preserving or repairing our present bodies. Death is *not* an engineering or *biological* *problem, it is a moral* *penalty. Therefore the only solution to death has been provided by the Creator Himself. I’m not always right. But with evidence* like you’re now about to see, I’ve never been more certain of anything in my life. In assembling this report for you, I have been excavating deep for rock-solid *evidence. We need to be passionate about evidence.* Speculation is out. *Evidence* is king. If you just want to surface-scan this report and say ‘I know all that’, then stop right here. But if you’re willing to *drill* *into* *the* *facts* and accept their challenge, then you are in for some mind-blowing *evidence* that can change everything for you – for the better! No matter what you’ve thought, you want to know the truth, right? So please empty yourself of previous ideas and just look at the *evidence.* It might change your life. Okay, are you feeling adventurous? Because we are about to embark on a grand discovery. For starters, let’s explore a city…

The Forbidden Secret
Prologue B: Your Life and Death
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

“We buried Norman alive! We buried him alive!” The shocking news swept from house to house.
In 16th century England, some local folks were running out of burial space. So, they would dig up coffins, take the bones to a bone-house, then reuse the graves. On opening coffins, they found that 1 out of 25 coffins had scratch marks on the inside. To their horror, they had been burying people alive! So, they began to tie a string on the wrist of the corpse, thread it through the coffin and up through the ground, then tie it to a bell.

Someone was appointed to sit out in the graveyard all night (the graveyard shift), to listen for the bell; thus, someone could be “saved by the bell” or was considered a “dead ringer”.

I don’t need to tell you. Of all things you possess, life is the most precious, right?

“My daughter is only 15,” cried Moira. “She has a rare brain tumor that cannot be operated on. I don’t want to lose her. What can I do?”

Fred slaved at his job. He planned to retire at 60. Missing time with his dear wife and children, he drove himself with the one thought… retire, then enjoy the remaining years. Fred was in a coffin before his 58th birthday.

If someone told you, “I’ll guarantee to add 20 years to your life – 20 years of pain-free, productive, enjoyable living” – what would that be worth to you?

Yet even better, what if you learned that there are some people now alive who will live to be 200, 300, 600 years old… no, more than that… some who will live on… and on… in glorious quality of life… without dying at all. Yes, you are right, it’s hard to imagine. But there is a good chance that you could qualify to become one of them.

The colossal cover-up
However, there is a problem. There are powers that, for reasons which you might term philosophical, spiritual, or religious, want to keep the knowledge of this from you. That’s why I’ve called this the Forbidden Secret.

And, as unlikely as the connection might seem on the surface, these people are right into the origins debate. As already noted, they control the scientific community, the education system, the media, the entertainment      industry, the medical and pharmaceutical industries, and they have infiltrated mainstream religion as well.

They are aware that your knowledge or ignorance about your origins could definitely affect your chance of life extension. Why is this? You will see why, as we proceed. Sufficient to say, it’s vital that first you get your origins facts right. No matter what the popular theories, it is the facts that decide the day.

Turned off by fake religious people? I understand. So am I. But this is not about religion or non-religion. It is not just about a religious viewpoint (atheistic, agnostic, New Age, Buddhist, Jewish, Muslim, Christian or whatever). It is not about that. It is about a spiritual war being waged against us. It is happening in your own home town or district. This is a conflict of epic proportions. And of such importance that not a single person alive on this planet should ignore it.

My investigations as a hard-nosed archaeologist over 44 years have been largely front-line, dealing first-hand with on-site discoveries. And some of the evidence you are about to see may knock your socks off. It is still unknown to most people. Yet it is beyond successful contradiction.

Is this important? Yes – because it could affect your future… personally.

I promise you that a long, thorough investigation has been undertaken to guarantee the integrity of this information. Facts which can be tested underlie each point. So certain am I that the over-all thesis is correct that I hereby offer $100,000 to anyone who can disprove it – either to be retained by the claimant or donated to his/her nominated charity.

What’s this all about?
Glad you asked. This is about evidence. Here are the facts. (References relate to this current book, unless otherwise stated):

Facts at a glance
I submit that we shall materially and physically prove beyond reasonable doubt (sufficient to serve as actionable proof):

* That we are here neither by evolution, nor by seeding from outer space, but by a direct creation of an intelligent Superior Being existing outside both space and time.
– Demonstrated with evidence, not speculation.

* That we are alienated from our Life-Giver. We suffer death and cannot save ourselves.
– Demonstrated with evidence, not speculation.

* That, in His compassion, our Creator has provided a single means of rescue and restoration through His appointed Deliverer.
– Demonstrated with evidence, not speculation.

That is the over-all thesis. Here it is in more detail:

1. NO.EVOLUTION:
Did life appear spontaneously then evolution take over? Documented and observable scientific evidence from DNA, biology and fossils, says no. (Chapters 1-5)

2. NO.UFO-ALIEN.START:
Did mankind originate by seeding from outer space? Physical and experimental evidence says no. (Chapters 6-7)

3. DELIBERATELY.DESIGNED:
Observable scientific evidence indicates that an effect is not greater than its cause. It always takes a greater source of information to produce information. The intricate design of human life, intelligence and personality requires a cause which possesses life, intelligence and personality outside the creation itself. (See Chapters 8-9)

4. HAS.SPOKEN.TO.US:
This Superior Intelligence has demonstrated ability to communicate messages to mankind and has sealed the authorship of certain messages in at least two ways that no human being can replicate:

(a) a 3500 year track record in prophecy – cold, hard, incontrovertible PROOF of accurate foreknowledge of consecutive world history (Chapters 11-12)
(b).a unique, DNA-style mathematical code within the structure of the written messages. (Chapters.13,43-46) Since the content of these messages is exactly consistent with observed fact, then the most reasonable deduction from the evidence is that the messages are trustworthy.

5. PLANET HIJACKED:
There is demonstrable evidence that our world is held captive by forces hostile to the human race. (Chapters 14-18)

6…SPIRITUAL.WARFARE:
Messages claiming to be from the Superior Intelligence reveal that a spiritual battle between the powers of good and evil is being waged for the future of each person on earth. One side uses force; the other does not. (Chapters 14-18)

7. DEATH.IS.UNNATURAL: According to the evidence:

We are alienated from our Source of life.

(b). Cut off from this Source, our existence is fragile. We die.

(c). Death is not an inevitable, natural, essential part of our existence, but an intrusion, that need not be. (Chapter 16)

8.. RESCUE PROGRAM:
FACT: The ancient nations universally claimed that the first great father was informed of a coming rescue program, which will result in abolishing death, and in the restoring of this world to its original perfect state. (Chapter 19)

9.. RESCUER’S NAME KNOWN:
There is evidence that the name of the Rescuer was known from the earliest times and his name was recorded:

on the ancient sky charts (Chapter 27)

(b).in the written text of the Tanakh (Chapters 24 and 25)

(c) by various nations – for example, the Egyptians, the Celtic Druids and the Persians. (Chapters 26 and 27)

10. RESCUER’S LOCATION KNOWN:
Non-biblical sources show that the world’s nations believed the Messiah was to make his appearance through the Hebrew branch of the human race. If this be true, then we might expect the more complete revelation of the Deliverer to be imparted to the Hebrews. Let’s wait and see.

11. MESSIANIC PROPHECIES SPECIFIC:
Additionally, more than 300 prophecies concerning the Deliverer were recorded in the Tanakh, including

precisely.when.and where he.would.appear

(b) that he would be rejected by the nation of his.birth. (Chapters.20-23,29)

12. PROPHECIES WERE FULFILLED:
There is solid evidence that at the precise place and time predicted, one bearing the prophesied name did appear, living out the prophecies one by one – including those beyond human control, such as place of birth, manner of death, manner of burial, and so on, which no imposter could have acted out. (Chapters.22-23,28-32)

13. THE RESCUER’S ROLE:
       The prophecies said his role would be to offer individuals:

freedom from guilt

power to live victoriously

(c) a restored personal relationship with the Creator

(d) the ultimate end to death

      (e) a guaranteed place in the coming new world in which harmony, peace and joy will prevail.

14.. EVENT SEQUENCE:
According to the prophecies, after Messiah’s stand-in death for all, then the Second Jewish Temple sacrifices (which foreshadowed that event) would be terminated. (Ch.20) This timing is important in helping us to pinpoint the Messiah’s identity.

15. ANTI-RESCUE CAMPAIGN:
Globally, on multiple fronts, a high-powered disinformation campaign has since swung into action against the rescue operation, along with a direct sabotage agenda to physically destroy or oppress as many.prospects.as.possible.

Coincidences?
That brief overview now brings us to a bizarre set of historical “coincidences” that demand an explanation. Since no event is isolated and every effect has its cause, then what do these odd.“coincidences” mean?:

COINCIDENCE.1:
THE PASSOVER TIMING
FACT:
(a) The annual Hebrew Passover event (14th to 15th day of the month Nisan) centered around a lamb sacrifice. This symbolized a substitute death in the place of man, to free him from the penalty of his wrongs. (Exodus chapter 12; Jewish Encyclopedia)

(b).Jewish scholars expected the coming Messiah to bring redemption at that same time of the year – Passover. (Cabalistae apud Fagium; Abrabanal, The Wells of Salvation; Ex.12:1-6,11; Lev. 23:4,5; (The Jewish Encyclopedia, art., “Atonement, Day of”)

FACT:
The one with the predicted name said he had come to fulfill the Passover symbolism, to sacrifice his life and free men from the penalty of sin. (Matthew 26:1-2,17-28; 1 Corinthians 5:7)

(b) Jewish leaders, charging that the “named one” “led astray Israel”, condemned him to be executed on precisely the same day as the Passover lamb was sacrificed. (Babylonian Sanhedrin 43a, 95-110 AD)

Was it just coincidence that both …
* the Tanakh’s prophetic date for Messiah to die violently, and
* the Passover “prophecy” date for the sacrificial lamb to die … converged at the precise time that the “named one” died violently?

Or was something much bigger at work here?

COINCIDENCE.2: DEATH AND LIFE
FACT:
After rejecting the “named one’s” “how to escape” prophecy, 1,100,000 people died in the siege of Jerusalem, AD 70. Their rejection of his message killed them. (Chapter 33)

FACT:
Those who acted on the “named one’s” prophecy did not die. They escaped. (Encyclopedia Judaica) Their acceptance of the “named one” saved them.

Bold statements? Yes. An exaggeration? No. These are both documented history. Is there a connection?

COINCIDENCE.3:
REASON FOR THE DESTRUCTION:
According to the Hebrew Tanakh, the specific reason why the First Jewish Temple was destroyed in 586 BC and the nation scattered for 70 years was because they had rejected the prophets sent by God. (1 Chronicles 36:15-20)

Recognizing the same spiritual laws to be operative, may we ask, what could be the enormity of the national sin which triggered the Second Temple’s destruction in 70 AD and the people being scattered for 2,000 years? Had they rejected a greater Prophet – even the Messiah himself? (Chapter 29)

COINCIDENCE.4: DESTRUCTION DATE:
In 586 BC, the First Temple was burned by Babylonian armies on the 10th day of the month Ab.
In 70 AD, the Second Temple was burned by Roman armies on the 10th day of the month Ab. (Josephus, Wars of the Jews, 6:4.5)

These two events: are they connected? Was there a supernatural element in the timing, to convey a message of extreme importance?

COINCIDENCE.5:
THE “FORGIVENESS” FACTOR:
Forty years before Jerusalem’s destruction, the “named one’s” public offer of the Creator’s divine forgiveness to all who would accept, was officially rejected by the nation’s leaders when they executed him as an imposter. (Chapters 23 and 29)

Forty years before Jerusalem’s destruction, on the first annual Day of Atonement after their rejection of the “named one”, the traditional red wool which always turned white (signifying divine forgiveness) now ceased to do so. According to the rabbis this was a supernatural omen that the nation’s sins were no longer forgiven by God. (Babylonian Talmud, Yoma chapter 39b.)

Coincidence? Or was there a supernatural connection in the timing?

Forbidden information destroyed
When news of the “named one’s” death and resurrection, allegedly confirming him as the Deliverer, spread across the earth to challenge the legitimacy of Lucifer worship, sabotage campaigns were launched against it from two chief centers – Rome (the center of sun worship – Satan worship) and Alexandria, Egypt (the center of Luciferian pagan philosophy). (The Da Vinci Code Hoax, Chapters 4-7)

Acts of sabotage and cover-up included the following:

1. FIDDLING WITH MESSIAH TEXTS:
In Alexandria, opponents infiltrated the “named one’s” group of followers and surreptitiously mutilated selected Messiah texts in order to downgrade the “named one”. Rome adopted and enforced these corruptions of text. (The Da Vinci Code Hoax, Chapters 4-7)

However, since most manuscript copies were beyond their reach, only 1 percent of surviving manuscripts are affected. (The Da Vinci Code Hoax, Chapters 17-18,20-21; Who’s Playing Jesus Games? Chapters 12-15; The Sorcerers’ Secret, Chapters 4-6)

2. PTOLEMY’S MUTILATED STAR CHART:
Between 127 and 151 AD, in that same center of undercover corruption – Alexandria – Ptolemy’s historic map of the stars chopped out the prophecy of the “named one” which had been in the star maps for 4,000 years. (Chapter 27)

3. KEY WORDS CHOPPED OUT OF TANAKH
Around the same time (130 AD), Rabbi Akiva, “the father of the Mishnah”, promoted a translation of the Tanakh which ripped out key words in certain messianic texts that were being linked with the “named one”. (Chapter 27)

4. RABBIS FALSIFY CHRONOLOGY:
Rabbis Akiva and Ben Halafta also slashed out 160 years from the Persian/Jewish calendar to nullify the “named one’s” fulfillment of Daniel’s 490-year prophecy. (Chapter 41) That’s right, 160 years of real time was ripped out and thrown away!

5. CURSE ON MESSIAH PROPHECY:
Rabbi Samuel B. Nahmani placed a curse (recorded in the Talmud) on whoever would read the same prophecy of Daniel which pointed to the “named one” as the Messiah. (Chapters 21,23)

6. MESSIAH PROPHECY CUT OUT OF TANAKH
The Isaiah 53 prophecy so clearly described the “named one” that some Ashkenazi Jews blasted this chapter right out of their Scriptures. However, the Sephardic Jews retained it. (Chapter 23)

Thought.questions
Why such a desperate cover-up of that one single feature in all these different documents? Did evidence so clearly point to the “named one” as the Messiah, that rejectors had no option but to

(a)chop out textual evidence

(b)falsify historical evidence, and

(c)curse whoever studied the evidence?

Shouldn’t one feel sorry for them?

As the climax approaches
1. OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL:
According to the prophecies, as the final showdown looms, every person will have opportunity to accept or reject the pending rescue.

2…WE.CHOOSE:
Inbuilt into each of us is the capacity for free choice concerning our destiny. (Chapter 15)

3. FORBIDDEN NEWS:
The hijackers of our planet have admitted they will do whatever it takes to eliminate, suppress, or discredit the news of the rescue plan and the documents which alert us to it – so that you and I, deprived of its benefits, can be brought under their Luciferian New Age control.

4. THE RESCUER’S POWER:
There is well-documented evidence that today in real life the name of the Promised One – and no other – is able to halt an alien abduction, free a victim from demon possession, and empower one to enjoy a new quality of life. (Chapters 48 and 49)

Sources.identifying the.Coming.One
As already noted, the message of the Promised One was known to the nations of the world, who testified that they had inherited this knowledge from the first great father. They knew that:

Originally this was a perfect world with no suffering. There had been a rebellion in the heavens.

Man had followed the rebels and had himself fallen.

The Curer of all ills was coming to restore mankind.

He was to appear in Judea – and have a Hebrew name.

We shall consult both non–biblical and biblical sources. Why biblical? some will ask. Firstly, because both the Globalists and the so-called UFO “alien” entities have adopted a particular stance toward the Bible as essential to their plans. Secondly, as the most widely trusted (and hated) book on the planet, what it says is directly relevant to our investigation.

How you can benefit
The best part of our topic will be this: You will be presented with actionable benefits in real life. (Chapters 47-49)

In contrast to the Globalist plan to annihilate millions, I shall show you how you can claim for yourself an extension of life.

Of course, there are laws of health that can enhance your quality of life now – and even extend your life-span to a certain degree. However, there is only one “bridge to eternal life” – and it does not involve preserving or repairing our present bodies. Death is not an engineering or biological problem, it is a moral penalty. Therefore the only solution to death has been provided by the Creator Himself.

I’m not always right. But with evidence like you’re now about to see, I’ve never been more certain of anything in my life.

In assembling this report for you, I have been excavating deep for rock-solid evidence. We need to be passionate about evidence. Speculation is out. Evidence is king.

If you just want to surface-scan this report and say ‘I know all that’, then stop right here. But if you’re willing to drill into the facts and accept their challenge, then you are in for some mind-blowing evidence that can change everything for you – for the better!

No matter what you’ve thought, you want to know the truth, right? So please empty yourself of previous ideas and just look at the evidence. It might change your life.

Okay, are you feeling adventurous? Because we are about to embark on a grand discovery. For starters, let’s explore a city…

The Forbidden Secret Part One – Evolution? Chapter 1 – Beyond the Incredible (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
*DNA:* *artefact* of *intelligence?* – BEYOND THE INCREDIBLE The explorers could hardly believe their eyes. Here was an unknown city. Martin just stood gaping. “Look!” he shouted. “Just see how all these pieces of machinery fit together!” “So intricately designed,” responded his companion. “Who could have made them?” They surveyed the scene in wonder. “Are you thinking what I’m thinking?” asked Martin. His companion looked at him. “Our most brilliant modern engineers couldn’t construct these.” Fantastic factory assembly lines… control centers… and transport centers… all unimaginably complex. And packed into an area so tiny. All inside a simple cell. What simpleton made up that phrase… “*simple* cell”? * * * * * * * What’s inside your simplest cell? Look magazine, in its January 16, 1962, issue declared, “The cell is as *complicated* as *New* *York* *City.”* It is less than one thousandth of an inch long. And the more we study it, the more complex it is found to be. Think of all the shops in your town. Shelves stacked with goods, display windows, checkout counters, carpets, light fittings, telephones, and so on. Now add in all the houses. Bedrooms, with beds, sheets, blankets, pillows, reading lamps, wardrobes, dressers, windows, doors. Lounge rooms, with chairs, wall pictures, TVs. Kitchens, sinks, tables, taps for hot and cold water, cupboards, frig., dishwasher, you name it. Now all the factories with their complicated machinery. The automobiles, delivery trucks, with their pistons, radiators and… Oh, let’s not get into this. It’s endless. Every living human cell, like a city, contains multiplied millions of specially organized parts – just like that. Your adult body contains as many as 100 trillion of these walled cities. Inside each one is activity which includes energy generators, transport systems, waste disposal systems, structural designers, invasion guards, food factories, protective barriers and communication links within and outside the cell city. Michael Denton describes it so beautifully: To grasp the reality… we must magnify a cell a thousand million times until it is twenty kilometers in diameter and resembles a giant airship large enough to cover a great city like London or New York. What we would then see would be an object of unparalleled complexity and adapted design. On the surface of the cell we would see millions of openings, like the portholes of a vast space ship, opening and closing to allow a continual stream of materials to flow in and out. If we were to enter one of these openings, we would find ourselves in a world of supreme technology and bewildering complexity. We would see endless highly organized corridors and conduits branching in every direction away from the perimeter of the cell, some leading to the central memory bank in the nucleus and others to assembly plants and processing units. The nucleus itself would be a vast spherical chamber more than a kilometer in diameter, resembling a geodesic dome inside of which we would see, all neatly stacked together in ordered arrays, the miles of coiled chains of the DNA molecules. A huge range of products and raw materials would shuttle along all the manifold conduits in a highly ordered fashion to and from all the various assembly plants in the outer regions of the cell. We would wonder at the level of control implicit in the movement of so many objects down so many seemingly endless conduits, all in perfect unison. We would see all around us, in every direction we looked, all sorts of robot-like machines…. What we would be witnessing would be an object resembling an immense automated factory, a factory larger than a city and carrying out almost as many unique functions as all the manufacturing activities of man on earth. (Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda, Maryland: Adler and Adler, Publishers, Inc., 1986, pp. 328-329) Amazing fact: Did you know that *each* *cell* in your body has the electrical potential of *1.7* *volts. (And with up to 100 trillion cells, what is the electrical potential of your body? … you work it out!) Your* amazing genes Within the nucleus of that little dot called a cell, 23 pairs of chromosomes are intertwined like a wad of spaghetti. These contain the *master* *computer* *called* *DNA. And the DNA molecules contain thousands* of *genes. These genes (a)program all inherited characteristics, such as height and personality type. (b)guide all growth processes, such as when and how baby teeth are pushed out by adult teeth. (c)direct all structural and system details for every body organ. You and I each came from a single fertilized cell. In the nucleus of that little dot, the master computer (DNA) contained the programming for every aspect of the yet-undeveloped person. Every organ, every nerve, every hair, skin color, hair color, behavioral patterns… are programmed in those amazing tiny chromosomes. There is automated assembly, perfectly regulated and controlled… miniaturization… and incredible* *ingenuity. Each* cell always “knows” Were you aware that each and every cell in your body contains ALL the genetic coding for each of the other cells of your body? There are *instructions* in your cells on *how* to manufacture and reproduce every different part of your body. The words are set out in sentences, and paragraphs and chapters. · The genes are like sentences. · Several genes together make a paragraph. · Many paragraphs of gene clusters make a chapter. · Many chapters make a book, which we call a chromosome. There are 23 chromosome books to make the whole encyclopedia of instructions. · An encyclopedia comprises a complete person. This is duplicated to make an identical copy, so that your body has two encyclopedias – that is, 46 books (chromosomes) in each human cell. These books contain so many words that the human encyclopedia is more than ten times as long as Encyclopedia Brittanica. To put this another way, *over* a *million* *pages* are needed for all human instructions. And this DNA message is played back every time a new life is created, because its instructions are obeyed to the last letter. This one-million-page DNA message book gives complicated technical instructions to make a plant or an animal or a man. They are *more* *technical* *than* any man-made computerized code for *making* a *passenger* *airliner, for example. They are more technical than any of the computers on our planet. Think about this. Could a series of faults in instructions (mutations) make, by accident, such a technical code? This code, like a Morse code of dots and dashes, needs* to be *translated* before it can be used. The truth is, this DNA code *needed* *someone* *who* *knew* *the* *translation* and then made a machine to translate it. That translation machine is included into every cell of your body, as well. Think about this. Someone was needed to (a) know the code secret and (b) make the code breaker. The theory of evolution *cannot* explain how this *information* arose. As we have just noted, one process which the cell undertakes is the formation of new cells. This incredible process requires the cell to *read* *itself* and then *reproduce* *itself. And can you guess how fast it does this? The complete duplication is accomplished in just a few hours. Would you like to attempt a job like that? And do it without mistakes. To repeat: a living cell can do something that no man-made machine can do. It can make a perfect copy of itself in just a few hours! Now think about this. Somehow, although each cell has such a vast encyclopedia of “blueprints”, yet each cell “knows” its own special job and keeps it. For example, a cell on your skin at the end of your ear has the genetic information to produce a toenail cell… but it doesn’t! Aren’t you glad? How* small are your genes? Now, have you stopped to consider that human DNA is infinitely more complex than our computers? As impressive as man-made microchips are, this bio-micro-circuitry is *beyond* *the* *incredible. The programmed genetic coding for all of earth’s 6.8 billion people would take up space less than the size of an aspirin tablet! A single gene – can you grasp this – is estimated to be between 4 and 50 millionths of an inch across. And 500,000 genes would easily slide around in a hole made by an ordinary pinpoint! The* density of sub-microscopic information In an interview with Benjamin Wiker, Dr Dean Kenyon, Professor of Biology at San Francisco State University, said: The number of bits of information stored in a cubic millimeter of tightly packed DNA exceeds, by many orders of magnitude, the information storage capacity of the same volume in any computer’s memory. DNA’s information density is 1.9 x 1018 bits per cubic millimeter – by far the highest density of information storage known to humans. (Paper: A New Scientific Revolution) Kenyon observed that this had led many scientists to conclude that living cells were designed by a *superintelligent* *Agent* *outside* of *nature. The* incredible RNA The messenger in a cell city is called RNA. Although it looks like DNA, it *has* a *passport* to leave the nucleus. And just listen to this: Firstly, in a split second, the master DNA and the messenger RNA intertwine. Then the DNA instantly imprints a section of its code on the RNA. Then the DNA separates from the RNA. Then the RNA rushes to the edge of the city. And there it transfers its code in rapid-fire succession to one enzyme after another. This code tells each enzyme to do a particular job somewhere in the larger organism. The whole mass of cells within a body *somehow* *cooperate* to act like a fish, a cat, a human, or whatever the total organism is supposed to be. Protein forming so that DNA could be possible Here’s a puzzle for you. *DNA* *cannot* *form* *without* pre-existing protein. But *proteins* *cannot* *form* *without* pre-existing DNA! So, can you answer me this: From where and how did the first protein originate, to facilitate the DNA code structure in each species? Mathematical probability alone has shown that even if our earth and our universe were billions times trillions of years old, it would not even begin to scratch the odds of the simplest protein molecule forming by chance, much less an entire cell. All DNA’s interlocking, working parts must be 100% intact And wonder at this! Inside the cell, one piece of machinery is manufactured, then transported to fit precisely into another waiting piece, then another, and another – each one designed specifically to fit and interact with that particular piece and no other. We’re talking about many parts of a complex machine, so small you can’t see it with the naked eye! Then what about this: DNA has to be *totally* *100* *percent* *intact* with all its *interlocking,* *working* *parts, before* one living cell can even exist. Not only do you need the information in the individual genes. You also need the *information* that enables them to work together. Such masses of information do not emerge from chance random processes. Our sophisticated machines can do nothing at all unless someone *supplies* a *program* of code instructions. And the programs must be developed by intelligent human beings. Suppose I told you that my XP Windows computer, with all its interacting information software, just “happened” – that no one ever designed it? You might be too polite to say, but I can guess what you’d be thinking. Each working piece of the machinery is designed to fit and interact precisely with another working piece. How did this information evolve? Now here’s the big question. Do you have the answer?: DNA code, more complexly assembled than a computer… *how* *did* *this* *information* *evolve?* By a fluke? I found myself unable to shrug this off. Information is not something that can evolve, step by step, nor even appear suddenly, fully assembled. It first has to be *programmed. I would like to introduce to you Dr Stephen C. Meyer, Director and Senior Fellow of the Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle. (He is also author of Darwinism,* Design, and Public Education, and is co-author of Science and Evidence of Design in the Universe.) He says: It’s part of our knowledge base that intelligent agents can produce information-rich systems. So, the argument is not based on what we *don’t* know, but it is based on what we do know about the cause and effect structure of the world. We know at present there is no naturalistic explanation, no natural cause, that produces information. Not natural selection, not self-organizational processes, not pure chance. But we do know of a cause which is capable of producing information, and that is *intelligence.* So, when people infer design from the presence of information in DNA, they’re effectively making what’s called in the historical sciences an *inference* to *the* *best* *explanation. So when we find an information-rich system, in the cell, in the DNA molecule specifically, we can infer that an intelligence* played a role in the origin of that system, even if we weren’t there to observe the system coming into existence. (DVD, Unlocking the Mystery of Life, Illustra Media, 2002) In 2004, the scientific journal Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington published an article by Dr Meyer, advocating that the complexity of living organisms could only have been deliberately designed – and that biological information could not have arisen from Darwinian evolution. Like it or not, information has to be an *artefact* of intelligence. Scientist forced into a U-turn Dr Dean Kenyon, Professor of Biology (Emeritus) at San Francisco State University, was one of the leading chemical evolution theorists in the world. He co-authored Biochemical Predestination, which claimed that the evolution of life was inevitable… that proteins to produce living cells were formed directly by forces of attraction between their parts… that proteins are just formed together (self-assemble) in chains, directly from amino acids, without any DNA assembly instructions. His theory was accepted with enthusiasm by the evolutionary scientific community. But within just five years after publishing, Kenyon suddenly had serious doubts. It began when one of his students asked, “How could the first proteins have been assembled without the help of genetic instructions?” (Proteins were the necessary information to build the first cell.) And then DNA was discovered. This would prove fatal to Kenyon’s molecular evolution theory. Kenyon confesses: The more I conducted my own studies, including a period of time at NASA-AIMS Research Center, the more it became apparent there were multiple difficulties with the chemical evolution account. And further experimental work showed that amino acids do *not* *have* *the* *ability* to *order* *themselves* into any biologically meaningful sequences. The more I thought about the alternative that was being presented in the criticism, and the enormous problem that all of us who had worked on this field had neglected to address, the problem of *the* *origin* of *genetic* *information* *itself, then I really had to re-assess my whole position regarding origins. (Ibid.) What he now had to address was this: What was the source* of the biological information in DNA? If one could get at the origin of the messages, the encoded messages within the living machinery, then you would really be onto something far more intellectually satisfying than this chemical evolution theory. (Ibid.) From Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Illustra Media) The astonishing fact is that inside every microscopic-sized cell, *machines* work together to accomplish specific jobs and are shepherded by other specially shaped *machines* to precise locations where they are needed. Learning this, Kenyon exclaimed, “This is absolutely mind-boggling, to perceive at this scale of size, such a finely tuned apparatus, a device, that *bears* *the* *marks* of *intelligent* *design* *and* *manufacture!”* Observable evidence of a Master Designer What else can you call this but *observable* *evidence* of thoughtful, programmed designing by a Superior Mind? Evidence of intelligently organized patterns. Obviously, such a Designer can only be greater than us. Greater than the creation itself. Music.in.genes Oh, and something else. Did you know this? It was recently discovered that DNA is linked to music! If you like music, but think that you can’t carry a tune, you may be wrong. Respected geneticist, Susumo Ono, believes he’s discovered music in genes – particularly human genes, fish genes and rabbit genes. Susumo is a researcher in DNA. He asked himself, If we were to assign a musical note to each chemical on the DNA strand and string those notes together and play them, what would DNA sound like? So, he did this – and the result was amazing. He discovered musical *patterns* of notes, that again reveal *intelligence. Susumo Ono was so astonished that he took his findings to musicians. And musicians, in turn, were astonished to hear echoes of Bach, of Schubert, of Mozart in DNA music. Using the same formula for converting DNA into music, Dr Ono worked backwards and translated Chopin’s funeral march into chemical symbols. It came out cancer!* Skeptics naturally point out that these strands of DNA produce only a string of single notes; it is the musicians who fill in the rhythm and the harmony. That’s so. But the bottom line is this: Whichever way you look at it, the PATTERNS of single notes testify to *intelligence* as the source of DNA. Certainly, it is not from a blind, accidental force in nature. Identical to written language But there’s more, much more. Scientists at Bell Laboratories conducted studies on the *mathematical* *language* in the DNA molecule. And what did they find? Its mathematical pattern is identical to that of conversational language. Concerning DNA, Charles Thaxton states: A structural identity has been discovered between the genetic message on DNA and the written messages of a human language. (Charles Thaxton, “A New Design Argument,” Cosmic Pursuit 1, no. 2, Spring 1998) Hupert Yockey explains: There is an identity of structure between DNA (and protein) and written linguistic messages. Since we know by experience that *intelligence* produces written messages, and no *other* *cause* is known, the implication, according to the abductive method, is that intelligent cause produced DNA and protein. The significance of this result lies in the security of it, for it is much stronger than if the structures were merely similar. We are not dealing with anything like a superficial resemblance between DNA and a written text. We are not saying DNA is like a message. Rather, DNA is a message. True design thus returns to biology. (Hubert P. Yockey, “Journal of Theoretic Biology”. Quoted in Charles Thaxton, “A New Design Argument,” Cosmic Pursuit 1, no. 2, Spring 1998. Emphasis mine.) Since it *takes* *intelligence* to *write* a *language, is it not evident that it took intelligence to write the DNA code? Intelligently* designed ‘sentences’ impressed from the ‘outside’ Dean Kenyon was asked if DNA comes in *intelligently* *designed* *‘sentences’. “Is it true that when scientists peer into the microscopic world of DNA, they find not mere random arrangements, but well-written* *‘instruction* *books’?”* “Yes,” responded Kenyon. “*Masterpieces* of *immense* *intricacy* *and* *subtlety.”* “And you argue that these biological ‘sentences’ in DNA could *not* have arisen merely by material means, as evolutionists suggest?” asked the interviewer. “No,” said Kenyon. “Just as the chemistry and physics of ink and paper do not determine the order of symbols in a printed text, but that order must be impressed on the ink *from* *the* *‘outside’, so also the order* of *the* bases, or *sub-units, in DNA [adenine, thymine, guanine, and cytosine, or A, T, G, and C as commonly represented] is not determined by the known chemical tendencies of these individual sub-units, but instead appears to have been impressed* *from* *the* *‘outside’* on the sub-units to *create* *just* *those* *sequences* *that* *make* *biological* *sense.” It takes* three billion (3,000,000,000) of those letters to represent a copy of you. There is one of those 3-billion-letter messages inside each cell in your body. The fantastic complexity and orderliness of the DNA code – condensed into an incredibly tiny size – suggests the work of a *brilliant* *intellect* rather than chance processes. It suggests that *much* *thought* *has* *gone* *into* *their* *design* – just as human beings use intelligence to design and construct computers, Jumbo jets, space craft and other intricate equipment. If radio signals were to be received from outer space, they would be understood as evidence of an intelligent source. Why then should we not regard the message sequence on the DNA molecule as prima facie evidence of an intelligent source? Designed to NOT evolve But that is not all! Gene code letters have *built* in *error* *protection! Genes store information in long strings of DNA, in the form of chemical letters, called A, T, C and G. So that genes can be accurately* copied, each gene consists of two parallel strands of DNA held together by links between the code letters of one strand and those of the other strand. The two strands are not identical. That is, A’s do not link to A’s, and so on. Instead, they are complimentary. A’s link to T’s; C’s always link to G’s. Donail MacDonaill of Trinity College, Dublin, studied that pattern of linkages between letters. And he found that they form a *parity* *code* similar to computer codes, to minimise mistakes during the electronic transfer of information. (Nature science update, www.nature.com/nsu September 18, 2002) Now is the moment of truth. No one would be so naïve as to believe modern electronic *parity* *codes* could have evolved by chance. They were carefully planned by software designers. Could the parity code found in DNA be further evidence that the genetic code was *deliberately* *created?* DNA is designed to maintain accurate copies and *avoid* *changes* in the information it carries. *This* *means* it *was* *designed* to *NOT* *evolve.* But rather to reproduce its own kind forever. Doesn’t this make evolution scientifically impossible? The genes of fruit flies were manipulated to produce flies with no eyes. When these were interbred their offspring also had no eyes. But after several generations’ eyes started to reappear due to this fail-safe mechanism, *reverting* *back* to a normal fly. In other words, no evolution! A miracle – nothing less Microbiologist Dr Michael Denton challenges the scientific community to address the impossibility of a single cell being thrown together, unless by an occurrence “indistinguishable from a miracle.” (Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda, Md.: Adler and Adler, 1986, p. 264) Each nucleotide base (or letter) on one DNA strand interlocks with a specific partner on the other strand. Together they then form a base pair of letters. Three pairs of letters form a code for one *amino* *acid. The* order in which the pairs are arranged on a DNA strand determines the information contained in that strand. Genetic information is contained in the myriad combinations of pairs throughout the length of the DNA molecule. A *gene* is a particular sequence of letters which codes for a specific protein. Is it any wonder that mathematicians can have serious doubts about evolution? Mathematician I.L. Cohen, a member of New York Academy of Sciences, writes: …any physical change of any size, shape or form is strictly the result of purposeful alignment of billions of nucleotides [in the DNA]. Nature or species do not have the capacity to rearrange them nor to add to them… The only way we know for a DNA to be altered is through a meaningful intervention from an outside source of intelligence – one who knows what it is doing, such as our genetic engineers are now performing in the laboratories. (I.L. Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong; A Study in Probabilities. New York Research Publications, Inc., 1984, p. 209) He adds: …every single concept advanced by the theory of evolution (and amended thereafter) is imaginary as it is not supported by the scientifically established facts of microbiology, fossils, and mathematical probability concepts. Darwin was wrong. (Ibid.) …The theory of evolution may be the worst mistake made in science. (Ibid., p. 210) The “simple” cell

The Forbidden Secret
Part One – Evolution?
Chapter 1 – Beyond the Incredible
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

DNA: artefact of intelligence? – BEYOND THE INCREDIBLE
The explorers could hardly believe their eyes.

Here was an unknown city. Martin just stood gaping. “Look!” he shouted. “Just see how all these pieces of machinery fit together!”

“So intricately designed,” responded his companion. “Who could have made them?”

They surveyed the scene in wonder.

“Are you thinking what I’m thinking?” asked Martin.

His companion looked at him. “Our most brilliant modern engineers couldn’t construct these.”

Fantastic factory assembly lines… control centers… and transport centers… all unimaginably complex.

And packed into an area so tiny. All inside a simple cell. What simpleton made up that phrase… “simple cell”?

* * * * * * *

What’s inside your simplest cell?
Look magazine, in its January 16, 1962, issue declared, “The cell is as complicated as New York City.”

It is less than one thousandth of an inch long. And the more we study it, the more complex it is found to be.

Think of all the shops in your town. Shelves stacked with goods, display windows, checkout counters, carpets, light fittings, telephones, and so on.

Now add in all the houses. Bedrooms, with beds, sheets, blankets, pillows, reading lamps, wardrobes, dressers, windows, doors. Lounge rooms, with chairs, wall pictures, TVs. Kitchens, sinks, tables, taps for hot and cold water, cupboards, frig., dishwasher, you name it.

Now all the factories with their complicated machinery. The automobiles, delivery trucks, with their pistons, radiators and… Oh, let’s not get into this. It’s endless. Every living human cell, like a city, contains multiplied millions of specially organized parts – just like that.

Your adult body contains as many as 100 trillion of these walled cities. Inside each one is activity which includes energy generators, transport systems, waste disposal systems, structural designers, invasion guards, food factories, protective barriers and communication links within and outside the cell city.

Michael Denton describes it so beautifully:

To grasp the reality… we must magnify a cell a thousand million times until it is twenty kilometers in diameter and resembles a giant airship large enough to cover a great city like London or New York. What we would then see would be an object of unparalleled complexity and adapted design. On the surface of the cell we would see millions of openings, like the portholes of a vast space ship, opening and closing to allow a continual stream of materials to flow in and out. If we were to enter one of these openings, we would find ourselves in a world of supreme technology and bewildering complexity. We would see endless highly organized corridors and conduits branching in every direction away from the perimeter of the cell, some leading to the central memory bank in the nucleus and others to assembly plants and processing units. The nucleus itself would be a vast spherical chamber more than a kilometer in diameter, resembling a geodesic dome inside of which we would see, all neatly stacked together in ordered arrays, the miles of coiled chains of the DNA molecules. A huge range of products and raw materials would shuttle along all the manifold conduits in a highly ordered fashion to and from all the various assembly plants in the outer regions of the cell.

We would wonder at the level of control implicit in the movement of so many objects down so many seemingly endless conduits, all in perfect unison. We would see all around us, in every direction we looked, all sorts of robot-like machines….

What we would be witnessing would be an object resembling an immense automated factory, a factory larger than a city and carrying out almost as many unique functions as all the manufacturing activities of man on earth. (Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda, Maryland: Adler and Adler, Publishers, Inc., 1986, pp. 328-329)

Amazing fact: Did you know that each cell in your body has the electrical potential of 1.7 volts. (And with up to 100 trillion cells, what is the electrical potential of your body? … you work it out!)

Your amazing genes
Within the nucleus of that little dot called a cell, 23 pairs of chromosomes are intertwined like a wad of spaghetti. These contain the master computer called DNA. And the DNA molecules contain thousands of genes.

These genes
(a)program all inherited characteristics, such as height and personality type.
(b)guide all growth processes, such as when and how baby teeth are pushed out by adult teeth.
(c)direct all structural and system details for every body organ.

You and I each came from a single fertilized cell. In the nucleus of that little dot, the master computer (DNA) contained the programming for every aspect of the yet-undeveloped person. Every organ, every nerve, every hair, skin color, hair color, behavioral patterns… are programmed in those amazing tiny chromosomes.

There is automated assembly, perfectly regulated and controlled… miniaturization… and incredible ingenuity.

Each cell always “knows”
Were you aware that each and every cell in your body contains ALL the genetic coding for each of the other cells of your body?

There are instructions in your cells on how to manufacture and reproduce every different part of your body. The words are set out in sentences, and paragraphs and chapters.

· The genes are like sentences.
· Several genes together make a paragraph.
· Many paragraphs of gene clusters make a chapter.
· Many chapters make a book, which we call a chromosome. There are 23 chromosome books to make the whole encyclopedia of instructions.
· An encyclopedia comprises a complete person.

This is duplicated to make an identical copy, so that your body has two encyclopedias – that is, 46 books (chromosomes) in each human cell.

These books contain so many words that the human encyclopedia is more than ten times as long as Encyclopedia Brittanica. To put this another way, over a million pages are needed for all human instructions.

And this DNA message is played back every time a new life is created, because its instructions are obeyed to the last letter.

This one-million-page DNA message book gives complicated technical instructions to make a plant or an animal or a man. They are more technical than any man-made computerized code for making a passenger airliner, for example. They are more technical than any of the computers on our planet.

Think about this. Could a series of faults in instructions (mutations) make, by accident, such a technical code?

This code, like a Morse code of dots and dashes, needs to be translated before it can be used.

The truth is, this DNA code needed someone who knew the translation and then made a machine to translate it. That translation machine is included into every cell of your body, as well.

Think about this. Someone was needed to
(a) know the code secret and
(b) make the code breaker.

The theory of evolution cannot explain how this information arose.

As we have just noted, one process which the cell undertakes is the formation of new cells. This incredible process requires the cell to read itself and then reproduce itself. And can you guess how fast it does this? The complete duplication is accomplished in just a few hours.

Would you like to attempt a job like that? And do it without mistakes.

To repeat: a living cell can do something that no man-made machine can do. It can make a perfect copy of itself in just a few hours!

Now think about this. Somehow, although each cell has such a vast encyclopedia of “blueprints”, yet each cell “knows” its own special job and keeps it. For example, a cell on your skin at the end of your ear has the genetic information to produce a toenail cell… but it doesn’t! Aren’t you glad?

How small are your genes?
Now, have you stopped to consider that human DNA is infinitely more complex than our computers? As impressive as man-made microchips are, this bio-micro-circuitry is beyond the incredible.

The programmed genetic coding for all of earth’s 6.8 billion people would take up space less than the size of an aspirin tablet!

A single gene – can you grasp this – is estimated to be between 4 and 50 millionths of an inch across. And 500,000 genes would easily slide around in a hole made by an ordinary pinpoint!

The density of sub-microscopic information
In an interview with Benjamin Wiker, Dr Dean Kenyon, Professor of Biology at San Francisco State University, said:

The number of bits of information stored in a cubic millimeter of tightly packed DNA exceeds, by many orders of magnitude, the information storage capacity of the same volume in any computer’s memory.

DNA’s information density is 1.9 x 1018 bits per cubic millimeter – by far the highest density of information storage known to humans. (Paper: A New Scientific Revolution)

Kenyon observed that this had led many scientists to conclude that living cells were designed by a superintelligent Agent outside of nature.

The incredible RNA
The messenger in a cell city is called RNA. Although it looks like DNA, it has a passport to leave the nucleus. And just listen to this:

Firstly, in a split second, the master DNA and the messenger RNA intertwine.

Then the DNA instantly imprints a section of its code on the RNA.

Then the DNA separates from the RNA.

Then the RNA rushes to the edge of the city. And there it transfers its code in rapid-fire succession to one enzyme after another.

This code tells each enzyme to do a particular job somewhere in the larger organism.

The whole mass of cells within a body somehow cooperate to act like a fish, a cat, a human, or whatever the total organism is supposed to be.

Protein forming so that DNA could be possible
Here’s a puzzle for you. DNA cannot form without pre-existing protein. But proteins cannot form without pre-existing DNA!

So, can you answer me this: From where and how did the first protein originate, to facilitate the DNA code structure in each species?

Mathematical probability alone has shown that even if our earth and our universe were billions times trillions of years old, it would not even begin to scratch the odds of the simplest protein molecule forming by chance, much less an entire cell.

All DNA’s interlocking, working parts must be 100% intact
And wonder at this! Inside the cell, one piece of machinery is manufactured, then transported to fit precisely into another waiting piece, then another, and another – each one designed specifically to fit and interact with that particular piece and no other.

We’re talking about many parts of a complex machine, so small you can’t see it with the naked eye!

Then what about this: DNA has to be totally 100 percent intact with all its interlocking, working parts, before one living cell can even exist. Not only do you need the information in the individual genes. You also need the information that enables them to work together. Such masses of information do not emerge from chance random processes.

Our sophisticated machines can do nothing at all unless someone supplies a program of code instructions. And the programs must be developed by intelligent human beings.

Suppose I told you that my XP Windows computer, with all its interacting information software, just “happened” – that no one ever designed it?

You might be too polite to say, but I can guess what you’d be thinking.

Each working piece of the machinery is designed to fit and interact precisely with another working piece.

How did this information evolve?
Now here’s the big question. Do you have the answer?: DNA code, more complexly assembled than a computer… how did this information evolve? By a fluke?

I found myself unable to shrug this off. Information is not something that can evolve, step by step, nor even appear suddenly, fully assembled. It first has to be programmed.

I would like to introduce to you Dr Stephen C. Meyer, Director and Senior Fellow of the Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle. (He is also author of Darwinism, Design, and Public Education, and is co-author of Science and Evidence of Design in the Universe.) He says:

It’s part of our knowledge base that intelligent agents can produce information-rich systems. So, the argument is not based on what we don’t know, but it is based on what we do know about the cause and effect structure of the world.

We know at present there is no naturalistic explanation, no natural cause, that produces information. Not natural selection, not self-organizational processes, not pure chance. But we do know of a cause which is capable of producing information, and that is intelligence.

So, when people infer design from the presence of information in DNA, they’re effectively making what’s called in the historical sciences an inference to the best explanation. So when we find an information-rich system, in the cell, in the DNA molecule specifically, we can infer that an intelligence played a role in the origin of that system, even if we weren’t there to observe the system coming into existence. (DVD, Unlocking the Mystery of Life, Illustra Media, 2002)

In 2004, the scientific journal Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington published an article by Dr Meyer, advocating that the complexity of living organisms could only have been deliberately designed – and that biological information could not have arisen from Darwinian evolution.

Like it or not, information has to be an artefact of intelligence.

Scientist forced into a U-turn
Dr Dean Kenyon, Professor of Biology (Emeritus) at San Francisco State University, was one of the leading chemical evolution theorists in the world.

He co-authored Biochemical Predestination, which claimed that the evolution of life was inevitable… that proteins to produce living cells were formed directly by forces of attraction between their parts… that proteins are just formed together (self-assemble) in chains, directly from amino acids, without any DNA assembly instructions.

His theory was accepted with enthusiasm by the evolutionary scientific community. But within just five years after publishing, Kenyon suddenly had serious doubts.

It began when one of his students asked, “How could the first proteins have been assembled without the help of genetic instructions?” (Proteins were the necessary information to build the first cell.)

And then DNA was discovered. This would prove fatal to Kenyon’s molecular evolution theory. Kenyon confesses:

The more I conducted my own studies, including a period of time at NASA-AIMS Research Center, the more it became apparent there were multiple difficulties with the chemical evolution account. And further experimental work showed that amino acids do not have the ability to order themselves into any biologically meaningful sequences.

The more I thought about the alternative that was being presented in the criticism, and the enormous problem that all of us who had worked on this field had neglected to address, the problem of the origin of genetic information itself, then I really had to re-assess my whole position regarding origins. (Ibid.)

What he now had to address was this: What was the source of the biological information in DNA?

If one could get at the origin of the messages, the encoded messages within the living machinery, then you would really be onto something far more intellectually satisfying than this chemical evolution theory. (Ibid.)

From Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Illustra Media)

The astonishing fact is that inside every microscopic-sized cell, machines work together to accomplish specific jobs and are shepherded by other specially shaped machines to precise locations where they are needed.

Learning this, Kenyon exclaimed, “This is absolutely mind-boggling, to perceive at this scale of size, such a finely tuned apparatus, a device, that bears the marks of intelligent design and manufacture!”

Observable evidence of a Master Designer
What else can you call this but observable evidence of thoughtful, programmed designing by a Superior Mind? Evidence of intelligently organized patterns.

Obviously, such a Designer can only be greater than us. Greater than the creation itself.

Music.in.genes
Oh, and something else. Did you know this? It was recently discovered that DNA is linked to music!

If you like music, but think that you can’t carry a tune, you may be wrong. Respected geneticist, Susumo Ono, believes he’s discovered music in genes – particularly human genes, fish genes and rabbit genes. Susumo is a researcher in DNA.

He asked himself, If we were to assign a musical note to each chemical on the DNA strand and string those notes together and play them, what would DNA sound like?

So, he did this – and the result was amazing. He discovered musical patterns of notes, that again reveal intelligence. Susumo Ono was so astonished that he took his findings to musicians. And musicians, in turn, were astonished to hear echoes of Bach, of Schubert, of Mozart in DNA music.

Using the same formula for converting DNA into music, Dr Ono worked backwards and translated Chopin’s funeral march into chemical symbols. It came out cancer!

Skeptics naturally point out that these strands of DNA produce only a string of single notes; it is the musicians who fill in the rhythm and the harmony.

That’s so. But the bottom line is this: Whichever way you look at it, the PATTERNS of single notes testify to intelligence as the source of DNA. Certainly, it is not from a blind, accidental force in nature.

Identical to written language
But there’s more, much more. Scientists at Bell Laboratories conducted studies on the mathematical language in the DNA molecule.

And what did they find? Its mathematical pattern is identical to that of conversational language.

Concerning DNA, Charles Thaxton states:

A structural identity has been discovered between the genetic message on DNA and the written messages of a human language. (Charles Thaxton, “A New Design Argument,” Cosmic Pursuit 1, no. 2, Spring 1998)

Hupert Yockey explains:
There is an identity of structure between DNA (and protein) and written linguistic messages. Since we know by experience that intelligence produces written messages, and no other cause is known, the implication, according to the abductive method, is that intelligent cause produced DNA and protein. The significance of this result lies in the security of it, for it is much stronger than if the structures were merely similar. We are not dealing with anything like a superficial resemblance between DNA and a written text. We are not saying DNA is like a message. Rather, DNA is a message. True design thus returns to biology. (Hubert P. Yockey, “Journal of Theoretic Biology”. Quoted in Charles Thaxton, “A New Design Argument,” Cosmic Pursuit 1, no. 2, Spring 1998. Emphasis mine.)

Since it takes intelligence to write a language, is it not evident that it took intelligence to write the DNA code?

Intelligently designed ‘sentences’ impressed from the ‘outside’
Dean Kenyon was asked if DNA comes in intelligently designed ‘sentences’. “Is it true that when scientists peer into the microscopic world of DNA, they find not mere random arrangements, but well-written ‘instruction books’?”

“Yes,” responded Kenyon. “Masterpieces of immense intricacy and subtlety.”

“And you argue that these biological ‘sentences’ in DNA could not have arisen merely by material means, as evolutionists suggest?” asked the interviewer.

“No,” said Kenyon. “Just as the chemistry and physics of ink and paper do not determine the order of symbols in a printed text, but that order must be impressed on the ink from the ‘outside’, so also the order of the bases, or sub-units, in DNA [adenine, thymine, guanine, and cytosine, or A, T, G, and C as commonly represented] is not determined by the known chemical tendencies of these individual sub-units, but instead appears to have been impressed from the ‘outside’ on the sub-units to create just those sequences that make biological sense.”

It takes three billion (3,000,000,000) of those letters to represent a copy of you.

There is one of those 3-billion-letter messages inside each cell in your body.

The fantastic complexity and orderliness of the DNA code – condensed into an incredibly tiny size – suggests the work of a brilliant intellect rather than chance processes. It suggests that much thought has gone into their design – just as human beings use intelligence to design and construct computers, Jumbo jets, space craft and other intricate equipment.

If radio signals were to be received from outer space, they would be understood as evidence of an intelligent source. Why then should we not regard the message sequence on the DNA molecule as prima facie evidence of an intelligent source?

Designed to NOT evolve
But that is not all! Gene code letters have built in error protection!

Genes store information in long strings of DNA, in the form of chemical letters, called A, T, C and G. So that genes can be accurately copied, each gene consists of two parallel strands of DNA held together by links between the code letters of one strand and those of the other strand. The two strands are not identical. That is, A’s do not link to A’s, and so on. Instead, they are complimentary. A’s link to T’s; C’s always link to G’s.

Donail MacDonaill of Trinity College, Dublin, studied that pattern of linkages between letters. And he found that they form a parity code similar to computer codes, to minimise mistakes during the electronic transfer of information. (Nature science update, www.nature.com/nsu September 18, 2002)

Now is the moment of truth. No one would be so naïve as to believe modern electronic parity codes could have evolved by chance. They were carefully planned by software designers. Could the parity code found in DNA be further evidence that the genetic code was deliberately created?

DNA is designed to maintain accurate copies and avoid changes in the information it carries. This means it was designed to NOT evolve. But rather to reproduce its own kind forever. Doesn’t this make evolution scientifically impossible? The genes of fruit flies were manipulated to produce flies with no eyes. When these were interbred their offspring also had no eyes. But after several generations’ eyes started to reappear due to this fail-safe mechanism, reverting back to a normal fly. In other words, no evolution!

A miracle – nothing less
Microbiologist Dr Michael Denton challenges the scientific community to address the impossibility of a single cell being thrown together, unless by an occurrence “indistinguishable from a miracle.” (Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda, Md.: Adler and Adler, 1986, p. 264)

Each nucleotide base (or letter) on one DNA strand interlocks with a specific partner on the other strand.

Together they then form a base pair of letters.

Three pairs of letters form a code for one amino acid.

The order in which the pairs are arranged on a DNA strand determines the information contained in that strand.

Genetic information is contained in the myriad combinations of pairs throughout the length of the DNA molecule.

A gene is a particular sequence of letters which codes for a specific protein.

Is it any wonder that mathematicians can have serious doubts about evolution? Mathematician I.L. Cohen, a member of New York Academy of Sciences, writes:

…any physical change of any size, shape or form is strictly the result of purposeful alignment of billions of nucleotides [in the DNA]. Nature or species do not have the capacity to rearrange them nor to add to them… The only way we know for a DNA to be altered is through a meaningful intervention from an outside source of intelligence – one who knows what it is doing, such as our genetic engineers are now performing in the laboratories. (I.L. Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong; A Study in Probabilities. New York Research Publications, Inc., 1984, p. 209)

He adds:

…every single concept advanced by the theory of evolution (and amended thereafter) is imaginary as it is not supported by the scientifically established facts of microbiology, fossils, and mathematical probability concepts. Darwin was wrong. (Ibid.)

…The theory of evolution may be the worst mistake made in science. (Ibid., p. 210)

The “simple” cell

The Forbidden Secret Part One – Evolution? Chapter 2 – Lottery (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
*Impossible* *odds* – COULD YOU WIN A $MILLION LOTTERY A MILLION TIMES? I used to love betting on horses. What excitement to buy a newspaper, work out a winning system… and listen to the race! To increase the excitement, I might sometimes go to the track. Those last few moments were so tense! Even with reasonable odds, I more often lost. But just take a look at these odds below! If they don’t propel you into outer space, I don’t know what will. First, let me tell you something that’s happening inside every cell of your wonderful body this very moment. Proteins: intelligence with no brains Proteins are workers inside the cell. Among other duties, proteins are the transporters within the cells. They are the stevedores that lug everything around. Who tells them what, where, when, and how much to carry? I will tell you the answer to that one, yet it only presents a bigger question: Another protein (often a constructor) moves over to the transporter, touches him momentarily, and the transporter then knows exactly what to get and how much is needed. Each protein is carefully assembled by another protein – which was itself assembled only a short time before. It does the assembling job from materials lying around. And it never makes a mistake. Who taught the protein how to assemble another protein? Each protein has a very complex structure. It is made up of hundreds of organic amino acids, arranged in a totally complicated order. There could be only one correct arrangement of each protein – yet there are millions of wrong ways it could be arranged. The utter randomness of evolution could never come up with the right combination for each protein. If the constructor protein finds he does not have the right amount and combination of amino acids lying around, he tells another protein to bring him some more! The messenger goes to the edge of the cell and tells the gatekeeper (another protein) to bring them in, which he does. This is going on millions of times a minute in every cell of your body. Each little protein molecule does the most fabulous things. It carries out complicated tasks which require great intelligence. The problem is there is not a nerve cell anywhere in its body. No brains. Armies of proteins carry out complicated series of actions. Every step is complex, yet the finished result is always perfect. I ask you, how can this be done, when different proteins which never meet each other take part in the different steps? As you know, none of the proteins lives very long. And none of them teaches the new proteins they construct how to do the work they are going to do! There are no classroom teachers in the cell, for all the students have no *brains, yet they know exactly what to do! And now consider this: Even if, just one time, evolution could produce one correct protein – how on earth could it keep repeating the fluke again and again, which it would* *have* to do in order to replicate that correct protein in making millions more of it? Something else. The simplest form of DNA complex is a virus. But for a virus to reproduce it needs to enter a living cell to utilize energy from mitochrondria and the *protein-producing* ability of the host cell. It is *unable* to *reproduce* on *its* *own.* Enzymes: mathematical odds Enzymes are proteins of high molecular weight. Sir Fred Hoyle and Professor Wickramasinghe write: Biochemical systems are exceedingly complex, so much so, that the chance of their being formed through random shufflings of simple organic molecules is exceedingly minute, to a point where it is insensibly different from zero. (F. Hoyle and C. Wickramasinghe, Evolution From Space. Dent, 1981, p. 3) They explain that there are perhaps 1080 (10, followed by 80 zeroes) atoms in the universe and 1017 seconds have elapsed since the alleged ‘big bang’. The number of independent enzymes necessary for life is about 2,000. The probability of building just one of these enzymes cannot be better than one in 1040000 This outrageously small probability could not be faced, even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup. If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training that life originated on Earth, this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court. (Ibid, p. 24) Fred Hoyle, writing in New Scientist, repeated that 2,000 different and very complex enzymes are required for a living organism to exist. Then he added that not a single one of these could be formed by random, shuffling processes in even 20 billion years! Our existence on earth is as if we had won a million-dollar lottery a million times in a row. Amino acids: impossible odds There are 20 amino acids. There are 300 amino acids in a specialized sequence in each medium protein. There are billions upon billions of possible combinations! The right combination from among the 20 amino acids would have to be brought together in the right sequence – in *order* to *make* *one* *usable* *protein.* The possible arrangements of the 20 amino acids is 2,500,000,000,000,000,000. If evolutionary theory is true, every protein arrangement in a life form has to be worked out by chance until it works right – first one combination and then another until one is found that works right. By then the organism will have long died, if it even had been alive! It’s becoming embarrassing… The sheer amount of speculation… the *myriad* *“blind* *chances”* needed to support the evolution thesis… I need a glass of water! All need to exist together, instantly! DNA only works because it has enzymes to help it; enzymes only work because there are protein chains; protein only works because of DNA; DNA only works because it is formed of protein chains. They all have to be there together, immediately, at the same time. But the enzymes only work because the protein chains are coded in a special sequence by DNA. DNA can only replicate with the help of protein enzymes. We are really in a chicken and egg situation. (E. Ambrose, The Nature and Origin of the Biological World, p. 135) Outmoded theory Yes, it appears we are now in the soup with this evolution theory. We are stuck with an outmoded mid-19th century idea that was devised when almost nothing was known about proteins, genetics, or microbiology. Do experiments suggest we could create life? Dean Kenyon is a fellow of the Discovery Institute’s Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture, an Intelligent Design think-tank based in Seattle, Washington. He is a Professor of Biology at San Francisco State University. He holds a PhD in biophysics from Stanford University. He has been a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of California at Berkeley, a visiting scholar at Trinity College, Oxford University, and a visiting Research Associate at NASA-Ames Research Center. The following extracts are from an interview he did with Benjamin Wiker. Wiker: According to the standard materialist account of evolution, billions and billions of years ago there was on earth a kind of chemical “soup” and from this lifeless soup somehow living things arose. What discoveries in particular led you to reject this account? Kenyon: The standard account has many flaws – not the least of which is the fact that there is no geochemical evidence for the existence of a prebiotic soup! Wiker: But how do you account for those experiments which supposedly showed that we can create the building blocks of life, amino acids, out of just such a chemical soup? Kenyon: Stanley Miller’s famous experiment, first performed in the early 1950s, presumably simulated the earth’s primitive atmosphere. Using a mixture of methane, ammonia, molecular hydrogen, and water vapor, and supplying energy with an electric discharge, he produced small amounts of a few amino acids and other substances which occur in living cells. But less well known is the fact that the dominant trend of the chemistry occurring in these experiments is toward non-biological material – that is, amber gunk which coats the inside of the apparatus. Moreover, such experiments routinely leave molecular oxygen out of the apparatus even though geological evidence suggests that oxygen may well have been present in the earth’s early atmosphere. Wiker: Why do they leave oxygen out of such experiments? Kenyon: If molecular oxygen is present, then it destroys, by oxidation, any biochemicals that form. Of course, we should add that if both hydrogen and oxygen are together in a mixture of gases supplied with electric sparks, the apparatus might explode! Wiker: So, the Miller-type experiment does not, in this regard, match the actual chemical environment of the early earth? Kenyon: Correct. In this instance, the oxygen is left out of the experiments because of a requirement of chemical evolution theory, not because we have evidence that it was absent from the primitive atmosphere. And there are many more difficulties. For example, the energy used to initiate the chemical reactions in these simulation experiments – electric sparks, ultraviolet and other types of radiation, heat – would actually have destroyed the more complex products they presume were created. The energy sources, rather than being creative, would have interacted with the presumed prebiotic carbon compounds in such a way that the destruction of chemicals would have predominated over their synthesis. Finally, we have no plausible naturalistic account of the prebiotic origin of genetic information – that is, of the origin of specific biologically meaningful linear sequences of nucleotides in DNA and RNA. These are just some of the reasons why I think the empirical case against a chemical evolutionary origin of life is overwhelming. Life created in the laboratory? But couldn’t life be created in the lab? After all, scientists have created some building blocks of life – amino acids. Not so fast! Firstly, it has been done by men with intelligence, under artificial laboratory conditions far different from those on the early earth. And secondly, amino acids are only a tiny part of the necessary components for life. It would be like claiming that accidental laboratory production of a speck of black ink proves that the Encyclopaedia Brittanica randomly evolved. Why Kenyon had to repudiate evolution Wiker: I’m taking it that it has not always been this way – that you were not always so skeptical about the claims of evolutionary theory. You were co-author of the best-selling, advanced textbook on chemical evolution in the 1970s. Kenyon: Yes, that’s right. I did postdoctoral research in Melvin Calvin’s lab at the University of California at Berkeley and collaborated there with Gary Steinman in writing Biochemical Predestination. It wasn’t until after I taught the evolution course at San Francisco State University for ten years that I began seriously to doubt the evolutionary account. I had growing doubts about the transition series of fossils and about the chemical evolution experiments – such as Miller’s – and became increasingly uncomfortable making the standard evolutionary claims to students because these claims could not be supported in the scientific literature. (Interview by Benjamin Wiker. Paper: A New Scientific Revolution) Some other honest scientists speak up Evolution theory is scientific? Where is the science? I can assure the reader the American Kennel Club would not certify an *ancestor* of *your* *dog* based on evidence such as paleontologists present. (Isaac V.Manly, M.D.,Harvard Medical School. God Made: A Medical Doctor Looks at the Reality. Joplin, MO.: College Press, 1994, pp. 15,117,228) I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked *the* *greatest* *deceit* in the history of science. When this happens, many people will pose the question: how did this ever happen? (Saltationist Soren Lovtrup, Professor of Embryol-ogy, University of Umea, Sweden. Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth. New York: Chapman Hall, 1987, p.422) So, we can sleep well tonight. Our children’s education is in the good hands and sticky fingers of honest “experts”. Now comes my next question to test the imaginations of these mighty thinkers…

The Forbidden Secret
Part One – Evolution?
Chapter 2 – Lottery
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

Impossible odds – COULD YOU WIN A $MILLION LOTTERY A MILLION TIMES?
I used to love betting on horses. What excitement to buy a newspaper, work out a winning system… and listen to the race! To increase the excitement, I might sometimes go to the track. Those last few moments were so tense! Even with reasonable odds, I more often lost.

But just take a look at these odds below! If they don’t propel you into outer space, I don’t know what will.

First, let me tell you something that’s happening inside every cell of your wonderful body this very moment.

Proteins: intelligence with no brains
Proteins are workers inside the cell.

Among other duties, proteins are the transporters within the cells. They are the stevedores that lug everything around. Who tells them what, where, when, and how much to carry?

I will tell you the answer to that one, yet it only presents a bigger question: Another protein (often a constructor) moves over to the transporter, touches him momentarily, and the transporter then knows exactly what to get and how much is needed.

Each protein is carefully assembled by another protein – which was itself assembled only a short time before. It does the assembling job from materials lying around. And it never makes a mistake.

Who taught the protein how to assemble another protein?

Each protein has a very complex structure. It is made up of hundreds of organic amino acids, arranged in a totally complicated order.

There could be only one correct arrangement of each protein – yet there are millions of wrong ways it could be arranged.

The utter randomness of evolution could never come up with the right combination for each protein.

If the constructor protein finds he does not have the right amount and combination of amino acids lying around, he tells another protein to bring him some more!

The messenger goes to the edge of the cell and tells the gatekeeper (another protein) to bring them in, which he does.

This is going on millions of times a minute in every cell of your body.

Each little protein molecule does the most fabulous things. It carries out complicated tasks which require great intelligence. The problem is there is not a nerve cell anywhere in its body. No brains.

Armies of proteins carry out complicated series of actions. Every step is complex, yet the finished result is always perfect.

I ask you, how can this be done, when different proteins which never meet each other take part in the different steps? As you know, none of the proteins lives very long. And none of them teaches the new proteins they construct how to do the work they are going to do! There are no classroom teachers in the cell, for all the students have no brains, yet they know exactly what to do!

And now consider this: Even if, just one time, evolution could produce one correct protein – how on earth could it keep repeating the fluke again and again, which it would have to do in order to replicate that correct protein in making millions more of it?

Something else. The simplest form of DNA complex is a virus. But for a virus to reproduce it needs to enter a living cell to utilize energy from mitochrondria and the protein-producing ability of the host cell. It is unable to reproduce on its own.

Enzymes: mathematical odds
Enzymes are proteins of high molecular weight. Sir Fred Hoyle and Professor Wickramasinghe write:

Biochemical systems are exceedingly complex, so much so, that the chance of their being formed through random shufflings of simple organic molecules is exceedingly minute, to a point where it is insensibly different from zero. (F. Hoyle and C. Wickramasinghe, Evolution From Space. Dent, 1981, p. 3)

They explain that there are perhaps 1080 (10, followed by 80 zeroes) atoms in the universe and 1017 seconds have elapsed since the alleged ‘big bang’. The number of independent enzymes necessary for life is about 2,000. The probability of building just one of these enzymes cannot be better than one in 1040000 This outrageously small probability could not be faced, even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup.

If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training that life originated on Earth, this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court. (Ibid, p. 24)

Fred Hoyle, writing in New Scientist, repeated that 2,000 different and very complex enzymes are required for a living organism to exist. Then he added that not a single one of these could be formed by random, shuffling processes in even 20 billion years!

Our existence on earth is as if we had won a million-dollar lottery a million times in a row.

Amino acids: impossible odds
There are 20 amino acids. There are 300 amino acids in a specialized sequence in each medium protein. There are billions upon billions of possible combinations! The right combination from among the 20 amino acids would have to be brought together in the right sequence – in order to make one usable protein.

The possible arrangements of the 20 amino acids is 2,500,000,000,000,000,000. If evolutionary theory is true, every protein arrangement in a life form has to be worked out by chance until it works right – first one combination and then another until one is found that works right.

By then the organism will have long died, if it even had been alive! It’s becoming embarrassing… The sheer amount of speculation… the myriad “blind chances” needed to support the evolution thesis… I need a glass of water!

All need to exist together, instantly!
DNA only works because it has enzymes to help it; enzymes only work because there are protein chains; protein only works because of DNA; DNA only works because it is formed of protein chains. They all have to be there together, immediately, at the same time.

But the enzymes only work because the protein chains are coded in a special sequence by DNA. DNA can only replicate with the help of protein enzymes. We are really in a chicken and egg situation. (E. Ambrose, The Nature and Origin of the Biological World, p. 135)

Outmoded theory
Yes, it appears we are now in the soup with this evolution theory. We are stuck with an outmoded mid-19th century idea that was devised when almost nothing was known about proteins, genetics, or microbiology.

Do experiments suggest we could create life?
Dean Kenyon is a fellow of the Discovery Institute’s Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture, an Intelligent Design think-tank based in Seattle, Washington. He is a Professor of Biology at San Francisco State University. He holds a PhD in biophysics from Stanford University. He has been a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of California at Berkeley, a visiting scholar at Trinity College, Oxford University, and a visiting Research Associate at NASA-Ames Research Center.

The following extracts are from an interview he did with Benjamin Wiker.

Wiker: According to the standard materialist account of evolution, billions and billions of years ago there was on earth a kind of chemical “soup” and from this lifeless soup somehow living things arose. What discoveries in particular led you to reject this account?

Kenyon: The standard account has many flaws – not the least of which is the fact that there is no geochemical evidence for the existence of a prebiotic soup!

Wiker: But how do you account for those experiments which supposedly showed that we can create the building blocks of life, amino acids, out of just such a chemical soup?

Kenyon: Stanley Miller’s famous experiment, first performed in the early 1950s, presumably simulated the earth’s primitive atmosphere. Using a mixture of methane, ammonia, molecular hydrogen, and water vapor, and supplying energy with an electric discharge, he produced small amounts of a few amino acids and other substances which occur in living cells.

But less well known is the fact that the dominant trend of the chemistry occurring in these experiments is toward non-biological material – that is, amber gunk which coats the inside of the apparatus.

Moreover, such experiments routinely leave molecular oxygen out of the apparatus even though geological evidence suggests that oxygen may well have been present in the earth’s early atmosphere.

Wiker: Why do they leave oxygen out of such experiments?

Kenyon: If molecular oxygen is present, then it destroys, by oxidation, any biochemicals that form. Of course, we should add that if both hydrogen and oxygen are together in a mixture of gases supplied with electric sparks, the apparatus might explode!

Wiker: So, the Miller-type experiment does not, in this regard, match the actual chemical environment of the early earth?

Kenyon: Correct. In this instance, the oxygen is left out of the experiments because of a requirement of chemical evolution theory, not because we have evidence that it was absent from the primitive atmosphere.

And there are many more difficulties. For example, the energy used to initiate the chemical reactions in these simulation experiments – electric sparks, ultraviolet and other types of radiation, heat – would actually have destroyed the more complex products they presume were created.

The energy sources, rather than being creative, would have interacted with the presumed prebiotic carbon compounds in such a way that the destruction of chemicals would have predominated over their synthesis.

Finally, we have no plausible naturalistic account of the prebiotic origin of genetic information – that is, of the origin of specific biologically meaningful linear sequences of nucleotides in DNA and RNA.

These are just some of the reasons why I think the empirical case against a chemical evolutionary origin of life is overwhelming.

Life created in the laboratory?
But couldn’t life be created in the lab? After all, scientists have created some building blocks of life – amino acids.

Not so fast! Firstly, it has been done by men with intelligence, under artificial laboratory conditions far different from those on the early earth. And secondly, amino acids are only a tiny part of the necessary components for life. It would be like claiming that accidental laboratory production of a speck of black ink proves that the Encyclopaedia Brittanica randomly evolved.

Why Kenyon had to repudiate evolution
Wiker: I’m taking it that it has not always been this way – that you were not always so skeptical about the claims of evolutionary theory. You were co-author of the best-selling, advanced textbook on chemical evolution in the 1970s.

Kenyon: Yes, that’s right.

I did postdoctoral research in Melvin Calvin’s lab at the University of California at Berkeley and collaborated there with Gary Steinman in writing Biochemical Predestination.

It wasn’t until after I taught the evolution course at San Francisco State University for ten years that I began seriously to doubt the evolutionary account.

I had growing doubts about the transition series of fossils and about the chemical evolution experiments – such as Miller’s – and became increasingly uncomfortable making the standard evolutionary claims to students because these claims could not be supported in the scientific literature. (Interview by Benjamin Wiker. Paper: A New Scientific Revolution)

Some other honest scientists speak up
Evolution theory is scientific? Where is the science? I can assure the reader the American Kennel Club would not certify an ancestor of your dog based on evidence such as paleontologists present. (Isaac V.Manly, M.D.,Harvard Medical School. God Made: A Medical Doctor Looks at the Reality. Joplin, MO.: College Press, 1994, pp. 15,117,228)

I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science. When this happens, many people will pose the question: how did this ever happen? (Saltationist Soren Lovtrup, Professor of Embryol-ogy, University of Umea, Sweden. Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth. New York: Chapman Hall, 1987, p.422)

So, we can sleep well tonight. Our children’s education is in the good hands and sticky fingers of honest “experts”.

Now comes my next question to test the imaginations of these mighty thinkers…

The Forbidden Secret Part One – Evolution? Chapter 3 – Origin of the Universe (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
*How* *did* *information* *evolve? – ORIGIN* OF THE UNIVERSE “Keep it up, boy!” Little Jamie bent down again and tugged on his shoelaces. He pulled and pulled until he was out of breath. “Why can’t I pull myself off the ground?” he cried in frustration. Well, you know the answer to that. If you pull up on your bootstraps for ten trillion years you still won’t lift yourself off the ground. The law of gravity stops you. So here were two questions niggling at my mind: 1. Firstly, were the Laws of the Conservation of Energy and of Matter *suspended* long enough for Empty Space to give birth to a.rock? 2. Secondly, would the rock get wet (for no reason), and then give birth to an amoeba? Er, yeah… sure it would, if you sort of screwed up your eyes and crossed your fingers!? No one disputes that the origin of the universe involved physical matter *appearing* *from* *nothing. Yet there is no scientific mechanism that could have caused it to occur. But physical matter has appeared. Because we are here! Pure lottery. What if a billion, billion, billion black balls were mixed together with one white ball, and I had to reach, blindfolded, and pick out the white one? What if my life depended on it? Pick out that white one or be killed. If I reached, blindfolded into those zillions of black balls and discovered I had pulled out the one and only white ball… yes, I would rightly suspect that the whole thing was rigged. I pulled it out by pure accident. What do you think? Wouldn’t you call me nuts if I told you I picked it first time by chance! Origin* of life But that’s not all. What about the odds of *life* happening? Mathematically, it was simply impossible. When you consider the *hundreds* of factors required to produce life or even a planet capable of sustaining life as we know it – factors as diverse as the decay rates of elements and the distance of a planet’s orbit to its sun – and multiply them by the scientific and mathematical odds of those factors being right, it just doesn’t work. We *shouldn’t* be *here.* That brings to mind something that Sir Fred Hoyle said. That honored British astronomer calculated that the odds of only *one* factor necessary for life coming together by chance – the enzymes needed to perform the chemical functions needed to produce the most simple living creature – were one in 1040,000. That’s mathematical shorthand for 10 followed by 40,000 zeros, enough to fill 20 pages of this book…000000000000 and so on. (For perspective, mathematicians consider any probability of less than one in 1050 to be impossible.) 1. Did DNA just evolve? Now just consider the *origin* of one living cell. What were the odds of *the* *first* *simple* *cell* forming? Just ask a statistician. Produce a simple cell by chance? You are living in a dream world, he’ll reply. Do you know what you’re asking? Even the simplest cell you can conceive of would require no less than 100,000 DNA base pairs and a minimum of about 10,000 amino acids, to form the essential protein chain. Not to mention the other things that would also be necessary for the first cell. Bear in mind that *every* single base pair in the DNA chain has to have the same molecular orientation (“left-hand” or “right hand”)? As well as that, virtually *all* the amino acids must have the opposite orientation. And *every* *one* must be without error. Every single one of the ten thousand. Now, to randomly obtain those correct orientations, do you know your chances? It would be 1 chance in 2110,000, or 1 chance in 1033,113! To put it another way, if you attempted a trillion, trillion, trillion combinations every second for 15 billion years, the odds you would achieve all the correct orientations would still only be one chance in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion … and the trillions would continue 2755 times! It would be like winning more than 4700 state lotteries in a row with only a single ticket purchased for each. In other words…*impossible.* Would you please read that over again carefully and think about it? 2. How is ‘life’ added? But to orientate the molecules correctly is *just* *one* of the hurdles to be overcome for life to appear randomly. Here’s another: *How* do *you* *add* *‘life’* to non-living matter? And that’s only for the first, simplest cell. You still have the problem of the developing of more than 1.7 million highly complex species…. With even greater odds against it happening. As a statistician will assure you, random evolution is utterly impossible. At school we were taught about the “simple cell”… Oh go on!… we have now discovered it to be more complex than New York’s vast transportation network at rush hour. To appear accidentally was a *mathematical* *absurdity. We’ve already noted this, but a brief review is in order here. The DNA machinery* inside each cell had to be totally *100* *percent* *intact* with all its interlocking, working parts, *before* *one* *living* *cell* could even exist. Fascinating, you might say. But just wait till its implications hit you… Firstly, DNA comes in *intelligently* *designed* *sentences. It is not LIKE a language. It IS a language. Much thought has gone into the design of the DNA code. Secondly, this molecular machine has the ability* to *make* *functional* *copies* of *itself. And to do this it would have* to be extremely complex. Thirdly, the DNA molecule which tells every part of the cell “city” which different job to do, is the most complex storage system in the known universe. Fourthly, in every cell, microscopic-sized factories endlessly retrieve, process and store food. And highly efficient power plants burn the food to produce and store energy – all without over-heating the delicate temperature-sensitive machinery. 3. How did the first information evolve? Each of these things needs to receive information on how to do its job. That’s a gigantic hurdle… *information. How did genetic information evolve? And where did it come from, in the first place? From dead matter? That was the very question that would finally stump me. I ask you, how on earth could this complex coded information evolve, instantly* *perfect? Do you have the answer to that? A world leader in the field of “information science” was Dr Werner Gitt, a director and professor at the German Federal Institute of Physics and Technology. According to Dr Gitt, science makes one fact absolutely certain: information cannot emerge from disorder by chance. It always* *takes* a *greater* *source* of information to produce information. And ultimately, information is the result of intelligence. (“How Would You Answer?” <www.answersingenesis.org/docs/ 3270. asp#r16>, March 13, 2003) A code system is always the result of a mental process (it requires an intelligent origin or inventor)…. It should be emphasized that matter as such is unable to generate any code. All experiences indicate that a *thinking* *being* voluntarily exercising his own free will, cognition, and creativity, is required. (Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information. Bielenfeld, Germany: Christliche Literatur-Verbreitung, pp. 64-67. Emphasis mine) There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this. (Ibid., p. 79) Bad news for evolution? As if that wasn’t enough… Just factor this in. Simultaneously, you would need a totally functional system able and ready to *write,* *read* *and* *use* that information. In other words, · the writing mechanism, · the reading mechanism, and · the mechanism to use it, these *must* *all* be *present* at *the* *same* *very* *first* *moment* that the information appears. If one of these components is missing, the whole system will fail to work. Here was a case of “irreducible complexity”. Could this just happen? Could mere chemicals just on their own change into living systems? Not a snowflake’s chance. How much information? Do you have any idea as to how much information is continuously programming, constructing and reproducing your body? For starters, your body contains 75 trillion or more cells. Just suppose that you could stretch out and join up all the DNA in those cells end to end, do you know how far that would reach? Get this: 94 billion (not million, but billion) miles. Or 150 billion kilometers. That’s a thousand times the distance from the earth to the sun. Or 3½ million times around our earth’s equator! It would take a beam of light 5½ days to travel that far. Does that make your head spin? If all the DNA in just your body was placed end to end, that’s how far it would reach! No kidding. Read the last paragraph again. Okay, then, what is the probability of *just* *one* – *just* *one* – *just* *one* – of *those* *DNA* *molecules* forming by chance? The late astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle put it this way: Now imagine 1050 blind persons [that’s 100,000 billion billion billion billion billion people – standing shoulder to shoulder, they would more than fill our entire solar system] each with a scrambled Rubik cube and try to conceive of the chance of them all simultaneously arriving at the solved form. You then have the chance of arriving by random shuffling [random variation] at just one of the many biopolymers on which life depends. The notion that not only the biopolymers but the operating program of a living cell could be arrived at by chance in a primordial soup here on Earth is evidently nonsense of a high order. (Fred Hoyle, “The Big Bang in Astronomy,” New Scientist, vol. 92, no. 1280, November 19, 1981, p. 527) It has been estimated that the 3 billion letters of information in just one human cell of DNA are equivalent to 1,000 encyclopedia-sized books of information. (“Human/Chimp DNA Similarity,” <www.answersingene sis.org/docs/2453.asp#f6>, March 13, 2003) Optimum design perfection Oh, something else. The DNA code for information storage and translation contains the ideal number of genetic letters. This threw me. You see, the copying mechanism of DNA, to meet maximum effectiveness, requires the number of letters in each word to be an *even* *number. Of all possible mathematical combinations, the ideal number for storage and transcription has been calculated to be four* letters. And this is exactly what has been found in the genes of every living thing on earth – a four-letter digital code. “The coding system used for living human beings is *optimal* *from* an *engineering* *standpoint.* This suggests it is a case of purposeful design rather than a [lucky] chance.” (Dr Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, p. 95. Emphasis mine) Here, then, is what I have found myself needing to face: Scientists have *never* observed chemicals forming themselves into complex DNA molecules. 2. Life *cannot* arise spontaneously from non-life. 3. The simplest living organisms show *irreducible complexity.* 4. DNA molecules do *not* produce new genetic information. They only reproduce it. The bottom line is this: There are no *natural* *processes* that could account for it… no *scientific* *mechanism* that could have caused it to occur. Sorry, skeptics. That leaves you and me with only one rational alternative… that *the* *first* *life* must have been designed, then created. 1. Such organisms were *fully* *formed* *from* *the* *first* *moment* they appeared. 2. The first life must have been *programmed, like a computer chip, with the original code (or life-information) loaded into it by the designer. So, life was deliberately* *created? Well, then, after life was created, did evolution follow? Did an original living organism evolve upward into the many varieties we have today? Let’s investigate… Editor’s Note:* We do not listen to video links or read print material that is linked to items we print, so we may or may not agree with those links. We only look at print material that is sent to us for print. Laura Lee

The Forbidden Secret
Part One – Evolution?
Chapter 3 – Origin of the Universe
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

How did information evolve? – ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE
“Keep it up, boy!” Little Jamie bent down again and tugged on his shoelaces. He pulled and pulled until he was out of breath.

“Why can’t I pull myself off the ground?” he cried in frustration.

Well, you know the answer to that. If you pull up on your bootstraps for ten trillion years you still won’t lift yourself off the ground. The law of gravity stops you.

So here were two questions niggling at my mind:

1. Firstly, were the Laws of the Conservation of Energy and of Matter suspended long enough for Empty Space to give birth to a.rock?

2. Secondly, would the rock get wet (for no reason), and then give birth to an amoeba?

Er, yeah… sure it would, if you sort of screwed up your eyes and crossed your fingers!?

No one disputes that the origin of the universe involved physical matter appearing from nothing. Yet there is no scientific mechanism that could have caused it to occur.

But physical matter has appeared. Because we are here!

Pure lottery. What if a billion, billion, billion black balls were mixed together with one white ball, and I had to reach, blindfolded, and pick out the white one? What if my life depended on it? Pick out that white one or be killed.

If I reached, blindfolded into those zillions of black balls and discovered I had pulled out the one and only white ball… yes, I would rightly suspect that the whole thing was rigged.

I pulled it out by pure accident. What do you think? Wouldn’t you call me nuts if I told you I picked it first time by chance!

Origin of life
But that’s not all. What about the odds of life happening? Mathematically, it was simply impossible. When you consider the hundreds of factors required to produce life or even a planet capable of sustaining life as we know it – factors as diverse as the decay rates of elements and the distance of a planet’s orbit to its sun – and multiply them by the scientific and mathematical odds of those factors being right, it just doesn’t work. We shouldn’t be here.

That brings to mind something that Sir Fred Hoyle said. That honored British astronomer calculated that the odds of only one factor necessary for life coming together by chance – the enzymes needed to perform the chemical functions needed to produce the most simple living creature – were one in 1040,000.
That’s mathematical shorthand for 10 followed by 40,000 zeros, enough to fill 20 pages of this book…000000000000 and so on.

(For perspective, mathematicians consider any probability of less than one in 1050 to be impossible.)

1. Did DNA just evolve?
Now just consider the origin of one living cell.

What were the odds of the first simple cell forming? Just ask a statistician.

Produce a simple cell by chance? You are living in a dream world, he’ll reply. Do you know what you’re asking?

Even the simplest cell you can conceive of would require no less than 100,000 DNA base pairs and a minimum of about 10,000 amino acids, to form the essential protein chain. Not to mention the other things that would also be necessary for the first cell.

Bear in mind that every single base pair in the DNA chain has to have the same molecular orientation (“left-hand” or “right hand”)? As well as that, virtually all the amino acids must have the opposite orientation. And every one must be without error. Every single one of the ten thousand.

Now, to randomly obtain those correct orientations, do you know your chances? It would be 1 chance in 2110,000, or 1 chance in 1033,113!

To put it another way, if you attempted a trillion, trillion, trillion combinations every second for 15 billion years, the odds you would achieve all the correct orientations would still only be one chance in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion … and the trillions would continue 2755 times!

It would be like winning more than 4700 state lotteries in a row with only a single ticket purchased for each. In other words…impossible. Would you please read that over again carefully and think about it?

2. How is ‘life’ added?
But to orientate the molecules correctly is just one of the hurdles to be overcome for life to appear randomly.

Here’s another: How do you add ‘life’ to non-living matter?

And that’s only for the first, simplest cell. You still have the problem of the developing of more than 1.7 million highly complex species…. With even greater odds against it happening. As a statistician will assure you, random evolution is utterly impossible.

At school we were taught about the “simple cell”… Oh go on!… we have now discovered it to be more complex than New York’s vast transportation network at rush hour. To appear accidentally was a mathematical absurdity.

We’ve already noted this, but a brief review is in order here.

The DNA machinery inside each cell had to be totally 100 percent intact with all its interlocking, working parts, before one living cell could even exist.

Fascinating, you might say. But just wait till its implications hit you…

Firstly, DNA comes in intelligently designed sentences. It is not LIKE a language. It IS a language. Much thought has gone into the design of the DNA code.

Secondly, this molecular machine has the ability to make functional copies of itself. And to do this it would have to be extremely complex.

Thirdly, the DNA molecule which tells every part of the cell “city” which different job to do, is the most complex storage system in the known universe.

Fourthly, in every cell, microscopic-sized factories endlessly retrieve, process and store food. And highly efficient power plants burn the food to produce and store energy – all without over-heating the delicate temperature-sensitive machinery.

3. How did the first information evolve?
Each of these things needs to receive information on how to do its job. That’s a gigantic hurdle…

information.
How did genetic information evolve? And where did it come from, in the first place? From dead matter? That was the very question that would finally stump me.

I ask you, how on earth could this complex coded information evolve, instantly perfect? Do you have the answer to that?

A world leader in the field of “information science” was Dr Werner Gitt, a director and professor at the German Federal Institute of Physics and Technology. According to Dr Gitt, science makes one fact absolutely certain: information cannot emerge from disorder by chance. It always takes a greater source of information to produce information. And ultimately, information is the result of intelligence. (“How Would You Answer?” <www.answersingenesis.org/docs/ 3270. asp#r16>, March 13, 2003)

A code system is always the result of a mental process (it requires an intelligent origin or inventor)…. It should be emphasized that matter as such is unable to generate any code. All experiences indicate that a thinking being voluntarily exercising his own free will, cognition, and creativity, is required. (Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information. Bielenfeld, Germany: Christliche Literatur-Verbreitung, pp. 64-67. Emphasis mine)

There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this. (Ibid., p. 79)

Bad news for evolution?

As if that wasn’t enough… Just factor this in. Simultaneously, you would need a totally functional system able and ready to write, read and use that information. In other words,
· the writing mechanism,
· the reading mechanism, and · the mechanism to use it,
these must all be present at the same very first moment that the information appears. If one of these components is missing, the whole system will fail to work. Here was a case of “irreducible complexity”.

Could this just happen? Could mere chemicals just on their own change into living systems? Not a snowflake’s chance.

How much information?
Do you have any idea as to how much information is continuously programming, constructing and reproducing your body?

For starters, your body contains 75 trillion or more cells. Just suppose that you could stretch out and join up all the DNA in those cells end to end, do you know how far that would reach? Get this: 94 billion (not million, but billion) miles. Or 150 billion kilometers. That’s a thousand times the distance from the earth to the sun. Or 3½ million times around our earth’s equator! It would take a beam of light 5½ days to travel that far.

Does that make your head spin? If all the DNA in just your body was placed end to end, that’s how far it would reach! No kidding. Read the last paragraph again.

Okay, then, what is the probability of just one – just one – just one – of those DNA molecules forming by chance? The late astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle put it this way:

Now imagine 1050 blind persons [that’s 100,000 billion billion billion billion billion people – standing shoulder to shoulder, they would more than fill our entire solar system] each with a scrambled Rubik cube and try to conceive of the chance of them all simultaneously arriving at the solved form. You then have the chance of arriving by random shuffling [random variation] at just one of the many biopolymers on which life depends. The notion that not only the biopolymers but the operating program of a living cell could be arrived at by chance in a primordial soup here on Earth is evidently nonsense of a high order. (Fred Hoyle, “The Big Bang in Astronomy,” New Scientist, vol. 92, no. 1280, November 19, 1981, p. 527)

It has been estimated that the 3 billion letters of information in just one human cell of DNA are equivalent to 1,000 encyclopedia-sized books of information. (“Human/Chimp DNA Similarity,” <www.answersingene sis.org/docs/2453.asp#f6>, March 13, 2003)

Optimum design perfection
Oh, something else. The DNA code for information storage and translation contains the ideal number of genetic letters.

This threw me. You see, the copying mechanism of DNA, to meet maximum effectiveness, requires the number of letters in each word to be an even number. Of all possible mathematical combinations, the ideal number for storage and transcription has been calculated to be four letters.

And this is exactly what has been found in the genes of every living thing on earth – a four-letter digital code. “The coding system used for living human beings is optimal from an engineering standpoint. This suggests it is a case of purposeful design rather than a [lucky] chance.” (Dr Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, p. 95. Emphasis mine)

Here, then, is what I have found myself needing to face:

Scientists have never observed chemicals forming themselves into complex DNA molecules.
2. Life cannot arise spontaneously from non-life.
3. The simplest living organisms show irreducible complexity.
4. DNA molecules do not produce new genetic information. They only reproduce it.

The bottom line is this: There are no natural processes that could account for it… no scientific mechanism that could have caused it to occur.

Sorry, skeptics. That leaves you and me with only one rational alternative… that the first life must have been designed, then created.

1. Such organisms were fully formed from the first moment they appeared.
2. The first life must have been programmed, like a computer chip, with the original code (or life-information) loaded into it by the designer.

So, life was deliberately created?

Well, then, after life was created, did evolution follow? Did an original living organism evolve upward into the many varieties we have today?

Let’s investigate…

Editor’s Note:
We do not listen to video links or read print material that is linked to items we print, so we may or may not agree with those links. We only look at print material that is sent to us for print. Laura Lee

The Forbidden Secret Part One – Evolution? Chapter 4 – Mutations (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
*Mutations,* *natural* *selection,* *and* *variations* – MAKING EVOLUTION POSSIBLE? Jack’s business was selling raincoats. He bought them for $69, then sold them for $62.50 “If I sell enough of them, I’ll be able to upgrade to a new car,” he said. What was wrong with Jack’s plan? Of course you know! A business can’t make money by losing a little at a time. And what has this to do with our subject? You’ll see… The thought arises, perhaps DNA *was* created, but then after that evolution took over? How? By mutations, dummy! Isn’t that what we were taught in school? Mutations do not add information needed for evolution Okay, stop right there. Mutations? What are they, anyway? If you didn’t know, mutations are genetic *copying* *mistakes!* Mistakes? That’s right. Copying mistakes. Now, please help me here, if I’m missing something. Do you honestly think that *mistakes* would *produce* the intelligent *organized* *information* required for evolution? You want it straight? There’s no need to guess. There is *observational* *evidence.* And it says no. OBSERVED FACT ABOUT MUTATIONS: In every case known to science, there has been a *loss* of *genetic* *information.* Wake up, Suzie! We now know that DNA molecules do *not* *produce* new genetic information. They only *reproduce* it. Confirmed? Yes. As Dr Lee Spetner, a former biophysicist and professor, information theory specialist, at John Hopkins University, reveals: All point mutations that have been studied on the molecular level turn out to reduce the genetic information and not to increase it. (Lee Spetner, Not by Chance. Brooklyn, NY.: The Judaica Press Inc., 1997, p. 138) Information cannot be built up by mutations that lose it. A business *can’t* *make* *money* by *losing* a *little* at a *time. (Ibid.,* p. 143. Emphasis added) Well, who could argue with that? Inherited back-up template can correct mutations As I was mulling over this, there came the shocking news of a discovery made by plant scientists at Purdue University. Well, what had the scientists discovered? It was a plant containing a template – that is, a master genetic blueprint – that *can* *correct* *defective* *genes* *inherited* *from* *its* *parents.* What! Yes, it’s true. They examined the offspring of two mutant plants which had a malfunctioning gene. And they found that 10 percent of their offspring don’t have this malformation but rather are like the normal (non-mutant) grandparents. As New York Times science reporter Nicholas Wade announced: The discovery also raises interesting biological questions – including whether it gets in the way of evolution, which depends on mutations changing an organism rather than being put right by a backup system…. The finding poses a puzzle for evolutionary theory because it corrects mutations which evolution depends on as generators of novelty [new features]. (“Startling Scientists, Plant Fixes Its Flawed Genes,” New York Times, March 23, 2005) Even Robert Pruitt, the discoverer of the phenomenon, was puzzled. As he admitted: This challenges everything we believe… It seems that these [mutant gene]-containing plants keep a cryptic copy of everything that was in the previous generation, even though it doesn’t show up in the DNA, it’s not in the chromosome. Some other type of gene sequence information that we don’t really understand yet is modifying the inherited traits. (Quoted by Susan Steeves, “Plants Defy Mendel’s Inheritance Laws, May Prompt Textbook Changes”, Purdue News Services) Scientists do not yet know how many living organisms contain this master back-up copy. But the search has begun. I can tell you this. One will be hard pressed to explain how such a mechanism could have been created in a Darwinian step-by-step fashion – and inherited not from parents, but from grandparents or distant ancestors! We noted earlier that there is a complex mechanism within the DNA of every cell that corrects mutations. Remember the flies that lost eyes and got them back again after several generations? Mutation only within the species And, in any case, when a mutation occurs, the change is still within the DNA of the species. The change is *within* the basic type of organism, *not* *transferred* *from* *one* *basic* *type* *into* *another.* If half developed: no survival value You know as well as I. Of the many thousands of living things, *every* *one* is today *perfectly* *designed* for its environment. There is a happy state of dependability and workability throughout nature. And it is persistently so. Does anyone want to quibble over that? So, do you mind me asking, if evolution is occurring now, where is it? I’ve looked high and low. There should be thousands of partly evolved features. There are none! Not one life form has a half developed organ, or an organ superfluous to its needs. Nothing is unfitted, or out of place. Instead, what do we see? Thousands of amazing creatures doing highly specialized jobs that *demonstrate* *intelligence* – which they *don’t* *have. Not only that, they also possess highly specialized organs which are vital to their survival – organs which could not* possibly be the outcome of long and gradual ‘chance mutations’. Common sense tells us that these millions of ‘specialized organs’ are so highly complex that to be useful and functional, every one of their interlocking parts had to *all* come into existence at once. You don’t need to be smart to realize that numerous precision components *had* to *work* *perfectly* *from* *the* *very* *start* of any organism’s existence. No process of gradual change from generation to generation could ever create any apparatus with all its *inter-dependent* *working* *parts. Not until the entire* mechanism was complete would the arrangement have any practical value to an animal or plant. Meanwhile, mutations which led to the useless intermediate stages, having no *survival* *value,* would be *removed* by the so-called “natural selection” process. And the final, complete mechanism would never have been able to appear. We’ve already referred to the term “*irreducible* *complexity”* – which means that systems needed to appear in an organism already *complete* if they were to function at all. When you think about it, there’s nothing really simple. Even the simple mousetrap is a combination of several different things – a block of wood, the spring latch and the hammer. If one is missing, the mousetrap is useless. Evolution theory would require that each element of the mousetrap developed on its own, separately. But how could that make sense? Because the trap wouldn’t work *without* *all* three parts there at the *start. Have you ever studied the human eye? It’s not simple like that mousetrap. The eye is made up of millions* of *parts* – the pupil, lens, muscles, optic nerve, and millions of rods and cones. All parts were needed at once. So how did that come about? Could evolution answer this? Yeah. And pigs will fly. To design something like an eye you’d need a clever-minded engineer. Again, Michael Behe, a biochemist at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explained that information is primarily an *instruction* *manual:* Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in *one* of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, ‘Take a ¼ inch nut,’ a mutation might say, ‘Take a 3/8 inch nut.’ Or instead of ‘Place the round peg in the round hole,’ we might get ‘Place the round peg in the square hole’… What a mutation *cannot* do is change all the instructions in one step – say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio. (Michael Behe, Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41) What about “punctuated equilibrium”? The theory goes like this. Perhaps the major evolutionary changes occurred quite rapidly, while the population levels were low. So, the gaps might be due to such periods of ‘explosive evolution’, which occurred so rapidly they left no trace in the fossils. In other words, extremely fast evolution occurred in small, isolated communities. So, it was NOT recorded in the fossil strata. In that case, evidence should not even be expected. Um, okay. Great theory. But evidence? Can’t find a shred of physical evidence for it. Frankly, it’s an argument from silence. You just have to trust it by faith. You are probably going to tell me that a theory which predicts it will have no evidence hardly qualifies as a scientific theory. And I must agree with you. Punctuated equilibrium doesn’t even have a mechanism. Even the promoters themselves admit that. You mean experiments have not been able to show any means by which evolutionary jumps can occur? Not one. So, it’s *not* *scientific* *observation. We’re asked to believe that evolution occurs so slowly today that we cannot detect it, and so rapidly in the past that we cannot detect it! Then I came upon a copy of Science* News. The report mentioned how the AIDS virus was shown to mutate up to a million times faster than the DNA for other organisms. So, in one year the virus went through the equivalent of 1 million years of mutation at the usual rate. (Science News, June 28, 1986, p. 410) Great! Here’s a good way to test the “punctuated equilibrium” theory. Here’s an example of what would actually happen if very fast development *did* occur in a small, isolated community, as some have suggested. Hopefully this helps the theory? Oh, bother! Even with the mutation process speeded up a million times, the AIDS virus only ‘evolved’ into another form of AIDS virus and nothing else. (Ibid.) Now you know. This observed evidence actually *refutes* the idea of *punctuated* *equilibrium.* Darn it! Fossil evidence shows the same for other creatures that experience numerous mutations in a short period. The first spiders mutated and selected into the forms they have today. They remain spiders. And the same with everything else. Here is no joy for “punctuated equilibrium” as a means of evolution. Punctuated equilibrium? That’s the kind of evolution you have when you don’t actually have any evolution! Does that leave you with a kind of empty feeling inside? My final question on punctuated equilibrium is this: Just how could these big jumps occur genetically? How could the *genetic* *code* *for* *fully* *functioning* *organs* suddenly appear out of nowhere? What about natural selection? We all know that variation exists among living forms. Variations are the result of what we call *natural* *selection.* What is natural selection? It is the process by which heritable traits are *selected* *from* the parent gene pool, that make it more likely for an organism to survive in a particular circumstance. There’s an oft-recited myth that natural selection is “the mechanism by which evolution occurs.” Why a myth? Because of…INFORMATION. Since information *cannot* be *added, then at the very start,* the parents must have possessed *enough* *variety* of *information* so their descendants could *select* what was needed to help them adapt to a wide variety of environments. For example, antibiotic resistance, or long beaks may become dominant features in generations that follow. But, bad luck… *the* *gene* *pool* *has* *been* *reduced.* Why? Because it is a selecting of only *some* of the parents’ gene pool. Thus, the original information is thereby reduced, and *that* is *the* *opposite* of *evolution.* But let facts get in the way? Never. This evolution theory has become an institution. (And some say that’s where it belongs.) Variations = evolution? No! In every case, the descendants, despite all their variations, continue to be of the same basic type. The DNA ensures that. All today’s dog breeds came from an original dog. And that original dog possessed all of the genetic information required to produce the varieties of dogs we now see. But all its descendants, no matter what their appearance, are still – every one of them – dogs. No amount of variation will mutate a dog into a horse, or anything else. So, is *variation* evolution? Another disappointment. It’s not evolution, but adaptation. What about when some varieties become extinct and others survive? Sorry, *extinction* is *not* *evolution. The bottom line is that the information has been reduced. The gene pool has been reduced.* And that is the *opposite* of *evolution.* Total re-design needed For one creature to change into the other (for example, a reptile into a winged bird) is not a modification, it is a *cancelling* of one perfect design and *starting* with another. And if only *part* of the new design system is complete, then the total organism will fail to function. In that single lifetime it would become extinct. *Inter-dependence* of every part – we cannot shrug this away. Do similarities prove evolution? But what about similar design of body parts shared by different creatures? Isn’t this a hint of a common evolutionary ancestor? As an intelligent person, just think it through. Again, the answer is: OF COURSE NOT! Common sense tells us that similar parts more likely had a *common* *designer. And an efficient design will be used constantly. If a wheel is useful for a motor car, a wheel will also be useful for a skateboard, or a bicycle. The skateboard did not beget the car. Quick* summary DON’T VARIATIONS PROVE EVOLUTION? No. Whether mutations or natural selection, they only reduce the information to each new variety. They do not add information for upward evolution to occur. DON’T SIMILARITIES PROVE EVOLUTION? No. Parts similarity only indicates an efficient design – and very likely a common designer. In any case, for evolution to happen, you need two essentials: 1. a CODE to direct evolution, and 2. an ENABLING MECHANISM. But neither of these has been discovered. Theories… but not evidence As you can see, there is no shortage of theories… nothing more than a bundle of changing guesses! Isn’t there something wrong with a theory – any theory – if one needs to *invent* *unknown* and *never-seen* mechanisms to support it? Okay then. But what about fossils? Don’t we hear so often that they prove evolution? Ah, that’s a good question…

The Forbidden Secret
Part One – Evolution?
Chapter 4 – Mutations
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

Mutations, natural selection, and variations – MAKING EVOLUTION POSSIBLE?
Jack’s business was selling raincoats. He bought them for $69, then sold them for $62.50

“If I sell enough of them, I’ll be able to upgrade to a new car,” he said.

What was wrong with Jack’s plan? Of course you know! A business can’t make money by losing a little at a time.

And what has this to do with our subject? You’ll see…

The thought arises, perhaps DNA was created, but then after that evolution took over?

How? By mutations, dummy! Isn’t that what we were taught in school?

Mutations do not add information needed for evolution
Okay, stop right there. Mutations? What are they, anyway? If you didn’t know, mutations are genetic copying mistakes!

Mistakes? That’s right. Copying mistakes. Now, please help me here, if I’m missing something. Do you honestly think that mistakes would produce the intelligent organized information required for evolution?

You want it straight? There’s no need to guess. There is observational evidence. And it says no.

OBSERVED FACT ABOUT MUTATIONS: In every case known to science, there has been a loss of genetic information.

Wake up, Suzie! We now know that DNA molecules do not produce new genetic information. They only reproduce it.

Confirmed? Yes. As Dr Lee Spetner, a former biophysicist and professor, information theory specialist, at John Hopkins University, reveals:

All point mutations that have been studied on the molecular level turn out to reduce the genetic information and not to increase it. (Lee Spetner, Not by Chance. Brooklyn, NY.: The Judaica Press Inc., 1997, p. 138)

Information cannot be built up by mutations that lose it. A business can’t make money by losing a little at a time. (Ibid., p. 143. Emphasis added)

Well, who could argue with that?

Inherited back-up template can correct mutations
As I was mulling over this, there came the shocking news of a discovery made by plant scientists at Purdue University.

Well, what had the scientists discovered? It was a plant containing a template – that is, a master genetic blueprint – that can correct defective genes inherited from its parents.

What!

Yes, it’s true. They examined the offspring of two mutant plants which had a malfunctioning gene. And they found that 10 percent of their offspring don’t have this malformation but rather are like the normal (non-mutant) grandparents. As New York Times science reporter Nicholas Wade announced:

The discovery also raises interesting biological questions – including whether it gets in the way of evolution, which depends on mutations changing an organism rather than being put right by a backup system…. The finding poses a puzzle for evolutionary theory because it corrects mutations which evolution depends on as generators of novelty [new features]. (“Startling Scientists, Plant Fixes Its Flawed Genes,” New York Times, March 23, 2005)

Even Robert Pruitt, the discoverer of the phenomenon, was puzzled. As he admitted:

This challenges everything we believe…

It seems that these [mutant gene]-containing plants keep a cryptic copy of everything that was in the previous generation, even though it doesn’t show up in the DNA, it’s not in the chromosome. Some other type of gene sequence information that we don’t really understand yet is modifying the inherited traits. (Quoted by Susan Steeves, “Plants Defy Mendel’s Inheritance Laws, May Prompt Textbook Changes”, Purdue News Services)

Scientists do not yet know how many living organisms contain this master back-up copy. But the search has begun.

I can tell you this. One will be hard pressed to explain how such a mechanism could have been created in a Darwinian step-by-step fashion – and inherited not from parents, but from grandparents or distant ancestors!

We noted earlier that there is a complex mechanism within the DNA of every cell that corrects mutations. Remember the flies that lost eyes and got them back again after several generations?

Mutation only within the species
And, in any case, when a mutation occurs, the change is still within the DNA of the species. The change is within the basic type of organism, not transferred from one basic type into another.

If half developed: no survival value
You know as well as I. Of the many thousands of living things, every one is today perfectly designed for its environment. There is a happy state of dependability and workability throughout nature. And it is persistently so.

Does anyone want to quibble over that? So, do you mind me asking, if evolution is occurring now, where is it? I’ve looked high and low. There should be thousands of partly evolved features. There are none! Not one life form has a half developed organ, or an organ superfluous to its needs. Nothing is unfitted, or out of place.

Instead, what do we see? Thousands of amazing creatures doing highly specialized jobs that demonstrate intelligence – which they don’t have. Not only that, they also possess highly specialized organs which are vital to their survival – organs which could not possibly be the outcome of long and gradual ‘chance mutations’.

Common sense tells us that these millions of ‘specialized organs’ are so highly complex that to be useful and functional, every one of their interlocking parts had to all come into existence at once.

You don’t need to be smart to realize that numerous precision components had to work perfectly from the very start of any organism’s existence. No process of gradual change from generation to generation could ever create any apparatus with all its inter-dependent working parts.

Not until the entire mechanism was complete would the arrangement have any practical value to an animal or plant. Meanwhile, mutations which led to the useless intermediate stages, having no survival value, would be removed by the so-called “natural selection” process. And the final, complete mechanism would never have been able to appear.

We’ve already referred to the term “irreducible complexity” – which means that systems needed to appear in an organism already complete if they were to function at all.

When you think about it, there’s nothing really simple. Even the simple mousetrap is a combination of several different things – a block of wood, the spring latch and the hammer. If one is missing, the mousetrap is useless.

Evolution theory would require that each element of the mousetrap developed on its own, separately. But how could that make sense? Because the trap wouldn’t work without all three parts there at the start.

Have you ever studied the human eye? It’s not simple like that mousetrap. The eye is made up of millions of parts – the pupil, lens, muscles, optic nerve, and millions of rods and cones. All parts were needed at once. So how did that come about? Could evolution answer this? Yeah. And pigs will fly.

To design something like an eye you’d need a clever-minded engineer.

Again, Michael Behe, a biochemist at Pennsylvania’s Lehigh University, explained that information is primarily an instruction manual:

Consider a step-by-step list of [genetic] instructions. A mutation is a change in one of the lines of instructions. So instead of saying, ‘Take a ¼ inch nut,’ a mutation might say, ‘Take a 3/8 inch nut.’ Or instead of ‘Place the round peg in the round hole,’ we might get ‘Place the round peg in the square hole’… What a mutation cannot do is change all the instructions in one step – say, [providing instructions] to build a fax machine instead of a radio. (Michael Behe, Darwin’s Black Box, 1996, p. 41)

What about “punctuated equilibrium”?
The theory goes like this. Perhaps the major evolutionary changes occurred quite rapidly, while the population levels were low. So, the gaps might be due to such periods of ‘explosive evolution’, which occurred so rapidly they left no trace in the fossils.

In other words, extremely fast evolution occurred in small, isolated communities. So, it was NOT recorded in the fossil strata.

In that case, evidence should not even be expected. Um, okay.

Great theory. But evidence? Can’t find a shred of physical evidence for it. Frankly, it’s an argument from silence. You just have to trust it by faith.

You are probably going to tell me that a theory which predicts it will have no evidence hardly qualifies as a scientific theory. And I must agree with you.

Punctuated equilibrium doesn’t even have a mechanism. Even the promoters themselves admit that.

You mean experiments have not been able to show any means by which evolutionary jumps can occur? Not one.

So, it’s not scientific observation. We’re asked to believe that evolution occurs so slowly today that we cannot detect it, and so rapidly in the past that we cannot detect it!

Then I came upon a copy of Science News. The report mentioned how the AIDS virus was shown to mutate up to a million times faster than the DNA for other organisms. So, in one year the virus went through the equivalent of 1 million years of mutation at the usual rate. (Science News, June 28, 1986, p. 410)

Great! Here’s a good way to test the “punctuated equilibrium” theory. Here’s an example of what would actually happen if very fast development did occur in a small, isolated community, as some have suggested.

Hopefully this helps the theory? Oh, bother! Even with the mutation process speeded up a million times, the AIDS virus only ‘evolved’ into another form of AIDS virus and nothing else. (Ibid.)

Now you know. This observed evidence actually refutes the idea of punctuated equilibrium.

Darn it! Fossil evidence shows the same for other creatures that experience numerous mutations in a short period. The first spiders mutated and selected into the forms they have today. They remain spiders. And the same with everything else.

Here is no joy for “punctuated equilibrium” as a means of evolution. Punctuated equilibrium? That’s the kind of evolution you have when you don’t actually have any evolution!

Does that leave you with a kind of empty feeling inside?

My final question on punctuated equilibrium is this: Just how could these big jumps occur genetically? How could the genetic code for fully functioning organs suddenly appear out of nowhere?

What about natural selection?
We all know that variation exists among living forms. Variations are the result of what we call natural selection. What is natural selection? It is the process by which heritable traits are selected from the parent gene pool, that make it more likely for an organism to survive in a particular circumstance.

There’s an oft-recited myth that natural selection is “the mechanism by which evolution occurs.”

Why a myth? Because of…INFORMATION. Since information cannot be added, then at the very start, the parents must have possessed enough variety of information so their descendants could select what was needed to help them adapt to a wide variety of environments. For example, antibiotic resistance, or long beaks may become dominant features in generations that follow. But, bad luck… the gene pool has been reduced.

Why? Because it is a selecting of only some of the parents’ gene pool. Thus, the original information is thereby reduced, and that is the opposite of evolution.

But let facts get in the way? Never. This evolution theory has become an institution. (And some say that’s where it belongs.)

Variations = evolution? No!
In every case, the descendants, despite all their variations, continue to be of the same basic type. The DNA ensures that. All today’s dog breeds came from an original dog. And that original dog possessed all of the genetic information required to produce the varieties of dogs we now see. But all its descendants, no matter what their appearance, are still – every one of them – dogs. No amount of variation will mutate a dog into a horse, or anything else.

So, is variation evolution? Another disappointment. It’s not evolution, but adaptation.

What about when some varieties become extinct and others survive? Sorry, extinction is not evolution. The bottom line is that the information has been reduced. The gene pool has been reduced. And that is the opposite of evolution.

Total re-design needed
For one creature to change into the other (for example, a reptile into a winged bird) is not a modification, it is a cancelling of one perfect design and starting with another. And if only part of the new design system is complete, then the total organism will fail to function. In that single lifetime it would become extinct. Inter-dependence of every part – we cannot shrug this away.

Do similarities prove evolution?
But what about similar design of body parts shared by different creatures? Isn’t this a hint of a common evolutionary ancestor?

As an intelligent person, just think it through. Again, the answer is: OF COURSE NOT! Common sense tells us that similar parts more likely had a common designer. And an efficient design will be used constantly. If a wheel is useful for a motor car, a wheel will also be useful for a skateboard, or a bicycle. The skateboard did not beget the car.

Quick summary
DON’T VARIATIONS PROVE EVOLUTION? No. Whether mutations or natural selection, they only reduce the information to each new variety. They do not add information for upward evolution to occur.

DON’T SIMILARITIES PROVE EVOLUTION? No. Parts similarity only indicates an efficient design – and very likely a common designer.

In any case, for evolution to happen, you need two essentials:
1. a CODE to direct evolution, and
2. an ENABLING MECHANISM.

But neither of these has been discovered.

Theories… but not evidence
As you can see, there is no shortage of theories… nothing more than a bundle of changing guesses! Isn’t there something wrong with a theory – any theory – if one needs to invent unknown and never-seen mechanisms to support it?

Okay then. But what about fossils? Don’t we hear so often that they prove evolution?

Ah, that’s a good question…

The Forbidden Secret Part One – Evolution? Chapter 5 – Fossils (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
*Fossils* *and* *evolution* – DEAD IN THE WRONG PLACE Do you remember sitting in school and being taught about “the geological column”? The chart went something like this: The story goes that after the first simple cell, more complex life forms evolved… amoeba… trilobites… coal 280 million years ago… dinosaurs 135- to 65 million years ago … and man more recently, say 5- to 1 million years ago. There you are. Evolution did occur. And that’s the sequence. Just believe the chart! The world’s best known living atheist, Richard Dawkins recently said, “I challenge anyone to submit ‘out-of-sequence’ fossil finds that disprove evolution.” And his buddy Warwick Don added, “Evolution would be falsified if even one out of sequence fossil were ever found in the fossil record, e.g. a fossil ‘human’ in the Carboniferous [coal]… No such anachronistic fossils have ever been found.” (Investigate magazine, January 2010) So, evolution theory is secure. Fold your arms, lie back and all is well. Oh bother! Who’s this spoil sport rocking the boat? Oh, some unimportant guy by the name of Ed Conrad. What has he done? Near Mahanoy City, between coal veins in the anthracite region of Pennsylvania, he has discovered a fossil human skull and other human parts, as well. That’s right, in coal-bearing strata. Have they been scientifically examined? Indeed, they have. Bones, teeth and/or soft organs found in this Carboniferous strata have been subjected to independent scans and tests at * American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Virginia, considered the world’s foremost medical lab. * Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center at University in Atlanta, Georgia, considered the foremost facility for primate research. * National Taiwan University geology department. * Alberta Research Council in Canada. From more than 20 fossils thin sectioned and examined and more than 1,000 microscopic pictures taken, the verdict, proven beyond doubt, is that humans were entombed in Carboniferous strata! They were buried the same time as the trees that formed the coal. So, as *our* *evolutionist* *friends* *Dawkins* *and* *Don* *themselves* *tell* *us,* such a discovery *falsifies* *evolution. (Please read my 58 page scientific report – http://www.beforeus.com/man-in-carboniferous.pdf) Controversial? You bet! So we must rubbish these finds every way.possible. (Never mind the certified test results.) Portion* of the human skull from Carboniferous strata Okay, I’m feeling in a generous mood. So let’s scrap Conrad’s discoveries. Will that help us? Um… er… it sort of gets worse… In all geological strata types The chart illustrates the problem. Not only have numerous other human remains been discovered in Carboniferous strata – including complete skeletons (Macoupin County, Illinois – The Geologist). But they’re also in EVERY other so-called geological “age”, as well. Those listed are a mere sampling of finds – commonly reburied, “lost” in museum basements, or suppressed. That’s why you seldom hear of them. In 1912, at the Municipal Electric Plant, at Thomas, Oklahoma, fireman Frank J. Kenword split a large piece of coal and discovered an *iron* *pot* embedded inside. The source of the coal was the Wilburton, Oklahoma, Mines. The pot is on display at the Miles Musical Museum in Eureka Springs. At Meeting House Hill, Dorchester, Massachussetts in 1851, a *metallic* *vase* was blown out of an immense mass of solid rock. The rock was said to be *Precambrian, “over 600 million years old.” (That’s worse than being found in Carboniferous!) Made of an unknown metal, the artefact was beautifully inlaid with pure silver. It portrayed six figures of a flower, a bouquet, and a vine or wreath. The chasing, carving and inlaying are cleverly and exquisitely done. (Scientific* American, Vol.7, p.298, June 5, 1852) Summarising the fossils It is not just physical finds such as these that scream out against evolution. Here are summarised for you eight major fossil facts that, quite frankly, are alarming. Complex fossils appear suddenly in the “earliest” strata, *already* *fully* *formed,* with no *evidence* of *ancestors.* Each plant and animal type appears abruptly in the *subsequent* fossil record, with no *evidence* of *any* *previous* *transitional* *form* *leading* up to *it.* At its first appearance it is an *already* *complete, functional unit – and optimal from an engineering standpoint. Thus there are persistent, unbridgeable* *gaps* or chasms *between* different major types of organisms. – between, for example, reptiles and birds. The same gaps between organisms that we witness today, are likewise in the fossil record of the past. No links. Fossils in the “wrong” order. All over the world, what the evolution theory classifies as “older” and “younger” are found mixed in *any* *sequence* – no evolutionary progression. Although, theoretically, millions of years of deposits make up the different strata, in the real physical world of remains there is no *visible* *time* *lapse* between them. Polystrate fossils: All over the world, *individual* *fossils* *penetrate* *several* *strata. For example, in the picture below you see Jeff Smith, long time industrial chemist, standing beside a fossil pine tree in the Pilot coal seams south of Newcastle, Australia. Its trunk penetrates vertically through fourteen* different coal seams, each of which was, according to evolution theory, formed slowly over thousands or millions of years. But, horror of horrors, here is one tree going through all of them. The coal seams are interspersed with layers of sand. How on earth could any tree trunk survive the ups and downs while waiting to get buried? But the *evidence* is that that tree had no time to decay before it was buried. Such polystrate fossils are common, all over the world. Strata was *formed* *rapidly. There is not* *one* *geological* *site* on earth that has the full evolution fossil sequence palmed off to us in textbooks. Not anywhere! It’s in their heads, not in the rocks. “Index fossils” (fossils assumed to have lived exclusively in a particular era and which were thus used to date rock layers in which they appeared) are now found still alive. These *living* *fossils* falsify the “indexed” age of the rocks. Today’s living organisms are basically *unchanged* *from* *their* *first* *fossil* *ancestors. Just look at the flatworm. With its short lifespan we can watch it go through* *thousands* of *generations,* which, according to evolution theory, should be enough to show evidence of evolution. But not so! It is necessary to keep the information concerning these eight fossil facts brief here, but for in-depth *evidence, may I recommend Surprise* Witness, chapters 14 – 17 (<http//.www.beforeus. com/second.php>) and The Discovery That’s Toppling Evolution, chs. 3 – 9 (<http://www. beforeus.com/evol.php>) No transitional remains found To comment briefly on Point 2, have you ever gone through a museum and noticed how with no real links between life-forms, someone had tried to “fill in the gaps” with artists’ sketches? The evolutionist’s sketches normally portray an ape-like creature that turns into a man – a theory arrived at presumably after extensive self-examination. Of course, like the frog-into-a-prince tale, you can draw a picture of anything. This lack you can correctly view as an enormous problem. A true transitional link would be something with a non-functional “partial” something – like a partially formed feather. However, among the millions of fossils found, one finds evidence of *only* *totally* *functional* *components* – all from the very start, fully perfect. The “prehistoric man” myth Evolutionists segment history into ages – such as the “Stone Age” for “prehistoric” times. Yet this is useless for determining a chronological history because, as they admit, these ages may not be sequential, but actually contemporary! Today, while we live in our age of space exploration, the Internet, and nuclear power, we have other people living in a primitive “stone age” culture in tropical rainforests. It was almost always so. Man started off intelligent. After natural or man-made disasters, survivors had to get by with more primitive tools of survival – yet preserving the memory of their ancestors past achievements. Indeed, you might well ask, Was there ever a Stone Age? The answer is NO! Have there been *stone* *cultures? Yes. (Please study the evidence in my book Dead* Men’s Secrets, Chapters 5 to 7.) More complex first Regarding Point 3, evolution theory says that simpler organisms evolved first, followed by more complex. Logic tells us that plants would need to come first, so that animals could feed on them. But did you know that plant cells are more complicated than animals’ cells? Each plant cell has 20 to 100 sub-units, called chloroplasts. And each chloroplast contains about 45 sun traps. These sun traps are like solar panels on the roof of a house, to: receive and convert the sun’s rays to energy absorb carbon dioxide, and then give out oxygen into the air for animal life to breath. Every solar panel in a plant contains a green pigment called chlorophyll. This greenness soaks in the sun’s energy. Now, here is the crunch. Evolution theory says the simpler systems came first and the more complex systems came later. But this chloroplast discovery means that, contrary to evolution theory, *the* *more* *complex* *systems* *came* *first.* Animal cells do not have these complicated sun-converting panels. Yet, without these, animal life could not have started or survived. Darwin: “Fossils will prove or disprove my theory” Darwin predicted that the evidence for evolution would eventually be found in the fossils buried in the earth’s strata. (Darwin, Charles. “On the imperfection of the geological record,” Chapter X, The Origin of Species London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1971, pp.292-293) And Darwin’s champion, T.A. Huxley, had said, “If evolution has taken place, there will its marks be found; if it has not taken place, there will be its refutation.” So, what has since been found? The sad fact was admitted by Niles Eldridge, curator of New York’s Natural History Museum: “The fossil record we were told to find in the past 120 years [since Darwin] *does* *not* *exist.” (New* York Times, November 4, 1980). And some 30 years after that, nothing has changed. When anyone tells us the fossils prove evolution, we are being lied to, because the hoped for evidence for evolution in the fossil record does not exist. (For a great deal of scientific documentation, see my two books Surprise Witness, chs. 14 – 17 <http//.www.beforeus.com/second.php> ; The Discovery That’s Toppling Evolution, chs. 3 – 9 http://www.beforeus.com/evol.html>) Yet, even as the theory crumbles, its promoters cling on with religious tenacity. Why do they keep flogging a dead horse? More honest evolutionists like Dr. Michael Walker, Senior Lecturer in Anthropology, Sydney University, have put their finger on it. He stated: One is forced to conclude that many scientists and technologists pay lip-service to Darwinian theory only because it supposedly excludes a Creator. (Michael Walker, Sydney University Quadrant, October, 1981, p.44) Yes, many accept evolution theory not from a careful evaluation of the data, but because of a bias against the supernatural. The real reason why these people want to believe in evolution is to *get* *God* *out* of *their* *lives. If you admit evolution is false, then you have to deal with God. The theory of evolution is there to eliminate God out of peoples’ lives. Darwinism has become something close to a religion or a worldview. The* cover up Then how are scientists in general reacting to such recent discoveries? Combing through the literature, one finds that these facts have came as a surprise to most scientists – because evolution was all they were taught. Others know about the latest discoveries but are playing dumb – fearful of bucking the establishment! Scoundrels – all of them! Sure, many mean well. But they still hide the facts. Reputations, careers, and financial research grants are at risk. And so this shabby pseudoscience has acquired a blind popularity. Thousands of scientists abandoning evolution But truth can’t be suppressed forever. Meanwhile, many highly qualified scientists are openly rejecting evolution. In the United States alone, tens of thousands of them. One of the most renowned atheists of the 20th century was Dr Antony Flew of the University of Reading, in England. Flew is arguably the best-known atheist in the academic world of the last 50 years. He helped set the agenda for atheism with his paper “Theology and Falsification”. That was the most widely reprinted philosophical publication of the last half century. Well, in 2004 Dr Flew startled the scholarly world by announcing he had now accepted the existence of God, largely due to his study of DNA. Here are his own words: “I think that the most impressive arguments for God’s existence are those that are supported by recent scientific discoveries … I think the argument to Intelligent Design is enormously stronger than it was when I first met it.” (Richard Ostling, ” Leading Atheist Now Believes in God,” Associated Press report, Dec. 9, 2004). He then stated: “As people have certainly been influenced by me, I want to try and correct the enormous damage I may have done.” (Stuart Wavell and Will Iredale, “Sorry, Says Atheist-in-Chief, I Do Believe in God After All,” Dec. 12, 2004). There’s an honest man. Majority of medical doctors In a survey of 1,482 physicians (the type of people most familiar with the wonders of the human body), the majority rejected strict Darwinism. The poll was conducted by HCD Research and the Louis Finkelstein Institute for Religious and Social Studies. “Of course, most doctors are skeptical of Darwinism,” said Dr Robert Cihak, M.D., former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and a medical columnist for JewishWorldReview.com. “An eye surgeon knows the astonishing intricacies of human vision intimately, so the vague, just-so stories about eye evolution don’t fool him. And the eye is just one of the countless organs and interdependent systems in the body that defy Darwinian explanation.” (Discovery Institute, “Nearly Two-Thirds of Doctors Skeptical of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution,” May 31, 2005) Unscientific The evolution theory contradicts these known scientific laws: 1. FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS: Energy or mass are neither created nor destroyed. Energy and mass cannot originate from nothing, by natural processes. The universe could not have begun itself. EVOLUTION SAYS matter and energy created itself from nothing. 2. BIOGENESIS: Life comes ONLY from life. This tells us that life cannot and never did originate by natural processes. EVOLUTION SAYS life originated from non-life. 3. SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS: With time, a closed system (like our universe) will become more random and disordered. Things wear out and break down. Ask any engineer or homeowner. EVOLUTION SAYS the universe began as disorder (the big bang) and became orderly over time. 4. CAUSE AND EFFECT: An observed event can be traced to an event that preceded it. EVOLUTION believes in NO ‘First Cause’ for the universe. 12 questions that demand an answer: What scientific laws support the theory of evolution? How did life originate? 3. How did energy originate? 4. How did mass originate? 5. How did DNA information code originate? 6. How did the code to translate it originate? 7. MAN SINCE START OF LIFE?: If man evolved from earlier forms, then why are *human* *remains* found in *all* *“ages”* of strata, even with the “first and earliest” fossil life forms? 8. COMPLEX LIFE AT START?: Why do *complex* *fossils* appear in the “earliest” strata, with no *evidence* of *ancestors? 9. REQUIRED LINKS NOT FOUND: Why are there persistent* *gaps* *between* major types of organisms – with no evidence of transition from one type to another? 10. STRATA RAPIDLY FORMED?: Why does a single fossil commonly *penetrate* *through* *multiple* *“ages”* of strata? 11. UNCHANGED OVER THE AGES: Why are today’s basic types *unchanged* from their first fossil ancestors? 12. EVOLVING OF INFORMATION: How does new *information* evolve? It seems to me that fossils and DNA kill evolution stone dead. (a) DNA tells me evolution *couldn’t* *even* *get* *started.* (b) Fossils tell me that whatever we started with *has* *not evolved* *since* *then. * * * * * * For more detailed information, see The Discovery That’s Toppling Evolution, 218 pages

The Forbidden Secret
Part One – Evolution?
Chapter 5 – Fossils
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

Fossils and evolution – DEAD IN THE WRONG PLACE

Do you remember sitting in school and being taught about “the geological column”? The chart went something like this:

The story goes that after the first simple cell, more complex life forms evolved… amoeba… trilobites… coal 280 million years ago… dinosaurs 135- to 65 million years ago … and man more recently, say 5- to 1 million years ago.

There you are. Evolution did occur. And that’s the sequence. Just believe the chart!

The world’s best known living atheist, Richard Dawkins recently said, “I challenge anyone to submit ‘out-of-sequence’ fossil finds that disprove evolution.”

And his buddy Warwick Don added, “Evolution would be falsified if even one out of sequence fossil were ever found in the fossil record, e.g. a fossil ‘human’ in the Carboniferous [coal]… No such anachronistic fossils have ever been found.” (Investigate magazine, January 2010)

So, evolution theory is secure. Fold your arms, lie back and all is well.

Oh bother! Who’s this spoil sport rocking the boat? Oh, some unimportant guy by the name of Ed Conrad.

What has he done?

Near Mahanoy City, between coal veins in the anthracite region of Pennsylvania, he has discovered a fossil human skull and other human parts, as well. That’s right, in coal-bearing strata.

Have they been scientifically examined? Indeed, they have. Bones, teeth and/or soft organs found in this Carboniferous strata have been subjected to independent scans and tests at

* American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Virginia, considered the world’s foremost medical lab.

* Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center at University in Atlanta, Georgia, considered the foremost facility for primate research.

* National Taiwan University geology department.

* Alberta Research Council in Canada.

From more than 20 fossils thin sectioned and examined and more than 1,000 microscopic pictures taken, the verdict, proven beyond doubt, is that humans were entombed in Carboniferous strata! They were buried the same time as the trees that formed the coal.

So, as our evolutionist friends Dawkins and Don themselves tell us, such a discovery falsifies evolution. (Please read my 58 page scientific report – http://www.beforeus.com/man-in-carboniferous.pdf)

Controversial? You bet! So we must rubbish these finds every way.possible. (Never mind the certified test results.)

Portion of the human skull from Carboniferous strata

Okay, I’m feeling in a generous mood. So let’s scrap Conrad’s discoveries. Will that help us? Um… er… it sort of gets worse…

In all geological strata types

The chart illustrates the problem. Not only have numerous other human remains been discovered in Carboniferous strata – including complete skeletons (Macoupin County, Illinois – The Geologist). But they’re also in EVERY other so-called geological “age”, as well. Those listed are a mere sampling of finds – commonly reburied, “lost” in museum basements, or suppressed. That’s why you seldom hear of them.

In 1912, at the Municipal Electric Plant, at Thomas, Oklahoma, fireman Frank J. Kenword split a large piece of coal and discovered an iron pot embedded inside. The source of the coal was the Wilburton, Oklahoma, Mines. The pot is on display at the Miles Musical Museum in Eureka Springs.

At Meeting House Hill, Dorchester, Massachussetts in 1851, a metallic vase was blown out of an immense mass of solid rock. The rock was said to be Precambrian, “over 600 million years old.” (That’s worse than being found in Carboniferous!) Made of an unknown metal, the artefact was beautifully inlaid with pure silver. It portrayed six figures of a flower, a bouquet, and a vine or wreath. The chasing, carving and inlaying are cleverly and exquisitely done. (Scientific American, Vol.7, p.298, June 5, 1852)

Summarising the fossils
It is not just physical finds such as these that scream out against evolution. Here are summarised for you eight major fossil facts that, quite frankly, are alarming.

Complex fossils appear suddenly in the “earliest” strata, already fully formed, with no evidence of ancestors.

Each plant and animal type appears abruptly in the subsequent fossil record, with no evidence of any previous transitional form leading up to it. At its first appearance it is an already complete, functional unit – and optimal from an engineering standpoint. Thus there are persistent, unbridgeable gaps or chasms between different major types of organisms. – between, for example, reptiles and birds. The same gaps between organisms that we witness today, are likewise in the fossil record of the past. No links.

Fossils in the “wrong” order. All over the world, what the evolution theory classifies as “older” and “younger” are found mixed in any sequence – no evolutionary progression.

Although, theoretically, millions of years of deposits make up the different strata, in the real physical world of remains there is no visible time lapse between them.

Polystrate fossils: All over the world, individual fossils penetrate several strata. For example, in the picture below you see Jeff Smith, long time industrial chemist, standing beside a fossil pine tree in the Pilot coal seams south of Newcastle, Australia. Its trunk penetrates vertically through fourteen different coal seams, each of which was, according to evolution theory, formed slowly over thousands or millions of years. But, horror of horrors, here is one tree going through all of them. The coal seams are interspersed with layers of sand. How on earth could any tree trunk survive the ups and downs while waiting to get buried? But the evidence is that that tree had no time to decay before it was buried. Such polystrate fossils are common, all over the world. Strata was formed rapidly.

There is not one geological site on earth that has the full evolution fossil sequence palmed off to us in textbooks. Not anywhere! It’s in their heads, not in the rocks.

“Index fossils” (fossils assumed to have lived exclusively in a particular era and which were thus used to date rock layers in which they appeared) are now found still alive. These living fossils falsify the “indexed” age of the rocks.

Today’s living organisms are basically unchanged from their first fossil ancestors. Just look at the flatworm. With its short lifespan we can watch it go through thousands of generations, which, according to evolution theory, should be enough to show evidence of evolution. But not so!

It is necessary to keep the information concerning these eight fossil facts brief here, but for in-depth evidence, may I recommend Surprise Witness, chapters 14 – 17 (<http//.www.beforeus. com/second.php>) and The Discovery That’s Toppling Evolution, chs. 3 – 9 (<http://www. beforeus.com/evol.php>)

No transitional remains found
To comment briefly on Point 2, have you ever gone through a museum and noticed how with no real links between life-forms, someone had tried to “fill in the gaps” with artists’ sketches?

The evolutionist’s sketches normally portray an ape-like creature that turns into a man – a theory arrived at presumably after extensive self-examination. Of course, like the frog-into-a-prince tale, you can draw a picture of anything.

This lack you can correctly view as an enormous problem. A true transitional link would be something with a non-functional “partial” something – like a partially formed feather. However, among the millions of fossils found, one finds evidence of only totally functional components – all from the very start, fully perfect.

The “prehistoric man” myth
Evolutionists segment history into ages – such as the “Stone Age” for “prehistoric” times. Yet this is useless for determining a chronological history because, as they admit, these ages may not be sequential, but actually contemporary! Today, while we live in our age of space exploration, the Internet, and nuclear power, we have other people living in a primitive “stone age” culture in tropical rainforests. It was almost always so. Man started off intelligent. After natural or man-made disasters, survivors had to get by with more primitive tools of survival – yet preserving the memory of their ancestors past achievements. Indeed, you might well ask, Was there ever a Stone Age? The answer is NO! Have there been stone cultures? Yes. (Please study the evidence in my book Dead Men’s Secrets, Chapters 5 to 7.)

More complex first
Regarding Point 3, evolution theory says that simpler organisms evolved first, followed by more complex. Logic tells us that plants would need to come first, so that animals could feed on them.

But did you know that plant cells are more complicated than animals’ cells? Each plant cell has 20 to 100 sub-units, called chloroplasts. And each chloroplast contains about 45 sun traps. These sun traps are like solar panels on the roof of a house, to:

receive and convert the sun’s rays to energy

absorb carbon dioxide, and then

give out oxygen into the air for animal life to breath.

Every solar panel in a plant contains a green pigment called chlorophyll. This greenness soaks in the sun’s energy.

Now, here is the crunch. Evolution theory says the simpler systems came first and the more complex systems came later.

But this chloroplast discovery means that, contrary to evolution theory, the more complex systems came first.

Animal cells do not have these complicated sun-converting panels. Yet, without these, animal life could not have started or survived.

Darwin: “Fossils will prove or disprove my theory”
Darwin predicted that the evidence for evolution would eventually be found in the fossils buried in the earth’s strata. (Darwin, Charles. “On the imperfection of the geological record,” Chapter X, The Origin of Species London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., 1971, pp.292-293)

And Darwin’s champion, T.A. Huxley, had said, “If evolution has taken place, there will its marks be found; if it has not taken place, there will be its refutation.”

So, what has since been found? The sad fact was admitted by Niles Eldridge, curator of New York’s Natural History Museum: “The fossil record we were told to find in the past 120 years [since Darwin] does not exist.” (New York Times, November 4, 1980).

And some 30 years after that, nothing has changed.

When anyone tells us the fossils prove evolution, we are being lied to, because the hoped for evidence for evolution in the fossil record does not exist. (For a great deal of scientific documentation, see my two books Surprise Witness, chs. 14 – 17 <http//.www.beforeus.com/second.php> ; The Discovery That’s Toppling Evolution, chs. 3 – 9 http://www.beforeus.com/evol.html>)

Yet, even as the theory crumbles, its promoters cling on with religious tenacity. Why do they keep flogging a dead horse? More honest evolutionists like Dr. Michael Walker, Senior Lecturer in Anthropology, Sydney University, have put their finger on it. He stated:

One is forced to conclude that many scientists and technologists pay lip-service to Darwinian theory only because it supposedly excludes a Creator. (Michael Walker, Sydney University Quadrant, October, 1981, p.44)

Yes, many accept evolution theory not from a careful evaluation of the data, but because of a bias against the supernatural. The real reason why these people want to believe in evolution is to get God out of their lives. If you admit evolution is false, then you have to deal with God. The theory of evolution is there to eliminate God out of peoples’ lives. Darwinism has become something close to a religion or a worldview.

The cover up
Then how are scientists in general reacting to such recent discoveries? Combing through the literature, one finds that these facts have came as a surprise to most scientists – because evolution was all they were taught.

Others know about the latest discoveries but are playing dumb – fearful of bucking the establishment! Scoundrels – all of them! Sure, many mean well. But they still hide the facts. Reputations, careers, and financial research grants are at risk. And so this shabby pseudoscience has acquired a blind popularity.

Thousands of scientists abandoning evolution
But truth can’t be suppressed forever. Meanwhile, many highly qualified scientists are openly rejecting evolution. In the United States alone, tens of thousands of them.

One of the most renowned atheists of the 20th century was Dr Antony Flew of the University of Reading, in England. Flew is arguably the best-known atheist in the academic world of the last 50 years. He helped set the agenda for atheism with his paper “Theology and Falsification”. That was the most widely reprinted philosophical publication of the last half century.

Well, in 2004 Dr Flew startled the scholarly world by announcing he had now accepted the existence of God, largely due to his study of DNA. Here are his own words: “I think that the most impressive arguments for God’s existence are those that are supported by recent scientific discoveries … I think the argument to Intelligent Design is enormously stronger than it was when I first met it.” (Richard Ostling, ” Leading Atheist Now Believes in God,” Associated Press report, Dec. 9, 2004).

He then stated: “As people have certainly been influenced by me, I want to try and correct the enormous damage I may have done.” (Stuart Wavell and Will Iredale, “Sorry, Says Atheist-in-Chief, I Do Believe in God After All,” Dec. 12, 2004). There’s an honest man.

Majority of medical doctors
In a survey of 1,482 physicians (the type of people most familiar with the wonders of the human body), the majority rejected strict Darwinism. The poll was conducted by HCD Research and the Louis Finkelstein Institute for Religious and Social Studies.

“Of course, most doctors are skeptical of Darwinism,” said Dr Robert Cihak, M.D., former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and a medical columnist for JewishWorldReview.com. “An eye surgeon knows the astonishing intricacies of human vision intimately, so the vague, just-so stories about eye evolution don’t fool him. And the eye is just one of the countless organs and interdependent systems in the body that defy Darwinian explanation.” (Discovery Institute, “Nearly Two-Thirds of Doctors Skeptical of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution,” May 31, 2005)

Unscientific
The evolution theory contradicts these known scientific laws:

1. FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS: Energy or mass are neither created nor destroyed. Energy and mass cannot originate from nothing, by natural processes. The universe could not have begun itself. EVOLUTION SAYS matter and energy created itself from nothing.

2. BIOGENESIS: Life comes ONLY from life. This tells us that life cannot and never did originate by natural processes. EVOLUTION SAYS life originated from non-life.

3. SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS: With time, a closed system (like our universe) will become more random and disordered. Things wear out and break down. Ask any engineer or homeowner. EVOLUTION SAYS the universe began as disorder (the big bang) and became orderly over time.

4. CAUSE AND EFFECT: An observed event can be traced to an event that preceded it. EVOLUTION believes in NO ‘First Cause’ for the universe.

12 questions that demand an answer:
What scientific laws support the theory of evolution?

How did life originate?

3. How did energy originate?

4. How did mass originate?

5. How did DNA information code originate?

6. How did the code to translate it originate?

7. MAN SINCE START OF LIFE?: If man evolved from earlier forms, then why are human remains found in all “ages” of strata, even with the “first and earliest” fossil life forms?

8. COMPLEX LIFE AT START?: Why do complex fossils appear in the “earliest” strata, with no evidence of ancestors?

9. REQUIRED LINKS NOT FOUND: Why are there persistent gaps between major types of organisms – with no evidence of transition from one type to another?

10. STRATA RAPIDLY FORMED?: Why does a single fossil commonly penetrate through multiple “ages” of strata?

11. UNCHANGED OVER THE AGES: Why are today’s basic types unchanged from their first fossil ancestors?

12. EVOLVING OF INFORMATION: How does new information evolve?

It seems to me that fossils and DNA kill evolution stone dead.

(a) DNA tells me evolution couldn’t even get started.

(b) Fossils tell me that whatever we started with has not evolved since then.

* * * * * * *
For more detailed information, see
The Discovery That’s Toppling Evolution, 218 pages

The Forbidden Secret Part Two – Aliens? Chapter 6 – Sumerian Tablets (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
*From* *outer* *space?* – THE SUMERIAN TABLETS SHOCK Erich von Danicken caused a sensation in the seventies when he claimed that sophisticated ancient relics were the result of a space visit to earth. Now is the time for the truth. Von Danicken, like others, assumed that early man struggled for endless millions of years as a primitive dumb and stupid creature, unable to accomplish anything on his own. Then we find man quite suddenly (in the last few thousand years) nurturing a technology so intricate, so sophisticated, that it suggests intellectual maturity from the start. You don’t have to be smart to sense there is something wrong here. So, faced with the new evidence of high technology in ancient times, and realizing that man could not have obtained such advanced thinking capabilities and complex technology simply by evolving from nothing, Von Danicken’s camp suggested that maybe galactic visitors were responsible. These alien giants crossbred with primates to produce modern man, then left behind artefacts from their visit. Did they? You have to admit, it’s an interesting theory. The Planet X – Anunnaki shock And then there’s the Planet X story. It’s the kind of story you might want to believe. A certain popular writer, describing himself as an expert on ancient texts, tells us that beyond the planet Pluto there is an outer planet called Nibiru. Nibiru was populated by a reptilian super race, the Annunaki. The Anunnakis’ own planet was dying. So the Anunnaki came to Planet Earth to attempt a rescue of their planet. The gold on Planet Earth was needed to create a shield for preserving Nibiru’s dwindling atmosphere. One can actually feel sorry for the Anunnaki. Anyway, this Planet Nibiru, in its orbit, came close to Planet Earth. A group of 50 astronauts from Nibiru, with their leader called Enki, splashed down in the waters of the Persian Gulf. Some Anunnaki were sent to mine gold in Africa. When the toil became unbearable, Enki ‘created’ ‘primitive workers’ by mixing the genes of male Anunnaki with the eggs of early female hominoids, to bring about Homo sapiens – you and me. This sudden speed-up given to our evolution explains how the Sumerian civilization began suddenly, fully developed, with no evidence of a primitive beginning. You can credit these extraterrestrials for jump-starting it, this popular writer says. Oh, and something else. The orbit of Nibiru (which some label Planet X) brings it into our solar system every 3,600 years. It will return to Planet Earth very soon. Well, that awakens my interest. How about you? Mr S: “It’s on the Sumerian tablets” In any case, this gentleman, whom we shall call Mr S, assures us that this is what the Sumerian clay tablets say. In fact, he has been heavily promoting this topic. In contrast to the airy speculation of von Danicken, Mr S claims to be a scholar. He graduated in economics. But he claims to be an expert in ancient Sumerian texts and Hebrew. You have to admit, an argument appealing to ancient clay tablets does sound somewhat scholarly. Oh well, you must have guessed by now who Mr S is, so I might as well name him. But I shall make it absolutely clear that what follows is not about the man. It’s about the subject. I have no problem with Zecharia Sitchin as a person. He’s probably quite a nice guy. (Later note: Sitchin died soon after I wrote this report.) As it was, for a number of years I accepted this gentleman’s claim that the above story was in those ancient Sumerian records. After all, you just don’t make up such things, do you? When Mr S first spun his exciting story to us, how many of us had access to all the Sumerian texts? What he had right From my years of independent research, I knew that Mr S had at least one thing correct – that, from earliest times, the Sumerians enjoyed a very high standard of civilization. As you know, in today’s world, where we are taught that early man was primitive, it is rare to hear about high technology in the ancient world. So I felt a measure of rapport with Mr S. For this reason, my customary cautious approach softened toward this man. And I did enjoy reading his books. So I let down my guard just a little to give the “facts” in his books due respect – in particular, the claim that certain ancient texts existed that backed up his story. Accepting his claim also to be a responsible scholar, I went as far as to quote him a couple of times in my book Dead Men’s Secrets. BUT THEN SOMETHING HAPPENED… People begin asking Over a period of time, I received an increasing number of emails asking me about * Planet Nibiru (Planet X) * The Anunnaki * The Nephilim * The 3,600 year orbit of this planet, which is said to bring destruction each time it passes close to the earth. So I felt an increasing obligation to dig deeper. Investigation results bother me Well, I was checking carefully through the story. And an irritating anomaly cropped up. Assuming Mr S’s story were true, such mis-fitting data made no sense. It should not exist! Naturally, this bothered me. Shrug it off as an isolated problem? Perhaps. But it did cry out to be resolved. Nevertheless, pursuing this matter was not so easy. You see, very soon another inconsistency surfaced.… then another…and another. Bother! The problem was not just one, but a growing procession of non-fitting pieces. That’s when it struck me that the problem might be not with the inconsistencies, but with Mr S’ story. Three problems arise Here are some of the serious questions that arose: 1. Mr S said that the *Anunnaki* come from the planet Nibiru (a 12th planet). How do we know this is so? According to our friend, it’s in the Sumerian texts. PROBLEM: Search, search and search! But, no matter where one might turn, it was absolutely *impossible* to *find* *even* *one* *such* *Sumerian* *text!* 2. *Nibiru* is a planet beyond Pluto. How do we know? According to our friend, the Sumerian texts say so. PROBLEM: Again, I could find *not* *one* *single* *Sumerian* *text* *that* *says* *anything* *like* *this.* 3. This planet Nibiru cycles through our solar system *every* *3600* *years. According to Mr S, the Sumerian texts say this. PROBLEM: But try as one might, no such* *Sumerian* *texts* could be found! Not anywhere! The Sumerian texts displayed a distressing habit of being *not* *there. So could the problem be with me? More* awkward questions As I scratched my head over this, a few more awkward questions began to nag at me: * Why did Mr S claim that the biblical pre-Flood “sons of God” who married the “daughters of men” were called “*nephilim” – when the Genesis text itself said something* *very* *different?* * Why did Mr S say that “*nephilim” means “people* of *the* *fiery* *rockets” and also “those* *who* *came* *down* *from* *heaven”? – when, in the Hebrew language, the word “nephilim” meant nothing like this. Why did many of Mr S’ vital *translations* of Sumerian and Mesopotamian words, *differ* so *much* from Mesopotamian cuneiform bilingual dictionaries? Why… why… why? Here was a whole mass of questions now crying out for an answer. Facts above theories You should understand something here. Experience in front line archaeology has taught me that *evidence* must always override theories. If a theory says yes, but the confirmed facts say no, then the theory is wrong. That is plain common sense. In an investigation, there may be hundreds of information bits to consider. One starts out imagining a scenario, but when all the facts are in, the final picture may turn out to be quite different. Let’s say you have hundreds of torn-up bits of newspaper scattered over the table, and you want to fit them together to form a page. But after working for hours, you discover the pieces just do not fit. Well, that’s where I was with the many pieces to Mr Sitchin’s theory. They just did not fit. I write to the Nibiru man So what would you do? What better than to ask the man who gave us the pieces? So I sat down and wrote to Zecharia Sitchin, asking him to help me clarify these matters. Surely he would substantiate his story better than anyone. Perhaps he had sources not available to the rest of the world? With Mr Sitchin’s help, this bothersome matter could be resolved. On the next page is the letter I wrote to Zecharia Sitchin: I “bit on my fingernails”… and waited… Seven weeks passed… I recall vividly that Tuesday morning at the Thames post office. My heart was thumping heavily as I tore open the envelope. And there, inside, was a photocopy of my letter, with Mr Sitchin’s few brief notes scribbled over it. They consisted of only a few words. It was evident that the dear man was stumped to produce any of the claimed Sumerian texts. Sure, as he said, it was in his “books”, but not in the Sumerian texts! Well, I had already been through his books. (You will find the details of his brief reply to each of my questions in my special 224 page report, Just Sitchin Fiction?) What you should know about the Sumerian texts Further investigation, without Mr Sitchin’s help, turned up the fact that all of the Sumerian texts discovered by archaeologists have now been translated and catalogued. No longer a secret, they are finally accessible to us – and even on the Internet. So are you ready for this? Examination shows that there is *not* *one* *Sumerian* *text* that says those things. Not one anywhere. In my book Just Sitchin Fiction? I show you how to check for yourself all the Sumerian texts online. The truth is that in the entire cuneiform record there is *not* *one* *single* *text* that says any of these things Mr Sitchin was claiming they did. These texts do not exist. *They* *are* *all* *made* up! Except one. And that is a cylinder seal known as “VA243” (so named because it is number 243 in the collection of the Vorderasiatische Museum in Berlin). But, contrary to Mr Sitchin’s claim, this seal does not show a 12th planet at all, but is the record of a grain harvest offering to a god. What about the good Mr Sitchin’s Sumerian word translations? Same problem. They are just made up. How can we be sure? Surprise! Not only do we now have access to the Sumerian texts, but also to 4,000 year old Sumerian word dictionaries. That’s right. The Sumerians kept their own dictionaries. And we have these now! And what is their verdict on the “alien-favoring” meanings that Mr Sitchin has been giving us? The words do not mean those things at all! The actual meanings are very, very different. What about Mr Sitchin’s Hebrew word translations? Sorry to be a spoil sport, but these are likewise fictitious. (So that you can check it all for yourself, I now offer you a free 224 page e-book in which you can go through each of these in detail. See below.) Honesty is a treasure. But I am sorry to state that Mr Sitchin has served up to us fictitious word meanings so that we would.accept his.theory,.and (b) he has also “made up” Sumerian documents which do not exist. He asks us to accept such scholarship as his evidence. If the “evidence” for a theory is bogus, then, may I ask you, what of the theory? Millie, bring me an aspirin! * * * * * * * FOR MORE INFORMATION For detailed evidence on the Sumerian texts and Zecharia Sitchin’s claims, see my free special 224 page report, Just Sitchin Fiction? http://www.beforeus.com/sitchin.pdf Editor’s Note: We do not listen to video links or read print material that is linked to items we print, so we may or may not agree with those links. We only look at print material that is sent to us for print. Laura Lee

The Forbidden Secret
Part Two – Aliens?
Chapter 6 – Sumerian Tablets
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

From outer space? – THE SUMERIAN TABLETS SHOCK
Erich von Danicken caused a sensation in the seventies when he claimed that sophisticated ancient relics were the result of a space visit to earth.

Now is the time for the truth.

Von Danicken, like others, assumed that early man struggled for endless millions of years as a primitive dumb and stupid creature, unable to accomplish anything on his own.

Then we find man quite suddenly (in the last few thousand years) nurturing a technology so intricate, so sophisticated, that it suggests intellectual maturity from the start.

You don’t have to be smart to sense there is something wrong here.

So, faced with the new evidence of high technology in ancient times, and realizing that man could not have obtained such advanced thinking capabilities and complex technology simply by evolving from nothing, Von Danicken’s camp suggested that maybe galactic visitors were responsible. These alien giants crossbred with primates to produce modern man, then left behind artefacts from their visit.

Did they? You have to admit, it’s an interesting theory.

The Planet X – Anunnaki shock
And then there’s the Planet X story.

It’s the kind of story you might want to believe. A certain popular writer, describing himself as an expert on ancient texts, tells us that beyond the planet Pluto there is an outer planet called Nibiru.

Nibiru was populated by a reptilian super race, the Annunaki.

The Anunnakis’ own planet was dying. So the Anunnaki came to Planet Earth to attempt a rescue of their planet. The gold on Planet Earth was needed to create a shield for preserving Nibiru’s dwindling atmosphere.

One can actually feel sorry for the Anunnaki.

Anyway, this Planet Nibiru, in its orbit, came close to Planet Earth.

A group of 50 astronauts from Nibiru, with their leader called Enki, splashed down in the waters of the Persian Gulf. Some Anunnaki were sent to mine gold in Africa.

When the toil became unbearable, Enki ‘created’ ‘primitive workers’ by mixing the genes of male Anunnaki with the eggs of early female hominoids, to bring about Homo sapiens – you and me.

This sudden speed-up given to our evolution explains how the Sumerian civilization began suddenly, fully developed, with no evidence of a primitive beginning.

You can credit these extraterrestrials for jump-starting it, this popular writer says.

Oh, and something else. The orbit of Nibiru (which some label Planet X) brings it into our solar system every 3,600 years. It will return to Planet Earth very soon.

Well, that awakens my interest. How about you?

Mr S: “It’s on the Sumerian tablets”
In any case, this gentleman, whom we shall call Mr S, assures us that this is what the Sumerian clay tablets say. In fact, he has been heavily promoting this topic.

In contrast to the airy speculation of von Danicken, Mr S claims to be a scholar. He graduated in economics. But he claims to be an expert in ancient Sumerian texts and Hebrew.

You have to admit, an argument appealing to ancient clay tablets does sound somewhat scholarly.

Oh well, you must have guessed by now who Mr S is, so I might as well name him. But I shall make it absolutely clear that what follows is not about the man. It’s about the subject. I have no problem with Zecharia Sitchin as a person. He’s probably quite a nice guy. (Later note: Sitchin died soon after I wrote this report.)

As it was, for a number of years I accepted this gentleman’s claim that the above story was in those ancient Sumerian records. After all, you just don’t make up such things, do you?

When Mr S first spun his exciting story to us, how many of us had access to all the Sumerian texts?

What he had right
From my years of independent research, I knew that Mr S had at least one thing correct – that, from earliest times, the Sumerians enjoyed a very high standard of civilization.

As you know, in today’s world, where we are taught that early man was primitive, it is rare to hear about high technology in the ancient world. So I felt a measure of rapport with Mr S.

For this reason, my customary cautious approach softened toward this man. And I did enjoy reading his books. So I let down my guard just a little to give the “facts” in his books due respect – in particular, the claim that certain ancient texts existed that backed up his story.

Accepting his claim also to be a responsible scholar, I went as far as to quote him a couple of times in my book Dead Men’s Secrets.

BUT THEN SOMETHING HAPPENED…

People begin asking
Over a period of time, I received an increasing number of emails asking me about

* Planet Nibiru (Planet X) * The Anunnaki
* The Nephilim
* The 3,600 year orbit of this planet, which is said to bring destruction each time it passes close to the earth.

So I felt an increasing obligation to dig deeper.

Investigation results bother me
Well, I was checking carefully through the story. And an irritating anomaly cropped up. Assuming Mr S’s story were true, such mis-fitting data made no sense. It should not exist!

Naturally, this bothered me. Shrug it off as an isolated problem? Perhaps. But it did cry out to be resolved.

Nevertheless, pursuing this matter was not so easy. You see, very soon another inconsistency surfaced.… then another…and another.

Bother! The problem was not just one, but a growing procession of non-fitting pieces.

That’s when it struck me that the problem might be not with the inconsistencies, but with Mr S’ story.

Three problems arise
Here are some of the serious questions that arose:

1. Mr S said that the Anunnaki come from the planet Nibiru (a 12th planet). How do we know this is so? According to our friend, it’s in the Sumerian texts.

PROBLEM: Search, search and search! But, no matter where one might turn, it was absolutely impossible to find even one such Sumerian text!

2. Nibiru is a planet beyond Pluto. How do we know? According to our friend, the Sumerian texts say so.

PROBLEM: Again, I could find not one single Sumerian text that says anything like this.

3. This planet Nibiru cycles through our solar system every 3600 years. According to Mr S, the Sumerian texts say this.

PROBLEM: But try as one might, no such Sumerian texts could be found! Not anywhere!

The Sumerian texts displayed a distressing habit of being not there.

So could the problem be with me?

More awkward questions
As I scratched my head over this, a few more awkward questions began to nag at me:

* Why did Mr S claim that the biblical pre-Flood “sons of God” who married the “daughters of men” were called “nephilim” – when the Genesis text itself said something very different?

* Why did Mr S say that “nephilim” means “people of the fiery rockets” and also “those who came down from heaven”? – when, in the Hebrew language, the word “nephilim” meant nothing like this.

* Why did many of Mr S’ vital translations of Sumerian and Mesopotamian words, differ so much from Mesopotamian cuneiform bilingual dictionaries?

Why… why… why? Here was a whole mass of questions now crying out for an answer.

Facts above theories
You should understand something here. Experience in front line archaeology has taught me that evidence must always override theories. If a theory says yes, but the confirmed facts say no, then the theory is wrong. That is plain common sense.

In an investigation, there may be hundreds of information bits to consider. One starts out imagining a scenario, but when all the facts are in, the final picture may turn out to be quite different.

Let’s say you have hundreds of torn-up bits of newspaper scattered over the table, and you want to fit them together to form a page. But after working for hours, you discover the pieces just do not fit. Well, that’s where I was with the many pieces to Mr Sitchin’s theory. They just did not fit.

I write to the Nibiru man
So what would you do?

What better than to ask the man who gave us the pieces? So I sat down and wrote to Zecharia Sitchin, asking him to help me clarify these matters.

Surely he would substantiate his story better than anyone. Perhaps he had sources not available to the rest of the world? With Mr Sitchin’s help, this bothersome matter could be resolved.

On the next page is the letter I wrote to Zecharia Sitchin:

I “bit on my fingernails”… and waited…

Seven weeks passed…

I recall vividly that Tuesday morning at the Thames post office. My heart was thumping heavily as I tore open the envelope. And there, inside, was a photocopy of my letter, with Mr Sitchin’s few brief notes scribbled over it.

They consisted of only a few words. It was evident that the dear man was stumped to produce any of the claimed Sumerian texts. Sure, as he said, it was in his “books”, but not in the Sumerian texts! Well, I had already been through his books. (You will find the details of his brief reply to each of my questions in my special 224 page report, Just Sitchin Fiction?)

What you should know about the Sumerian texts
Further investigation, without Mr Sitchin’s help, turned up the fact that all of the Sumerian texts discovered by archaeologists have now been translated and catalogued. No longer a secret, they are finally accessible to us – and even on the Internet.

So are you ready for this? Examination shows that there is not one Sumerian text that says those things. Not one anywhere. In my book Just Sitchin Fiction? I show you how to check for yourself all the Sumerian texts online. The truth is that in the entire cuneiform record there is not one single text that says any of these things Mr Sitchin was claiming they did. These texts do not exist. They are all made up!

Except one. And that is a cylinder seal known as “VA243” (so named because it is number 243 in the collection of the Vorderasiatische Museum in Berlin). But, contrary to Mr Sitchin’s claim, this seal does not show a 12th planet at all, but is the record of a grain harvest offering to a god.

What about the good Mr Sitchin’s Sumerian word translations? Same problem. They are just made up.

How can we be sure? Surprise! Not only do we now have access to the Sumerian texts, but also to 4,000 year old Sumerian word dictionaries. That’s right. The Sumerians kept their own dictionaries. And we have these now! And what is their verdict on the “alien-favoring” meanings that Mr Sitchin has been giving us? The words do not mean those things at all! The actual meanings are very, very different.

What about Mr Sitchin’s Hebrew word translations? Sorry to be a spoil sport, but these are likewise fictitious. (So that you can check it all for yourself, I now offer you a free 224 page e-book in which you can go through each of these in detail. See below.)

Honesty is a treasure. But I am sorry to state that Mr Sitchin has

served up to us fictitious word meanings so that we would.accept his.theory,.and
(b) he has also “made up” Sumerian documents which do not exist.

He asks us to accept such scholarship as his evidence. If the “evidence” for a theory is bogus, then, may I ask you, what of the theory?

Millie, bring me an aspirin!

* * * * * * *
FOR MORE INFORMATION
For detailed evidence on the Sumerian texts and Zecharia Sitchin’s claims, see my free special 224 page report, Just Sitchin Fiction? http://www.beforeus.com/sitchin.pdf

Editor’s Note:
We do not listen to video links or read print material that is linked to items we print, so we may or may not agree with those links. We only look at print material that is sent to us for print. Laura Lee

he Forbidden Secret Part Two – Aliens? Chapter 7 – Did Aliens Create Us? (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
“Oh, what a journey that was!” sighed the weary spore as it landed on earth with a bounce. “70 zillion light years – and I’ve made it at last! Now let’s raise the Pleiades flag and claim this planet!” So, could that have happened? Could life have already existed in outer space, and then somehow got here? Life spores drifted from outer space? Some keen minds have been asking whether life might have first appeared on some other planet, then drifted from planet to planet as naked bacterial spores, eventually ending up on this earth? An interesting idea! But it seems Isaac Asimov has already covered that one. Experiments have shown that *ultraviolet* *light* *(UV)* *would* *quickly* *kill* *such* *spores.* In space, UV is much more intense. Also, there are other forms of radiation that would kill off any microscopic spores. The big problem would be the accumulated dosages over an extended time period. But we still get back to this: *matter* *itself* *contains* no *information* *that* *can* *produce* *life* in the first place. So, it boils down to these two facts: 1. No DNA information comes from non-living matter, to even create the spores to start with. 2. Outer space radiation would kill spores travelling toward earth. End of story. DNA brought by aliens? Then what about this idea? Might already-intelligent aliens have introduced the DNA on earth – and then let evolution take over? Despite the Sitchin Fiction fiasco, is it still possible that aliens may have interbred with primates to produce modern man? The quick answer is: I do accept that there are other intelligent beings “out there”. But unfortunately, ET (extraterrestrial) “seeding” would not answer the *origin* of ET *intelligence* in the first place – whether on this earth, or on some other planet. You can work this out for yourself. ETs from another planet also needed a beginning. They needed to be programmed with their DNA from somewhere – before they could even exist! And then, if you expect similar results time and again on numerous planets… the odds against that ever happening by chance become so exponentially remote as to be impossible. Scientists have never ever observed chemicals forming themselves into complex DNA molecules. Life cannot arise spontaneously from non-life. Just as for us on this earth, the odds for ETs to exist on some other planet would be as if they had won a million-dollar lottery a million times in a row. Could genetic engineering occur? Yes. But again, even if by some long-shot miracle earth primates were given an extraterrestrial DNA boost artificially, any subsequent upward evolution *would require continual adding of genetic* *information. However, as we saw in an earlier chapter, there is no natural mechanism that can add this information. So with upward evolution impossible, aliens would have needed to create 100 percent fully fledged, intelligent modern humans in one* *hit. And the same applies to all other life forms, as well. The whole multitude of them complete* *and* *functioning. Could* not just evolve -whether here or in outer space The more you think it through, the clearer it comes. Evolution? Not here – or anywhere! If *evolution* cannot account for the *programming* of *intelligence* (or life itself) on this planet, it is equally impossible to explain a more highly intelligent man *evolving* on some other planet. If *evolution* of original cells is *impossible,* then aliens with physical bodies could not be the product of evolution either. Aliens could not themselves have created the matter from which they ultimately came. The more we discover about the complexity of life, the more one is forced to concede that no *form* of *evolution* is an adequate explanation. There is no escaping it. This planet’s complexity of life – as evidenced by *DNA* and the remains of *fossils* – shows all signs of having “burst” into existence fully formed. It shows no *evidence* of *evolutionary* *ancestry.* And if matter *could* *not* *arrange* *itself* into complex life by natural processes, then even the *ETs* *would* *need* a *Creator.* Evolution of intelligent life is so improbable that it is unlikely to have occurred on any other planet in the entire visible. Universe. So, it all gets back to the question, *who,* *then,* *was* *responsible* *for* *life?* A Superior Designer Like it or not, this requires an ultimate Master Creator, a Superior Designer working to a pre-organized plan. Someone who was *not* *one* of *us,* *but* *much* *greater* *than* us – someone greater than any extraterrestrials, *greater* *than* *the* *creation* *itself.* Someone OUTSIDE OUR TIME AND SPACE arena. No help needed from ETs A Supreme Creator *outside* *time* *and* *space* would be totally adequate to account for (a) the origin of life on earth; (b) man’s original intelligence; and (c) early man’s advanced civilization. No need for ET help. Civilization did not suddenly drop into the Middle East from some star. DNA changes the whole game. It means *man* *was* *already* *intelligent* *from* *the* *first* *cell. Man had the information* ability from Day 1 to invent his own technology and high civilization. All it would require were enough people to support a culture. 6 other things worth remembering Here are a few other things to bear in mind: 1. None of the out-of-place artefacts is composed of material unknown to earth. 2. Their technological makeup conforms with the development of our own modern civilization. 3. For sexual interbreeding to produce *fertile* *offspring,* aliens would (a) need a carbon-based physiology; (b) need to be physically adapted for entering the human female; and (c) their chromosomes would have to be interchangeable, even for artificial insemination. Chromosomes and genes must both match up, which is extremely unlikely and does not happen even between animals and humans of the same planet! Simply put, each separate type has a distinct set of chromosomes which holds its genetic makeup. For example, cats have 19 pairs, rabbits 22 pairs. Each parent donates a chromosome to make each pair. With most species, after fertilization, when the cell starts to divide, there would be an uneven number of chromosomes that needed to ‘pair up.’ The cell would die. There are rare exceptions. Domesticated horses have 32 pairs, and donkeys 31 pairs. Their offspring (mules) have 31.5. Mules are infertile – no offspring. Like zedonks and tigons, their chromosomes match up just enough to allow for interbreeding between similar species. *And* *then* (with rare one generation exceptions) *full* *stop. However, the location of a gene is not in the same place on the same chromosome between species. Chromosome A on a rabbit might hold the genetic codes for ear size, hair color and bone configuration, but chromosome A on a cat might hold the genetic codes for vision, tail length and brain size. They could never match up. 4. And of course you realize that if these were to match, they would already be of the same or closely related species—and man would be already* intelligent. 5. Still unresolved, the problem of the origin of intelligence is only removed to another planet. You have to account for civilizations on two worlds now, instead of one, and you still have to find out how the first began. Now naturally, if evolution cannot account for it on this planet, it is equally impossible to explain a more highly intelligent man evolving on some other planet. 6. Memories of “gods” from the skies are explainable as the recollection by primitive people of visits from contemporary civilizations who had aircraft. Similar reactions have occurred in our day. With whatever good intentions, the “space gods” theory was born in careless research, since then it has been perpetuated through the use of faulty reasoning and sensationalism. Then what are UFOs, and from where? Quite apart from any secret advanced military technology, are UFOs real? Yes, there are real UFOs. Are other worlds inhabited? *Yes, there are other inhabited worlds. Are aliens visiting this earth? No, aliens are not visiting our little planet. Who, then, are the “aliens” that people keep reporting? The subject is much more complex than any of us imagined. It has paranormal* *aspects* but certainly it has very real *physical* *aspects, too. Few have studied this question better than J. Allen Hynek who founded the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS) along with the now noted UFO researcher Jacques Vallee. When interviewed by Newsweek, Hynek expressed this theory: UFOs, he says, may be psychic* *phenomena* and the ‘aliens’ *may* *not* *come* *from* *outer* *space* but from a ‘parallel reality.’ (Hynek, Newsweek, November 21, 1977. Emphasis mine) We shall address this more comprehensively in a later chapter. Meanwhile, here are a few quick facts to think about. The evidence from millions of observations suggests that: They are here – emanating, apparently, from our own planet Earth. 2. Although visible, they may not be physical entities. They appear to be *not* bound by the same material, physical laws. UFOs can · *make* 90 *degree* *turns* at impossible speeds · make other *maneuvers* *impossible* in *the* *physical* *realm. · change* *shape* before our eyes · *melt* *away* into nothing in front of us · apparently ‘*materialize’ (take physical form) · Two* *distinctly* *different* *UFOs* hovering in a clear sky will converge and eventually *merge* *into* *one* *object.* These all hint at another dimension. The *weight* of *evidence* suggests these are paramountly *not* *physical,* *but* *spiritual* manifestations. (In a later chapter, we shall examine this closely.) Extraterrestrials? No. *There* is a *better* *explanation.* Then what about the seeming traces of physical landings? An engineer with an understanding of physics will find no problem with this. They could be explained as *manipulation* of *mass* *and* *energy. Bearing in mind that all solid objects have a vibration frequency within the range perceptible to the human eye. What if the vibration frequency could be altered into vibrations outside the visible range? Some scientists consider it possible. Many open-minded scientists are, in fact, concluding as much -that the cosmos consists of frequencies or dimensions of life that share the same space, just as radio and television frequencies do. Reason* for the “aliens created us” theory So how came the theory that we are the result of alien intervention? This theory stems from the *same* *mindset* as *the* *evolution* *theory* – which is basically a resistance to the idea of an Eternal Being who, by creating us, has a claim on us. We want to do our own thing and banish the idea that one day we might have to account for our behavior. That’s the bottom line. Its promoters are correct, however, on one point: *Human* *intelligence* cannot be the product of chance evolution. Man did appear suddenly—at the top, not at the bottom. Man is a created artefact, far more wonderful than any computer. He was carefully planned and endowed with the gift of language and the most amazing intellect, as well as a feeling for handcrafts and technology. And something else was implanted within man: both the capacity and the need to communicate with his Maker, the prime Intelligence. Consequently, there is a part of every person which is restless, seeking unattainable goals, yet experiencing futility and emptiness until it finds identity and peace with the Creator. And that makes all the difference. Belief in someone you cannot see? QUESTION: Is it reasonable to believe in a Being I cannot see? You ask Australian atheist Philip Adams, and he may tell you that any who believe in a Creator “have bats in their belfry”. They are “gullible”, “a growing multitude of dimwits” in need of “psychiatric help,” and that it’s a “looney proposition.” (Adelaide Weekend Review) ANSWER: Very early every morning someone delivers my newspaper. I’ve never seen him. But the paper is always there. Should I believe that no one has been delivering the paper? In this world we have full confidence that many people we have never seen do exist. Why? Because there is evidence of their presence. So, if our world reveals evidence of an architect behind it, is it any less reasonable to believe in a God I have never seen? “I’m an atheist” My neighbor Bernie came straight out and said it: “I’m an atheist.” “Well, an atheist is one who *knows* there is no God. Do you know all there is to know?” “Of course not.” “Would it be generous to say you know half of all there is to know?” “That would be very generous.” “Then, if you know only half of all there is to know, wouldn’t you have to admit the possibility that God may exist in the body of knowledge you do not have?” “I never thought of that,” mused Bernie. “Well, I’m not an atheist, then I’m an agnostic.” “Now we’re getting somewhere. Agnosticism means you don’t know.” (I didn’t tell him, but the Latin equivalent means “ignoramus.” However, that wouldn’t be nice.) “An agnostic is a doubter,” I said. “Well, that’s what I am.” “There are two types of doubters – honest and dishonest. The honest doubter doesn’t know, but he wants to know. The dishonest doubter doesn’t know because he doesn’t want to know. He can’t find God for the same reason that a thief can’t find a policeman. So which kind of doubter are you?” Bernie’s face softened. “I never really thought about it. I guess I never really wanted to know.” “Bernie, if a man honestly wants to know what is true, then if there is a God He will reveal His reality to that man.” I looked Bernie straight in the eye. Yes, I thought, he’s basically an honest man. “Okay, Bernie,” I said, “Would you do this: Would you be willing to write this down and sign it?” This is what I suggested: God, I don’t know whether you exist or not, but I want to know. And because I want to know, I will make an honest investigation. And because it is an honest investigation, I will follow the results of that investigation wherever they lead me, regardless of the cost. Bernie studied his shoes. Then, after a pause, he again looked up. “Yeah, I’ll do it!” And what happened in the end? Bernie was not disappointed. He says his whole life now has purpose. It is laughable, when you think about it. We have sneered at miracles… but all that time we have believed in the self-creation of life (a miracle, if ever there was one!). We have mocked at the creation of the world by a God… yet we have spoken learnedly of unconscious matter producing consciousness, of a primal cell that created itself! We have maintained the self-beginning of life and denied the possibility of Creation! When God is defined as the Creator of the universe, we are immediately faced with the mutually exclusive alternatives as to whether the universe came about through a random process or by special creation (by God). We have already proved mathematically that random evolution is impossible. This leaves the existence of God as the only option. Who.made.“God”? All that we experience – time, matter and space – had a beginning. This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most fundamental laws of the physical sciences. So, it needed a cause. The universe cannot be self-caused. Nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, and that would be an absurdity. On the other hand, since God, by definition, is the creator of the whole universe, He is the creator of time. Therefore, He is not limited by the time dimension. He created, so He has no *beginning* in *time. He doesn’t have a cause. It is futile for me to ask, Where did He come* from? I cannot use my limitations of time and space to measure His existence. One sunny afternoon, I plopped myself down on the grass to watch a baseball game. For a brief moment my attention was attracted to a tiny ant battling heroically through the grass. That little ant moved around beneath the turf, the blades of grass overhead, the soil beneath, and the tinier life forms all around. That’s the world the ant understands. As a baseball game unfolds, this little ant may see an occasional shadow moving above him. He may hear the thud of giant feet and feel the ground shake. But he has not the foggiest idea what is going on in that world above him. He crawls around the grass shoots, virtually unaware of anything but his own world. Could you explain that baseball game to that ant? We might smile. That little ant would be incapable of comprehending. Come to think of it, are we not like that little ant, when it comes to understanding the Supreme One? Indeed, if I could fully understand God, I should either be a god myself, or God Himself would cease to be God. Just because I live in my reality is no reason to dismiss another reality of existence. So, because I’m ever so inquisitive (that’s why I am a field archaeologist), I now invite you to come with me as we follow Ken Gaub along a road near Dayton, Ohio…

he Forbidden Secret
Part Two – Aliens?
Chapter 7 – Did Aliens Create Us?
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

“Oh, what a journey that was!” sighed the weary spore as it landed on earth with a bounce. “70 zillion light years – and I’ve made it at last! Now let’s raise the Pleiades flag and claim this planet!”

So, could that have happened? Could life have already existed in outer space, and then somehow got here?

Life spores drifted from outer space?
Some keen minds have been asking whether life might have first appeared on some other planet, then drifted from planet to planet as naked bacterial spores, eventually ending up on this earth?

An interesting idea! But it seems Isaac Asimov has already covered that one. Experiments have shown that ultraviolet light (UV) would quickly kill such spores. In space, UV is much more intense.

Also, there are other forms of radiation that would kill off any microscopic spores. The big problem would be the accumulated dosages over an extended time period.

But we still get back to this: matter itself contains no information that can produce life in the first place.

So, it boils down to these two facts:
1. No DNA information comes from non-living matter, to even create the spores to start with.
2. Outer space radiation would kill spores travelling toward earth. End of story.

DNA brought by aliens?
Then what about this idea? Might already-intelligent aliens have introduced the DNA on earth – and then let evolution take over?

Despite the Sitchin Fiction fiasco, is it still possible that aliens may have interbred with primates to produce modern man?

The quick answer is: I do accept that there are other intelligent beings “out there”. But unfortunately, ET (extraterrestrial) “seeding” would not answer the origin of ET intelligence in the first place – whether on this earth, or on some other planet.

You can work this out for yourself. ETs from another planet also needed a beginning. They needed to be programmed with their DNA from somewhere – before they could even exist! And then, if you expect similar results time and again on numerous planets… the odds against that ever happening by chance become so exponentially remote as to be impossible.

Scientists have never ever observed chemicals forming themselves into complex DNA molecules. Life cannot arise spontaneously from non-life.

Just as for us on this earth, the odds for ETs to exist on some other planet would be as if they had won a million-dollar lottery a million times in a row.

Could genetic engineering occur? Yes. But again, even if by some long-shot miracle earth primates were given an extraterrestrial DNA boost artificially, any subsequent upward evolution would require continual adding of genetic information. However, as we saw in an earlier chapter, there is no natural mechanism that can add this information.

So with upward evolution impossible, aliens would have needed to create 100 percent fully fledged, intelligent modern humans in one hit. And the same applies to all other life forms, as well. The whole multitude of them complete and functioning.

Could not just evolve -whether here or in outer space
The more you think it through, the clearer it comes.

Evolution? Not here – or anywhere! If evolution cannot account for the programming of intelligence (or life itself) on this planet, it is equally impossible to explain a more highly intelligent man evolving on some other planet.

If evolution of original cells is impossible, then aliens with physical bodies could not be the product of evolution either. Aliens could not themselves have created the matter from which they ultimately came.

The more we discover about the complexity of life, the more one is forced to concede that no form of evolution is an adequate explanation.

There is no escaping it. This planet’s complexity of life – as evidenced by DNA and the remains of fossils – shows all signs of having “burst” into existence fully formed. It shows no evidence of evolutionary ancestry.

And if matter could not arrange itself into complex life by natural processes, then even the ETs would need a Creator.

Evolution of intelligent life is so improbable that it is unlikely to have occurred on any other planet in the entire visible. Universe.

So, it all gets back to the question, who, then, was responsible for life?

A Superior Designer
Like it or not, this requires an ultimate Master Creator, a Superior Designer working to a pre-organized plan. Someone who was not one of us, but much greater than us – someone greater than any extraterrestrials, greater than the creation itself. Someone OUTSIDE OUR TIME AND SPACE arena.

No help needed from ETs
A Supreme Creator outside time and space would be totally adequate to account for
(a) the origin of life on earth;
(b) man’s original intelligence; and
(c) early man’s advanced civilization.

No need for ET help. Civilization did not suddenly drop into the Middle East from some star.

DNA changes the whole game. It means man was already intelligent from the first cell. Man had the information ability from Day 1 to invent his own technology and high civilization. All it would require were enough people to support a culture.

6 other things worth remembering
Here are a few other things to bear in mind:
1. None of the out-of-place artefacts is composed of material unknown to earth.

2. Their technological makeup conforms with the development of our own modern civilization.

3. For sexual interbreeding to produce fertile offspring, aliens would
(a) need a carbon-based physiology;
(b) need to be physically adapted for entering the human female; and
(c) their chromosomes would have to be interchangeable, even for artificial insemination. Chromosomes and genes must both match up, which is extremely unlikely and does not happen even between animals and humans of the same planet!

Simply put, each separate type has a distinct set of chromosomes which holds its genetic makeup. For example, cats have 19 pairs, rabbits 22 pairs. Each parent donates a chromosome to make each pair. With most species, after fertilization, when the cell starts to divide, there would be an uneven number of chromosomes that needed to ‘pair up.’ The cell would die. There are rare exceptions. Domesticated horses have 32 pairs, and donkeys 31 pairs. Their offspring (mules) have 31.5. Mules are infertile – no offspring. Like zedonks and tigons, their chromosomes match up just enough to allow for interbreeding between similar species. And then (with rare one generation exceptions) full stop. However, the location of a gene is not in the same place on the same chromosome between species. Chromosome A on a rabbit might hold the genetic codes for ear size, hair color and bone configuration, but chromosome A on a cat might hold the genetic codes for vision, tail length and brain size. They could never match up.

4. And of course you realize that if these were to match, they would already be of the same or closely related species—and man would be already intelligent.

5. Still unresolved, the problem of the origin of intelligence is only removed to another planet. You have to account for civilizations on two worlds now, instead of one, and you still have to find out how the first began. Now naturally, if evolution cannot account for it on this planet, it is equally impossible to explain a more highly intelligent man evolving on some other planet.

6. Memories of “gods” from the skies are explainable as the recollection by primitive people of visits from contemporary civilizations who had aircraft. Similar reactions have occurred in our day.

With whatever good intentions, the “space gods” theory was born in careless research, since then it has been perpetuated through the use of faulty reasoning and sensationalism.

Then what are UFOs, and from where?

Quite apart from any secret advanced military technology, are UFOs real? Yes, there are real UFOs.

Are other worlds inhabited? Yes, there are other inhabited worlds.

Are aliens visiting this earth? No, aliens are not visiting our little planet.

Who, then, are the “aliens” that people keep reporting?

The subject is much more complex than any of us imagined. It has paranormal aspects but certainly it has very real physical aspects, too.

Few have studied this question better than J. Allen Hynek who founded the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS) along with the now noted UFO researcher Jacques Vallee.

When interviewed by Newsweek, Hynek expressed this theory:

UFOs, he says, may be psychic phenomena and the ‘aliens’ may not come from outer space but from a ‘parallel reality.’ (Hynek, Newsweek, November 21, 1977. Emphasis mine)

We shall address this more comprehensively in a later chapter. Meanwhile, here are a few quick facts to think about. The evidence from millions of observations suggests that:

They are here – emanating, apparently, from our own planet Earth.
2. Although visible, they may not be physical entities. They appear to be not bound by the same material, physical laws.

UFOs can
· make 90 degree turns at impossible speeds
· make other maneuvers impossible in the physical realm.
· change shape before our eyes
· melt away into nothing in front of us
· apparently ‘materialize’ (take physical form)
· Two distinctly different UFOs hovering in a clear sky will converge and eventually merge into one object.

These all hint at another dimension. The weight of evidence suggests these are paramountly not physical, but spiritual manifestations. (In a later chapter, we shall examine this closely.) Extraterrestrials? No. There is a better explanation.

Then what about the seeming traces of physical landings?

An engineer with an understanding of physics will find no problem with this. They could be explained as manipulation of mass and energy.

Bearing in mind that all solid objects have a vibration frequency within the range perceptible to the human eye. What if the vibration frequency could be altered into vibrations outside the visible range? Some scientists consider it possible.

Many open-minded scientists are, in fact, concluding as much -that the cosmos consists of frequencies or dimensions of life that share the same space, just as radio and television frequencies do.

Reason for the “aliens created us” theory
So how came the theory that we are the result of alien intervention? This theory stems from the same mindset as the evolution theory – which is basically a resistance to the idea of an Eternal Being who, by creating us, has a claim on us. We want to do our own thing and banish the idea that one day we might have to account for our behavior. That’s the bottom line.

Its promoters are correct, however, on one point: Human intelligence cannot be the product of chance evolution. Man did appear suddenly—at the top, not at the bottom. Man is a created artefact, far more wonderful than any computer. He was carefully planned and endowed with the gift of language and the most amazing intellect, as well as a feeling for handcrafts and technology.

And something else was implanted within man: both the capacity and the need to communicate with his Maker, the prime Intelligence. Consequently, there is a part of every person which is restless, seeking unattainable goals, yet experiencing futility and emptiness until it finds identity and peace with the Creator. And that makes all the difference.

Belief in someone you cannot see?
QUESTION: Is it reasonable to believe in a Being I cannot see?

You ask Australian atheist Philip Adams, and he may tell you that any who believe in a Creator “have bats in their belfry”. They are “gullible”, “a growing multitude of dimwits” in need of “psychiatric help,” and that it’s a “looney proposition.” (Adelaide Weekend Review)

ANSWER: Very early every morning someone delivers my newspaper. I’ve never seen him. But the paper is always there. Should I believe that no one has been delivering the paper?

In this world we have full confidence that many people we have never seen do exist.

Why? Because there is evidence of their presence. So, if our world reveals evidence of an architect behind it, is it any less reasonable to believe in a God I have never seen?

“I’m an atheist”
My neighbor Bernie came straight out and said it: “I’m an atheist.”

“Well, an atheist is one who knows there is no God. Do you know all there is to know?”

“Of course not.”

“Would it be generous to say you know half of all there is to know?”

“That would be very generous.”

“Then, if you know only half of all there is to know, wouldn’t you have to admit the possibility that God may exist in the body of knowledge you do not have?”

“I never thought of that,” mused Bernie. “Well, I’m not an atheist, then I’m an agnostic.”

“Now we’re getting somewhere. Agnosticism means you don’t know.” (I didn’t tell him, but the Latin equivalent means “ignoramus.” However, that wouldn’t be nice.) “An agnostic is a doubter,” I said.

“Well, that’s what I am.”

“There are two types of doubters – honest and dishonest. The honest doubter doesn’t know, but he wants to know. The dishonest doubter doesn’t know because he doesn’t want to know. He can’t find God for the same reason that a thief can’t find a policeman. So which kind of doubter are you?”

Bernie’s face softened. “I never really thought about it. I guess I never really wanted to know.”

“Bernie, if a man honestly wants to know what is true, then if there is a God He will reveal His reality to that man.” I looked Bernie straight in the eye. Yes, I thought, he’s basically an honest man.

“Okay, Bernie,” I said, “Would you do this: Would you be willing to write this down and sign it?” This is what I suggested:

God, I don’t know whether you exist or not, but I want to know. And because I want to know, I will make an honest investigation. And because it is an honest investigation, I will follow the results of that investigation wherever they lead me, regardless of the cost.

Bernie studied his shoes. Then, after a pause, he again looked up. “Yeah, I’ll do it!” And what happened in the end? Bernie was not disappointed. He says his whole life now has purpose.

It is laughable, when you think about it. We have sneered at miracles… but all that time we have believed in the self-creation of life (a miracle, if ever there was one!).

We have mocked at the creation of the world by a God… yet we have spoken learnedly of unconscious matter producing consciousness, of a primal cell that created itself!

We have maintained the self-beginning of life and denied the possibility of Creation!

When God is defined as the Creator of the universe, we are immediately faced with the mutually exclusive alternatives as to whether the universe came about through a random process or by special creation (by God). We have already proved mathematically that random evolution is impossible. This leaves the existence of God as the only option.

Who.made.“God”?
All that we experience – time, matter and space – had a beginning. This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most fundamental laws of the physical sciences. So, it needed a cause. The universe cannot be self-caused. Nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, and that would be an absurdity.

On the other hand, since God, by definition, is the creator of the whole universe, He is the creator of time. Therefore, He is not limited by the time dimension. He created, so He has no beginning in time. He doesn’t have a cause. It is futile for me to ask, Where did He come from? I cannot use my limitations of time and space to measure His existence.

One sunny afternoon, I plopped myself down on the grass to watch a baseball game. For a brief moment my attention was attracted to a tiny ant battling heroically through the grass. That little ant moved around beneath the turf, the blades of grass overhead, the soil beneath, and the tinier life forms all around. That’s the world the ant understands. As a baseball game unfolds, this little ant may see an occasional shadow moving above him. He may hear the thud of giant feet and feel the ground shake. But he has not the foggiest idea what is going on in that world above him. He crawls around the grass shoots, virtually unaware of anything but his own world.

Could you explain that baseball game to that ant? We might smile. That little ant would be incapable of comprehending.

Come to think of it, are we not like that little ant, when it comes to understanding the Supreme One? Indeed, if I could fully understand God, I should either be a god myself, or God Himself would cease to be God. Just because I live in my reality is no reason to dismiss another reality of existence.

So, because I’m ever so inquisitive (that’s why I am a field archaeologist), I now invite you to come with me as we follow Ken Gaub along a road near Dayton, Ohio…

The Forbidden Secret Part Three – A Supreme Being? Chapter 8 – Desperate Phone Call (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
A *personal,* *caring* *Creator?* – DESPERATE PHONE CALL “I don’t know what to do!” exclaimed Ken. “Perhaps I need a change.” For quite a while now, Ken Gaub’s time had been spent giving a boost to others… helping those who were hurting… trying to influence their lives in a positive way. With this in mind, he and his family had travelled, both across the United States and overseas. He had also established a counselling service on radio and television. But that day in the 1970s as Ken, his wife Barbara and their children drove their two buses down I-75 just south of Dayton, Ohio, Ken was feeling drained and discouraged. “Oh,” he cried, “Am I doing any good, travelling around like this? God, is this what you want me to do?” His thoughts were suddenly interrupted. “Hey, Dad, let’s get some pizza!” Ken turned off at Route 741. There was sign after sign, offering fast food. “A sign,” mused Ken. “That’s what I need… a sign.” As Ken’s family poured out, and across to the pizza parlor, Ken announced, “I’m not really hungry. I’ll just stretch my legs.” He grabbed himself a soft drink and ambled back to the bus. Was it burnout? He was just plain exhausted. A persistent ringing broke into Ken’s concentration. He looked across at the outside phone booth. The attendant seemed oblivious to the sound. Ken grew impatient. “Why doesn’t someone answer it?” he wondered. “What if it’s an emergency?” Nine rings. Ten…Fifteen… His curiosity perked up. He shuffled over to the booth and picked up the receiver. “Hello?” The operator’s voice came through. “Long distance call for Ken Gaub.” Ken was dazed. “No,” he heard himself saying. “You are crazy!” And then, realizing how rude that must have sounded, he apologized and tried to explain. “I was just walking down the road here. And the phone was ringing…” The operator simply asked again, “Is Ken Gaub there? I have a long-distance call for Ken Gaub.” Oh, this must be Candid Camera, he thought, instinctively. Ken ran his hands through his hair. But no camera crew appeared. He looked toward the pizza house. The family was still inside. They were at this restaurant only on a whim. It was randomly selected. And no one knew they were here. No one. “I have a long-distance call for Ken Gaub, sir.” The operator sounded quite insistent now. “Is Mr. Gaub there, or isn’t he?” “Operator, I’m Ken Gaub.” Ken could make no sense of this whole thing. “Are you sure?” asked the operator. Then suddenly there was another woman’s voice on the phone. “Yes, that’s him, Operator!” she exclaimed. “Mr. Gaub, I’m Millie from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. You don’t know me. But I’m desperate. Please help me.” “How can I help you?” And Ken heard the operator hang up. The woman at the other end was weeping now. Ken patiently waited. Finally, she gained control. “I’m at the end of my rope. I was about to kill myself. I started to write a suicide note. Then I began to tell God I really didn’t want to do this.” In her despair, Millie recalled that she had seen Ken on television. Oh, if she could only talk to that kind, understanding person…. But that was impossible. There was no place she knew to reach him. Millie spoke a little more calmly now. “So, I began to finish the note. And then some numbers came into my mind, and I wrote them down.” Millie was weeping again. Silently Ken prayed. “Show me how to help this woman.” Through her tears, Millie went on. “I looked at those numbers. And the thought came… wouldn’t it be wonderful if God has given me Ken Gaub’s phone number? Oh, Mr. Gaub, I just can’t believe I’m actually talking to you. Are you in your office in California?” “No,” responded Ken, “I do not have an office in California. It’s in Yakima, Washington.” “Then where are you?” called the woman, bewildered. Even more puzzled was Ken. “Millie, it was you who made the call. Don’t you know?” “No, I have no idea what area this is,” said Millie. “I just dialed the long-distance operator. I gave the numbers to her and made it a person-to-person call.” Gaub advised Millie what to do. And it was to take her into a successful new life. Still stunned, Ken hung up. “Barb,” enthused Ken as his family climbed back into the bus, “you won’t believe this! God knows where I am!” This incident was reported by Nancy Leahy to Joan Wester Anderson and appeared in the #1 New York Times bestselling Chicken Soup for the Soul, by Jack Canfield and Mark Victor Hansen. Some questions · Who was it that arranged those events in such a manner that Ken and Millie should meet on the phone exactly at that hour? · Who prompted Ken’s son to ask for pizza exactly when he did? · Who led Ken to pull into that precise restaurant? · Who persuaded Ken to stay outdoors near the payphone booth? · Who gave Millie the exact sequence of numbers that would ring that precise telephone beside the road? · Who imparted these “impressions”? · *Who* *answered* *both* *their* *prayers* *with* *one* *“miracle”* *connection?* To each separately an electrifying response. And that again raises the BIG question… * Who programs those many DNA machines, all so different from one another, to *inter-connect* inside a cell? Could it be *the* *same* *Superior* *Intelligence* that *connected* Ken and Millie to the pay phone? Is this evidence of a Designer who cares about his creation? Speaking of this God that thousands of scientists now believe they can pray to, if this God can not only plan, design and create, might he also be able to hear? You may ask, If God exists, how on earth could he be concerned about every human being in the world? Why does a mother love her baby? She can give no reason, except that it belongs to her. The chemicals comprising its body are worth only a few dollars. It weighs perhaps eight pounds of flesh. That tiny baby causes trouble, disrupts the family routine and deprives her of sleep. But he belongs to her and she loves him. Suppose you have five children. Did you love your first baby? Naturally you did. Did you love the second child only half as much? Of course not. So, what about the third? You loved it just as much as the other two. What if you had twenty children? You would love each child just as much as the others. Think now. If you and I, limited as we are, could have hearts big enough to love all our children, why would a limitless God find it difficult to love all of his children on this planet? In our computer age, what’s the potential for programming information? By pressing a few keys, one can already gain information about the financial situation of people with credit cards from all over the world. Conceivably, in a few years from now, everyone on earth will have a number – by which all their information will be stored on one machine. Now if such a vast storage of information can be memorized on one inorganic electronic brain, surely it is conceivable that there is a supernatural being that understands us in greater detail? “Not testable” A guy called DL heard another guy Mark Harwood mention God – and was he upset! “The god proposition does not appear reasonable,” said DL. “It’s both untestable and founded upon lack of knowledge. How can one rationally be expected to believe (have faith) in untestable propositions.” “Well,” said Mark, “we all have faith in nontestable propositions every day of our lives. Rather than being based on lack of knowledge, our faith is usually based on very real experience. “For instance, the room you are sitting in is part of a larger building. Can you see the architect and the builder? Have you met them? How do you know they exist? You know the building had a designer and a builder because in your experience you observe that buildings do not make themselves. They all have a designer and builder. “So, you have faith that the designer and the builder have existed, because the building exists and your faith is based on knowledge. But the existence of the designer and builder is *not scientifically* *testable*! It would be irrational to assume there was no designer or builder just because you can’t see them now. “In exactly the same way, we look around at the amazing diversity and complexity of living things, and we know there must have been a designer and a builder. “One of the sure evidences of design is the presence of information in the genetic code of living things. The coded information is not inherent in the physics or chemistry of the DNA molecule, just like the information in a book does not reside in the ink and the paper. Instead, the information resides in the way the base pairs of the DNA are arranged, and in the way the ink makes shapes on the paper, so that the code is intelligible and meaning is transferred. “Therefore, the inference that the universe has a Creator who is outside of what has been made, in other words, a supernatural Being, is entirely reasonable and soundly based on knowledge and experience.” DL: “I’ll only believe what is testable. Is there any scientifically testable evidence for the existence of any spiritual being?” MARK: “The answer is clearly ‘No’. But the problem is you are asking the wrong question. Perhaps you could ask: 1. Do you only consider something to be real if it is scientifically testable? 2. Is love real? 3. Are historical events real? “Clearly, there are very real things that are not accessible via scientific experiments. Most importantly, past events can only be determined by historical records as they are not available for observation and are therefore not accessible by science.” And I believe we do have such historical records…

The Forbidden Secret
Part Three – A Supreme Being?
Chapter 8 – Desperate Phone Call
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

A personal, caring Creator? – DESPERATE PHONE CALL
“I don’t know what to do!” exclaimed Ken. “Perhaps I need a change.”

For quite a while now, Ken Gaub’s time had been spent giving a boost to others… helping those who were hurting… trying to influence their lives in a positive way.

With this in mind, he and his family had travelled, both across the United States and overseas. He had also established a counselling service on radio and television.

But that day in the 1970s as Ken, his wife Barbara and their children drove their two buses down I-75 just south of Dayton, Ohio, Ken was feeling drained and discouraged.

“Oh,” he cried, “Am I doing any good, travelling around like this? God, is this what you want me to do?”

His thoughts were suddenly interrupted. “Hey, Dad, let’s get some pizza!”

Ken turned off at Route 741. There was sign after sign, offering fast food.

“A sign,” mused Ken. “That’s what I need… a sign.”

As Ken’s family poured out, and across to the pizza parlor, Ken announced, “I’m not really hungry. I’ll just stretch my legs.”

He grabbed himself a soft drink and ambled back to the bus. Was it burnout? He was just plain exhausted.

A persistent ringing broke into Ken’s concentration. He looked across at the outside phone booth. The attendant seemed oblivious to the sound.

Ken grew impatient. “Why doesn’t someone answer it?” he wondered. “What if it’s an emergency?”

Nine rings. Ten…Fifteen…

His curiosity perked up. He shuffled over to the booth and picked up the receiver. “Hello?”

The operator’s voice came through. “Long distance call for Ken Gaub.”

Ken was dazed. “No,” he heard himself saying. “You are crazy!” And then, realizing how rude that must have sounded, he apologized and tried to explain. “I was just walking down the road here. And the phone was ringing…”

The operator simply asked again, “Is Ken Gaub there? I have a long-distance call for Ken Gaub.”

Oh, this must be Candid Camera, he thought, instinctively. Ken ran his hands through his hair. But no camera crew appeared.

He looked toward the pizza house. The family was still inside. They were at this restaurant only on a whim. It was randomly selected. And no one knew they were here. No one.

“I have a long-distance call for Ken Gaub, sir.” The operator sounded quite insistent now. “Is Mr. Gaub there, or isn’t he?”

“Operator, I’m Ken Gaub.” Ken could make no sense of this whole thing.

“Are you sure?” asked the operator. Then suddenly there was another woman’s voice on the phone.

“Yes, that’s him, Operator!” she exclaimed. “Mr. Gaub, I’m Millie from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. You don’t know me. But I’m desperate. Please help me.”

“How can I help you?” And Ken heard the operator hang up.

The woman at the other end was weeping now. Ken patiently waited. Finally, she gained control. “I’m at the end of my rope. I was about to kill myself. I started to write a suicide note. Then I began to tell God I really didn’t want to do this.”

In her despair, Millie recalled that she had seen Ken on television. Oh, if she could only talk to that kind, understanding person….

But that was impossible. There was no place she knew to reach him. Millie spoke a little more calmly now. “So, I began to finish the note. And then some numbers came into my mind, and I wrote them down.” Millie was weeping again.

Silently Ken prayed. “Show me how to help this woman.”

Through her tears, Millie went on. “I looked at those numbers. And the thought came… wouldn’t it be wonderful if God has given me Ken Gaub’s phone number? Oh, Mr. Gaub, I just can’t believe I’m actually talking to you. Are you in your office in California?”

“No,” responded Ken, “I do not have an office in California. It’s in Yakima, Washington.”

“Then where are you?” called the woman, bewildered.

Even more puzzled was Ken. “Millie, it was you who made the call. Don’t you know?”

“No, I have no idea what area this is,” said Millie. “I just dialed the long-distance operator. I gave the numbers to her and made it a person-to-person call.”

Gaub advised Millie what to do. And it was to take her into a successful new life.

Still stunned, Ken hung up.

“Barb,” enthused Ken as his family climbed back into the bus, “you won’t believe this! God knows where I am!”

This incident was reported by Nancy Leahy to Joan Wester Anderson and appeared in the #1 New York Times bestselling Chicken Soup for the Soul, by Jack Canfield and Mark Victor Hansen.

Some questions
· Who was it that arranged those events in such a manner that Ken and Millie should meet on the phone exactly at that hour?

· Who prompted Ken’s son to ask for pizza exactly when he did?

· Who led Ken to pull into that precise restaurant?

· Who persuaded Ken to stay outdoors near the payphone booth?

· Who gave Millie the exact sequence of numbers that would ring that precise telephone beside the road?

· Who imparted these “impressions”?

· Who answered both their prayers with one “miracle” connection? To each separately an electrifying response.

And that again raises the BIG question…

* Who programs those many DNA machines, all so different from one another, to inter-connect inside a cell? Could it be the same Superior Intelligence that connected Ken and Millie to the pay phone?

Is this evidence of a Designer who cares about his creation?
Speaking of this God that thousands of scientists now believe they can pray to, if this God can not only plan, design and create, might he also be able to hear?

You may ask, If God exists, how on earth could he be concerned about every human being in the world?

Why does a mother love her baby? She can give no reason, except that it belongs to her. The chemicals comprising its body are worth only a few dollars. It weighs perhaps eight pounds of flesh. That tiny baby causes trouble, disrupts the family routine and deprives her of sleep. But he belongs to her and she loves him.

Suppose you have five children. Did you love your first baby? Naturally you did. Did you love the second child only half as much? Of course not. So, what about the third? You loved it just as much as the other two. What if you had twenty children? You would love each child just as much as the others.

Think now. If you and I, limited as we are, could have hearts big enough to love all our children, why would a limitless God find it difficult to love all of his children on this planet?

In our computer age, what’s the potential for programming information? By pressing a few keys, one can already gain information about the financial situation of people with credit cards from all over the world. Conceivably, in a few years from now, everyone on earth will have a number – by which all their information will be stored on one machine. Now if such a vast storage of information can be memorized on one inorganic electronic brain, surely it is conceivable that there is a supernatural being that understands us in greater detail?

“Not testable”
A guy called DL heard another guy Mark Harwood mention God – and was he upset! “The god proposition does not appear reasonable,” said DL. “It’s both untestable and founded upon lack of knowledge. How can one rationally be expected to believe (have faith) in untestable propositions.”

“Well,” said Mark, “we all have faith in nontestable propositions every day of our lives. Rather than being based on lack of knowledge, our faith is usually based on very real experience.

“For instance, the room you are sitting in is part of a larger building. Can you see the architect and the builder? Have you met them? How do you know they exist? You know the building had a designer and a builder because in your experience you observe that buildings do not make themselves. They all have a designer and builder.

“So, you have faith that the designer and the builder have existed, because the building exists and your faith is based on knowledge. But the existence of the designer and builder is not scientifically testable! It would be irrational to assume there was no designer or builder just because you can’t see them now.

“In exactly the same way, we look around at the amazing diversity and complexity of living things, and we know there must have been a designer and a builder.

“One of the sure evidences of design is the presence of information in the genetic code of living things. The coded information is not inherent in the physics or chemistry of the DNA molecule, just like the information in a book does not reside in the ink and the paper. Instead, the information resides in the way the base pairs of the DNA are arranged, and in the way the ink makes shapes on the paper, so that the code is intelligible and meaning is transferred.

“Therefore, the inference that the universe has a Creator who is outside of what has been made, in other words, a supernatural Being, is entirely reasonable and soundly based on knowledge and experience.”

DL: “I’ll only believe what is testable. Is there any scientifically testable evidence for the existence of any spiritual being?”

MARK: “The answer is clearly ‘No’. But the problem is you are asking the wrong question. Perhaps you could ask:

1. Do you only consider something to be real if it is scientifically testable?
2. Is love real?
3. Are historical events real?

“Clearly, there are very real things that are not accessible via scientific experiments. Most importantly, past events can only be determined by historical records as they are not available for observation and are therefore not accessible by science.”

And I believe we do have such historical records…

The Forbidden Secret Part Three – A Supreme Being? Chapter 9 – Would He Want to Speak to Us? (Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)
Communication – WOULD HE WANT TO SPEAK TO US? We have a beautiful Labrador dog. After feeding him, do we take no interest in talking to him? We hear his cry, we experience the joy in his eyes, we feel him licking our hand. Do we never want him to experience the love that is in our hearts for him? Don’t you ever want to let your pet know that you love him? Of course you do! And who implanted that ability and desire into your heart? We have already considered a Supreme Being’s ability and willingness to hear us. But, since we are designed to receive information, then might our Maker desire to communicate with us – to send us messages? Would that make sense? Ability to speak to us? But would He be *able* to communicate to us? Think now! Here is this Master Designer who has *inter-dimensionally* *transmitted* *coded* *data* into our DNA molecules. He has programmed our DNA to send millions of messages a second throughout our bodies. And we think He cannot pass on additional information in other ways to us? Even to guiding human minds to write down messages? The personality question That naturally raises the question as to whether God is just some impersonal force or a personal Being. Ask yourself: Did your personality come from impersonality? Is the Intelligent Programmer who planned and produced your DNA – who designed you to be a personal, intelligent, thinking, speaking, communicating being – does that Designer have LESS ability than you? Would not our Maker possess the same ability to think, speak and communicate, that he has given us? The Intelligence that made the ear, can he not hear? Whoever designed the eye, can he not see? Observable *scientific* *evidence* indicates that an effect is not greater than its cause. It always takes a *greater* *source* of information to produce information. On this basis, the design of living, intelligent, and personal human beings requires a *greater* *cause* outside the creation itself which possesses life, intelligence and *personality* – a Superior Intelligent Being. It makes sense that such a Supreme Creator would be able to – and desire to – communicate with creatures He has made. And would *not* *need* a space ship to do it, either. Again, wouldn’t it make sense that humans were created, not for what they can do for their Maker (or even He for them), but for an enduring relationship of love, fellowship, and interaction with Him? And that this relationship defines the *purpose* of human existence and gives it *meaning? In fact, might He even document evidence* of our origins, and stamp the document with His signature in ways that no human being could replicate? So that none of us would have any rational reason for doubting? Actually, there does exist a document that 3,800 times makes the outrageous claim to be not man-made, but the Creator Himself speaking to us – and it even *challenges* us to *disprove* it. So why don’t we accept this challenge? If the document’s claims can be disproved, fine. But if we can establish its credibility, then might it contain information relevant to our subject? Remember, we’re talking about *evidence*, not preconceived ideas. So, what is this document? And how accurate is it? In the next four chapters we shall see…

The Forbidden Secret
Part Three – A Supreme Being?
Chapter 9 – Would He Want to Speak to Us?
(Copyright 00-00-2011) by Jonathan Gray (New Zealand)

Communication – WOULD HE WANT TO SPEAK TO US?

We have a beautiful Labrador dog. After feeding him, do we take no interest in talking to him? We hear his cry, we experience the joy in his eyes, we feel him licking our hand. Do we never want him to experience the love that is in our hearts for him? Don’t you ever want to let your pet know that you love him?

Of course you do! And who implanted that ability and desire into your heart?

We have already considered a Supreme Being’s ability and willingness to hear us. But, since we are designed to receive information, then might our Maker desire to communicate with us – to send us messages? Would that make sense?

Ability to speak to us?
But would He be able to communicate to us? Think now! Here is this Master Designer who has inter-dimensionally transmitted coded data into our DNA molecules. He has programmed our DNA to send millions of messages a second throughout our bodies. And we think He cannot pass on additional information in other ways to us? Even to guiding human minds to write down messages?

The personality question
That naturally raises the question as to whether God is just some impersonal force or a personal Being.

Ask yourself: Did your personality come from impersonality? Is the Intelligent Programmer who planned and produced your DNA – who designed you to be a personal, intelligent, thinking, speaking, communicating being – does that Designer have LESS ability than you?

Would not our Maker possess the same ability to think, speak and communicate, that he has given us? The Intelligence that made the ear, can he not hear? Whoever designed the eye, can he not see?

Observable scientific evidence indicates that an effect is not greater than its cause. It always takes a greater source of information to produce information. On this basis, the design of living, intelligent, and personal human beings requires a greater cause outside the creation itself which possesses life, intelligence and personality – a Superior Intelligent Being.

It makes sense that such a Supreme Creator would be able to – and desire to – communicate with creatures He has made. And would not need a space ship to do it, either.

Again, wouldn’t it make sense that humans were created, not for what they can do for their Maker (or even He for them), but for an enduring relationship of love, fellowship, and interaction with Him? And that this relationship defines the purpose of human existence and gives it meaning?

In fact, might He even document evidence of our origins, and stamp the document with His signature in ways that no human being could replicate? So that none of us would have any rational reason for doubting?

Actually, there does exist a document that 3,800 times makes the outrageous claim to be not man-made, but the Creator Himself speaking to us – and it even challenges us to disprove it. So why don’t we accept this challenge?

If the document’s claims can be disproved, fine. But if we can establish its credibility, then might it contain information relevant to our subject?

Remember, we’re talking about evidence, not preconceived ideas.

So, what is this document? And how accurate is it? In the next four chapters we shall see…

Random Articles

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Holy Days 2026
Passover (Observed at Sunset the Evening Before.)	April 2, 2026
Passover/Unleavened Bread	April 2-8, 2026
Pentecost	May 22, 2026
Trumpets	September 12, 2026
Atonement	September 21, 2026
Tabernacles	September 26 to October 2, 2026
Last Great Day	October 3, 2026